diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_3_e1f39c4af5bdb0daabf000da80858cd9._comment | 10 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_3_e1f39c4af5bdb0daabf000da80858cd9._comment b/doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_3_e1f39c4af5bdb0daabf000da80858cd9._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c5bb26f59 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_3_e1f39c4af5bdb0daabf000da80858cd9._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joey.kitenet.net/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 3" + date="2011-03-30T18:15:18Z" + content=""" +Yes, encrypting the symmetric key with users' regular gpg keys is the plan. + +I don't think that encryption of content in a git annex remote makes much sense; the filenames obviously cannot be encrypted there. It's more likely that the same encryption would get used for a bup remote, or with the [[special_remotes/directory]] remote I threw in today. +"""]] |