diff options
-rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/Large_unannex_operations_result_in_stale_symlinks_and_data_loss/comment_10_20429a1a7be9a6b0b22c02081586adbc._comment | 10 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Large_unannex_operations_result_in_stale_symlinks_and_data_loss/comment_10_20429a1a7be9a6b0b22c02081586adbc._comment b/doc/bugs/Large_unannex_operations_result_in_stale_symlinks_and_data_loss/comment_10_20429a1a7be9a6b0b22c02081586adbc._comment deleted file mode 100644 index 1b8900209..000000000 --- a/doc/bugs/Large_unannex_operations_result_in_stale_symlinks_and_data_loss/comment_10_20429a1a7be9a6b0b22c02081586adbc._comment +++ /dev/null @@ -1,10 +0,0 @@ -[[!comment format=mdwn - username="https://me.yahoo.com/a/2grhJvAC049fJnvALDXek.6MRZMTlg--#eec89" - nickname="John" - subject="comment 10" - date="2013-08-30T05:59:39Z" - content=""" -I'll chime in and say that the non-fast behavior being the default seems wrong, and making hard-link invisibly seems wrong. What Joey proposed -- copying a file if there are multiple hard-links -- seems like the right solution. - -Just recently I tried to unannex a large repository and was bitten by now-dangling symlinks to files that I couldn't locate anymore. The fact is that the current unannex operation is too dangerous to be useful. -"""]] |