responsen

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/doc/bugs/fsck_claims_failed_checksum_when_less_copies_than_required_are_found.mdwn b/doc/bugs/fsck_claims_failed_checksum_when_less_copies_than_required_are_found.mdwn
index a5bde3c1a..3f1d28d3d 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/fsck_claims_failed_checksum_when_less_copies_than_required_are_found.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/fsck_claims_failed_checksum_when_less_copies_than_required_are_found.mdwn
@@ -7,5 +7,12 @@
 > it says "fsck foo", the output is pertaining to some other file than foo.
 > As far as I can see, there is no bug here. --[[Joey]]
 
->> Sorry, I thought it would be obvious, but that's no excuse for not providing additional explanation.
->> The problem is that fsck tells me a file's fsck has failed without printing extra details. In this case, the checksum is OK while I don't have enough copies to satisfy the fsck. The fact that I don't have enough copies is obviously relevant, but I would still like to know if the checksums are OK. -- Richard
+>> Sorry, I thought it would be obvious, but that's no excuse for not
+>> providing additional explanation. The problem is that fsck tells me a
+>> file's fsck has failed without printing extra details. In this case, the
+>> checksum is OK while I don't have enough copies to satisfy the fsck. The
+>> fact that I don't have enough copies is obviously relevant, but I would
+>> still like to know if the checksums are OK. -- Richard
+
+>>> I think you're misreading the truncated output you posted. The actual,
+>>> full output would make much more sense. --[[Joey]]