diff options
-rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/__34__sha256sum_failed__34___for_some_files_with_newest_Android_client.mdwn | 55 |
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/__34__sha256sum_failed__34___for_some_files_with_newest_Android_client.mdwn b/doc/bugs/__34__sha256sum_failed__34___for_some_files_with_newest_Android_client.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..111c8e833 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/__34__sha256sum_failed__34___for_some_files_with_newest_Android_client.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +### Please describe the problem. +git annex fsck and git annex get are showing (false?) sha256sum failed messages on Android with the 2016-07-19 android 5.0 build. I haven't seen this before but have been using git-annex on Android, with the same repository for a year, so I'd guess regression. + +I ran fsck on the files on another machine (Watt: Debian testing, 6.20160511-1) and no errors occur. Note that isn't the machine that the Android tablet transfers from (Einstein: Debian stable + backports, 5.20151208-1~bpo8+1). The Android shell didn't have a sha256sum command, but it had an md5 command—and I tried one of the files (Management Report.pdf) and the md5 matches on both Watt and the Android tablet. + +I also ran git annex fsck on Einstein (the entire repository, since it's a bare repo) and the only problem it found was a single (different) key with an insufficient number of trusted copies. + +So I think the file is actually fine. + +### What steps will reproduce the problem? +Unsure. Dropping and re-getting those files didn't help; it showed a sha256 error with get too. + +The only difference I can think of between the files that fail and work is the size: + +[[!format text """ +u0_a180@manta:/sdcard/Westerley-Board/Board Packets & Reports/2016-08-25 (Regular) $ ls -l +-rw-rw---- root sdcard_r 116225 2016-08-24 05:40 Agenda 16-08-25.pdf +-rw-rw---- root sdcard_r 10128521 2016-08-24 06:02 Management Report scan 2 (annotated; Anthony).pdf +-rw-rw---- root sdcard_r 10128521 2016-08-24 06:02 Management Report scan 2.pdf +-rw-rw---- root sdcard_r 53313352 2016-08-24 06:02 Management Report.pdf +-rw-rw---- root sdcard_r 27154 2016-08-24 06:02 WHOA Chart of Accounts Spreadsheet.xlsx +"""]] + +### What version of git-annex are you using? On what operating system? + + +### Please provide any additional information below. + +[[!format text """ +u0_a180@manta:/sdcard/Westerley-Board/Board Packets & Reports/2016-08-25 (Regular) $ git annex fsck * +WARNING: linker: git-annex has text relocations. This is wasting memory and prevents security hardening. Please fix. +fsck Agenda 16-08-25.pdf (checksum...) ok +fsck Management Report scan 2 (annotated; Anthony).pdf (checksum...) +sha256sum failed +ok +fsck Management Report scan 2.pdf (checksum...) +sha256sum failed +ok +fsck Management Report.pdf (checksum...) +sha256sum failed +ok +fsck WHOA Chart of Accounts Spreadsheet.xlsx (checksum...) ok +(recording state in git...) +__bionic_open_tzdata_path: ANDROID_ROOT not set! +__bionic_open_tzdata_path: ANDROID_ROOT not set! +__bionic_open_tzdata_path: ANDROID_ROOT not set! +__bionic_open_tzdata_path: ANDROID_ROOT not set! +__bionic_open_tzdata_path: ANDROID_ROOT not set! +__bionic_open_tzdata_path: ANDROID_ROOT not set! +u0_a180@manta:/sdcard/Westerley-Board/Board Packets & Reports/2016-08-25 (Regular) $ +"""]] + +### Have you had any luck using git-annex before? (Sometimes we get tired of reading bug reports all day and a lil' positive end note does wonders) + +Yes, I've been using git annex for I think a year and a half now, on several repositories. It works pretty well. I have a total of around 315GB and 23K annexed keys across them (counting each annex only once, even though they're cloned on a bunch of machines). |