diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/wishlist:_backends_for_other_peer_network_data_stores___40__gnunet__44___freenet__41__.mdwn | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/wishlist:_backends_for_other_peer_network_data_stores___40__gnunet__44___freenet__41__.mdwn b/doc/todo/wishlist:_backends_for_other_peer_network_data_stores___40__gnunet__44___freenet__41__.mdwn index d970bf98e..8b58751e2 100644 --- a/doc/todo/wishlist:_backends_for_other_peer_network_data_stores___40__gnunet__44___freenet__41__.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/wishlist:_backends_for_other_peer_network_data_stores___40__gnunet__44___freenet__41__.mdwn @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ I mean gnunet, freenet, BitTorrent (also trackerless). Before dropping a file locally, the BitTorrent client should check that all parts are still available from the peers. -Of course, there is no guarantee assumed that the content won't disappear from the peer network in future: they act more like a cache rather than an archive you on whose lifespan you decide. (I'm only not sure about gnunet now: whether there is a rule of dropping unused content from it, like in freenet.) +Of course, there is no guarantee assumed that the content won't disappear from the peer network in future: they act more like a cache rather than an archive on whose lifespan you decide. (I'm only not sure about gnunet now: whether there is a rule of dropping unused content from it, like in freenet.) Also networks like namecoin (derived from bitcoin) can be used as a key-value store. Despite being a peer network, a system like namecoin actually could offer the publisher more control over the lifespan of the content: he should be able to offer "financial" reward for others processing his key-value data. (But I'm not sure namecoin is designed reasonably for this reward system to work actually; but there might be appearing other similar systems.) |