diff options
| author |  Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name> | 2015-01-13 18:19:07 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name> | 2015-01-13 18:19:07 -0400 |
| commit | e8c8e506d696173512dd134766c9d7fc8ea63c32 (patch) | |
| tree | a24885cfdaf94b3a1a4d6dbc6b23a286860f8b30 /doc/todo | |
| parent | 507b05d294846c2680795e8bc4201f7669fe49f5 (diff) | |
close old todo; new style chunking fixed this
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/resuming_encrypted_uploads.mdwn | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/resuming_encrypted_uploads.mdwn b/doc/todo/resuming_encrypted_uploads.mdwn index b3aaa7f96..44a58a141 100644 --- a/doc/todo/resuming_encrypted_uploads.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/resuming_encrypted_uploads.mdwn @@ -20,3 +20,10 @@ sometimes need to manually dropunused old uploads, that never completed. The question, then, is whether resuming uploads is useful enough to add this overhead and user-visible complexity. --[[Joey]] + +> The new-style chunking code chunks and then encrypts. This means that +> each individual chunk is a stand-alone file that can be decrypted later, +> and so resumes of uploads to encrypted, chunked remotes works now. +> +> I think that's better than the ideas discussed above, so [[done]] +> --[[Joey]] |