summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/incremental_fsck_should_not_use_sticky_bit/comment_5_ec29ed50c4321cf9e21c56c13c65156b._comment8
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/wishlist:_perform_fsck_remotely/comment_3_5ec2e0e248dfd4ca46aef89cc5658d18._comment8
2 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck_should_not_use_sticky_bit/comment_5_ec29ed50c4321cf9e21c56c13c65156b._comment b/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck_should_not_use_sticky_bit/comment_5_ec29ed50c4321cf9e21c56c13c65156b._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a627e1841
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/incremental_fsck_should_not_use_sticky_bit/comment_5_ec29ed50c4321cf9e21c56c13c65156b._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="68.119.96.78"
+ subject="comment 5"
+ date="2013-12-21T16:26:51Z"
+ content="""
+<http://hackage.haskell.org/package/TCache> looks potentially good. It seems that it may allow storing stuff on disk and only loading it into cache when accessed, but I am not sure. Need to run some tests to try it out.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/todo/wishlist:_perform_fsck_remotely/comment_3_5ec2e0e248dfd4ca46aef89cc5658d18._comment b/doc/todo/wishlist:_perform_fsck_remotely/comment_3_5ec2e0e248dfd4ca46aef89cc5658d18._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..91d07b765
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/todo/wishlist:_perform_fsck_remotely/comment_3_5ec2e0e248dfd4ca46aef89cc5658d18._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="68.119.96.78"
+ subject="comment 3"
+ date="2013-12-21T16:27:16Z"
+ content="""
+There is now a remoteFsck action in the Remote data structure. So far it is only implemented for git remotes, and `git annex fsck` does not use it; only the assistant does.
+"""]]