summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/forum
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>2011-04-27 20:06:07 -0400
committerGravatar Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>2011-04-27 20:23:09 -0400
commite68f128a9bf46c8f4ebe51fcb3b6f63955cadd2e (patch)
tree2102052ed8289efa0e44b4f9269c423753d70983 /doc/forum
parent4381ac062fa7cec01476e84a7bd8e154efb8aacd (diff)
rsync special remote
Fully tested and working, including resuming and encryption. (Though not resuming when sending *with* encryption; gpg doesn't produce identical output each time.) Uses same layout as the directory special remote and the .git/annex/objects/ directory.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/forum')
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/wishlist:_special_remote_for_sftp_or_rsync.mdwn22
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/doc/forum/wishlist:_special_remote_for_sftp_or_rsync.mdwn b/doc/forum/wishlist:_special_remote_for_sftp_or_rsync.mdwn
index becfe23c7..9807bf91e 100644
--- a/doc/forum/wishlist:_special_remote_for_sftp_or_rsync.mdwn
+++ b/doc/forum/wishlist:_special_remote_for_sftp_or_rsync.mdwn
@@ -1,5 +1,21 @@
-i think it would be useful to have a fourth kind of [[special remote]]s that connects to a dumb storage using sftp or rsync. this can be emulated by using sshfs, but that means lots of round-trips through the system and is limited to platforms where sshfs is available.
+i think it would be useful to have a fourth kind of [[special remote]]s
+that connects to a dumb storage using sftp or rsync. this can be emulated
+by using sshfs, but that means lots of round-trips through the system and
+is limited to platforms where sshfs is available.
-typical use cases are backups to storate shared between a group of people where each user only has limited access (sftp or rsync), when using [[bup]] is not an option.
+typical use cases are backups to storate shared between a group of people
+where each user only has limited access (sftp or rsync), when using [[bup]]
+is not an option.
-an alternative to implementing yet another special remote would be to have some kind of plugin system by which external programs can provide an interface to key-value stores (i'd implement the sftp backend myself, but haven't learned haskell yet).
+an alternative to implementing yet another special remote would be to have
+some kind of plugin system by which external programs can provide an
+interface to key-value stores (i'd implement the sftp backend myself, but
+haven't learned haskell yet).
+
+> Ask and ye [[shall receive|special_remotes/rsync]].
+>
+> Sometimes I almost think that a generic configurable special remote that
+> just uses configured shell commands would be useful.. But there's really
+> no comparison with sitting down and writing code tuned to work with
+> a given transport like rsync, when it comes to reliability and taking
+> advantage of its abilities (like resuming). --[[Joey]]