summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>2011-03-17 20:36:25 -0400
committerGravatar Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>2011-03-17 20:36:25 -0400
commitbe27fa41fa3aff7fb0c455d51c7d67d7b4114b69 (patch)
treef70cf78e7b60fb4d5df3aa7492f15aa979c0085c /doc
parente31be22c12a0c69e17042138663cc6e9fa539db2 (diff)
response
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/check_for_curl_in_configure.hs.mdwn21
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/check_for_curl_in_configure.hs.mdwn b/doc/bugs/check_for_curl_in_configure.hs.mdwn
index bba2b81fc..2a5227491 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/check_for_curl_in_configure.hs.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/check_for_curl_in_configure.hs.mdwn
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+[[!meta title="arbitrary/configurable backends"]]
+
+(Retitling as this has drifted..)
+
+---
+
I thought this might be useful, since curl is being used for the URL backend, it might be worth checking for it's existence.
<pre>
@@ -32,6 +38,21 @@ index 772ba54..1a563e0 100644
>> grid storage system as the storage archive. It's just an idea as
>> I have seen it implemented quite well in irods.
+>>> I'm unsure about the idea of having a backend where that is
+>>> parameterized. It would mean that one annex's GENERIC-foo key
+>>> might be entirely different from another's key with the same backend
+>>> and details. And a misconfiguration could get data the wrong
+>>> way and get the wrong data, etc.
+>>>
+>>> I mostly look at the URL backend as an example that can be modified to
+>>> make this kind of custom backend. You already probably know enough to
+>>> make a TORRENT backend where keys are the urls to torrents to download
+>>> with `aria2c --follow-torrent=mem`.
+>>>
+>>> I am also interested in doing backends that use eg, cloud storage.
+>>> A S3 backend that could upload files to S3 in addition to downloading
+>>> them, for example, would be handy. --[[Joey]]
+
also in Backend/URL.hs is it worth making a minor change to the way curl is called (I'm not sure if the following is correct or not)
> It's correct, typewise, but I don't see any real reason to bother