diff options
author | anarcat <anarcat@web> | 2015-08-11 21:43:32 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | admin <admin@branchable.com> | 2015-08-11 21:43:32 +0000 |
commit | 07d844f8137ca7eb90b2b0f0f7399d1fa8cbe9f6 (patch) | |
tree | 2b6c620eb9379d06f34ed43d38d8d398a493d2f5 /doc | |
parent | f46b10937bd111529f0c9dde7c82eadc7c1ca582 (diff) |
Added a comment: still broken, imho - possible fixes and workarounds
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/weird_entry_in_process_list/comment_3_0b571abbd2fc18eabd053a07ab46e0fe._comment | 27 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/weird_entry_in_process_list/comment_3_0b571abbd2fc18eabd053a07ab46e0fe._comment b/doc/bugs/weird_entry_in_process_list/comment_3_0b571abbd2fc18eabd053a07ab46e0fe._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..21dd57534 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/weird_entry_in_process_list/comment_3_0b571abbd2fc18eabd053a07ab46e0fe._comment @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="anarcat" + subject="still broken, imho - possible fixes and workarounds" + date="2015-08-11T21:43:32Z" + content=""" +it doesn't look like this is really fixed now: + +<pre> +# ps axfuww | grep git-annex | head -1 +www-data 3277 0.1 0.5 704928 35804 ? Sl aoû07 11:11 /usr/lib/git-annex.linux/exe/git-annex --library-path /usr/lib/git-annex.linux//usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gconv:/usr/lib/git-annex.linux//usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/audit:/usr/lib/git-annex.linux//etc/ld.so.conf.d:/usr/lib/git-annex.linux//lib64:/usr/lib/git-annex.linux//usr/lib:/usr/lib/git-annex.linux//lib/x86_64-linux-gnu:/usr/lib/git-annex.linux//usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu: /usr/lib/git-annex.linux/shimmed/git-annex/git-annex assistant +</pre> + +this is pretty nasty... ;) i use this stupid sed trick to remove some of the noise: + +<pre> +# ps axfuww | sed -e 's/--library-path.*git-annex//'| grep annex | head -1 +www-data 3277 0.1 0.5 704928 35804 ? Sl aoû07 11:11 /usr/lib/git-annex.linux/exe/git-annex assistant +</pre> + +still.. it would be nice to be able to have a cleaner process table, especially since it seems the standalone build is pretty much a must nowadays. + +can we see what is the URL to that GHC bug report? + +there seems to be an horrible, C-based hack documented here that could help: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26657699/how-to-change-the-name-of-a-haskell-process-under-linux + +thanks! +"""]] |