diff options
author | Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> | 2012-09-07 18:04:41 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> | 2012-09-07 18:04:41 -0400 |
commit | 38c679d0c83285096051267b6428e1851c80247a (patch) | |
tree | e11bb627c12f2b5579a79307f9e34334a0f2e744 /doc/design/assistant/blog | |
parent | c28b54c4691f5a5dcab0411fb07e5b1d83565683 (diff) |
blog for the day
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/design/assistant/blog')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/design/assistant/blog/day_75__zeromq_and_pairing.mdwn | 50 |
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_75__zeromq_and_pairing.mdwn b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_75__zeromq_and_pairing.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9f2ba4816 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_75__zeromq_and_pairing.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +Started reading about ZeroMQ with the hope that it could do some firewall +traversal thing, to connect mutually-unroutable nodes. Well, it could, but +it'd need a proxy to run on a server both can contact, and lots of +users won't have a server to run that on. The XMPP approach used by +dvcs-autosync is looking like the likeliest way for git-annex to handle +that use case. + +However, ZeroMQ did point in promising directions to handle another use +case I need to support: Local [[pairing]]. In fairly short order, I got +ZeroMQ working over IP Multicast (PGM), with multiple publishers sending +messages that were all seen by multiple clients on the LAN (actually the +WAN; works over OpenVPN too). I had been thinking about using +Avahi/ZeroConf for discovery of systems to pair with, but ZeroMQ is rather +more portable and easy to work with. + +Unfortunatly, I wasn't able to get ZeroMQ to behave reliably enough. +It seems to have some timeout issues the way I'm trying to use it, +or perhaps its haskell bindings are buggy? Anyway, it's really overkill +to use PGM when all I need for git-annex pairing discovery is lossy +UDP Multicast. Haskell has a simple `network-multicast` library for that, +and it works great. + +With discovery out of the way (theoretically), the hard part about +[[pairing]] is going to be verifying that the desired repository is being +paired with, and not some imposter. My plan to deal with this involves a +shared secret, that can be communicated out of band, and HMAC. The webapp +will prompt both parties to enter the same agreed upon secret (which could +be any phrase, ideally with 64 bytes of entropy), and will then use it as +the key for HMAC on the ssh public key. The digest will be sent over the +wire, along with the ssh public key, and the other side can use the shared +secret to verifiy the key is correct. + +The other hard part about [[pairing]] will be finding the best address to +use for git, etc to connect to the other host. If MDNS is available, it's +ideal, but if not the pair may have to rely on local DNS, or even +hard-coded IPs, which will be much less robust. Or, the assistant could +broadcast queries for a peer's current IP address itself, as a poor man's +MDNS. + +All right then! That looks like a good week's worth of work to embark on. + +--- + +Slight detour to package the haskell network-multicast library and upload +to Debian unstable. + +Roughed out a data type that models the whole pairing conversation, +and can be serialized to implement it. And a state machine to run +that conversation. Not yet hooked up to any transport such as multicast +UDP. |