diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/Missing_repo_uuid_after_local_pairing_with_older_annex/comment_1_8229df64a872bee7590f75eb78f78c4a._comment | 10 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Missing_repo_uuid_after_local_pairing_with_older_annex/comment_1_8229df64a872bee7590f75eb78f78c4a._comment b/doc/bugs/Missing_repo_uuid_after_local_pairing_with_older_annex/comment_1_8229df64a872bee7590f75eb78f78c4a._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..26881f17b --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Missing_repo_uuid_after_local_pairing_with_older_annex/comment_1_8229df64a872bee7590f75eb78f78c4a._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="4.152.108.193" + subject="comment 1" + date="2013-06-25T18:08:55Z" + content=""" +As far as I know, there have been no changes to the local pairing protocol that would cause a problem like this. 3.20121112 is a few months after local pairing was first developed. + +Have you tried upgrading and re-pairing? +"""]] |