diff options
author | Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> | 2011-03-17 20:36:25 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> | 2011-03-17 20:36:25 -0400 |
commit | be27fa41fa3aff7fb0c455d51c7d67d7b4114b69 (patch) | |
tree | f70cf78e7b60fb4d5df3aa7492f15aa979c0085c /doc | |
parent | e31be22c12a0c69e17042138663cc6e9fa539db2 (diff) |
response
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/check_for_curl_in_configure.hs.mdwn | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/check_for_curl_in_configure.hs.mdwn b/doc/bugs/check_for_curl_in_configure.hs.mdwn index bba2b81fc..2a5227491 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/check_for_curl_in_configure.hs.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/check_for_curl_in_configure.hs.mdwn @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +[[!meta title="arbitrary/configurable backends"]] + +(Retitling as this has drifted..) + +--- + I thought this might be useful, since curl is being used for the URL backend, it might be worth checking for it's existence. <pre> @@ -32,6 +38,21 @@ index 772ba54..1a563e0 100644 >> grid storage system as the storage archive. It's just an idea as >> I have seen it implemented quite well in irods. +>>> I'm unsure about the idea of having a backend where that is +>>> parameterized. It would mean that one annex's GENERIC-foo key +>>> might be entirely different from another's key with the same backend +>>> and details. And a misconfiguration could get data the wrong +>>> way and get the wrong data, etc. +>>> +>>> I mostly look at the URL backend as an example that can be modified to +>>> make this kind of custom backend. You already probably know enough to +>>> make a TORRENT backend where keys are the urls to torrents to download +>>> with `aria2c --follow-torrent=mem`. +>>> +>>> I am also interested in doing backends that use eg, cloud storage. +>>> A S3 backend that could upload files to S3 in addition to downloading +>>> them, for example, would be handy. --[[Joey]] + also in Backend/URL.hs is it worth making a minor change to the way curl is called (I'm not sure if the following is correct or not) > It's correct, typewise, but I don't see any real reason to bother |