diff options
author | Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name> | 2015-01-27 17:38:14 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name> | 2015-01-27 17:38:14 -0400 |
commit | 4b7c7fda1e719d1d1edfd1d5861b968a8feb8541 (patch) | |
tree | 93638291c8a92d870fb1985709648941e369bb05 /doc/devblog/day_248__workload_tuning.mdwn | |
parent | df81023501e2b0d930ec90cc6f5a6c6735f84818 (diff) |
devbog
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/devblog/day_248__workload_tuning.mdwn')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/devblog/day_248__workload_tuning.mdwn | 54 |
1 files changed, 54 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/devblog/day_248__workload_tuning.mdwn b/doc/devblog/day_248__workload_tuning.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4e106ef09 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/devblog/day_248__workload_tuning.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +Today I put together a lot of things I've been thinking about: + +* There's some evidence that git-annex needs tuning to handle some unusual + repositories. In particular very big repositories might benefit from + different object hashing. +* It's really hard to handle [[upgrades]] that change the fundamentals of + how git-annex repositories work. Such an upgrade would need every + git-annex user to upgrade their repository, and would be very painful. + It's hard to imagine a change that is worth that amount of pain. +* There are other changes some would like to see (like lower-case object + hash directory names) that are certianly not enough to warrant a flag + day repo format upgrade. +* It would be nice to let people who want to have some flexability to play + around with changes, in their own repos, as long as they don't a) + make git-annex a lot more complicated, or b) negatively impact others. + (Without having to fork git-annex.) + +This is discussed in more depth in [[design/v6]]. + +The solution, which I've built today, is support for +[[tuning]] settings, when a new repository is first created. The resulting +repository will be different in some significant way from a default +git-annex repository, but git-annex will support it just fine. + +The main limitations are: + +* You can't change the tuning of an existing repository + (unless a tool gets written to transition it). +* You absolutely don't want to merge repo B, which has been tuned in + nonstandard ways, into repo A which has not. Or A into B. (Unless you like + watching slow motion car crashes.) + +I built all the infrastructure for this today. Basically, the git-annex +branch gets a record of all tunings that have been applied, and they're +automatically propigated to new clones of a repository. + +And I implemented the first tunable setting: + + git -c annex.tune.objecthashlower=true annex init + +This is definitely an experimental feature for now. +`git-annex merge` and similar commands will detect attempts to merge +between incompatably tuned repositories, and error out. But, there are a +lot of ways to shoot yourself in the foot if you use this feature: + +* Nothing stops `git merge` from merging two incompatable repositories. +* Nothing stops any version of git-annex older from today from merging + either. + +Now that the groundwork is laid, I can pretty easily, and inexpensively, +add more tunable settings. The next two I plan to add are already +documented, `annex.tune.objecthashdirectories` and +`annex.tune.branchhashdirectories`. Most new tunables should take about 4 +lines of code to add to git-annex. |