diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_20_546331742e906a68d760c1bf44be63c4._comment | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_20_546331742e906a68d760c1bf44be63c4._comment b/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_20_546331742e906a68d760c1bf44be63c4._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7be874d26 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/external_special_remote_protocol/comment_20_546331742e906a68d760c1bf44be63c4._comment @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://me.yahoo.com/a/EbvxpTI_xP9Aod7Mg4cwGhgjrCrdM5s-#7c0f4" + subject="but which of the 3?" + date="2015-09-10T03:16:17Z" + content=""" +could you express your expert choice explicitly among those 3 choices how I should react to WHEREIS in my (archives) case + +1. report the same url +2. \"spell it out\" +3. WHEREIS-FAILURE + +or really not implement it at all? (we are still at VERSION 1, so I thought that not implementing it might lead to some undesired side-effects) +"""]] |