Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com

10 files changed, 101 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/doc/bugs/WebDAV_HandshakeFailed_/comment_7_6c51b6c7dd477d8911dd9a7a5c41ea2e._comment b/doc/bugs/WebDAV_HandshakeFailed_/comment_7_6c51b6c7dd477d8911dd9a7a5c41ea2e._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9a7036ff0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/WebDAV_HandshakeFailed_/comment_7_6c51b6c7dd477d8911dd9a7a5c41ea2e._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="annexuser"
+ ip="50.46.189.77"
+ subject="comment 7"
+ date="2013-03-17T01:29:48Z"
+ content="""
+It's working now! Thanks!
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/uploads_queued_to_annex-ignore_remotes.mdwn b/doc/bugs/uploads_queued_to_annex-ignore_remotes.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..549147dcc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/uploads_queued_to_annex-ignore_remotes.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+## What steps will reproduce the problem?
+
+After the assistant idles for a while, it queues many transfers to remotes configured annex-ignore=true
+
+##What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
+
+No attempts to upload to repos marked 'annex-ignore=true'
+
+Instead I see many queued transfers to the remote 'origin'
+
+[Screenshot](https://www.evernote.com/shard/s1/sh/ea0de76c-4b68-4266-b9f6-8a9c343997b6/72baab4a3ce73b0915b151829bbeaf75/res/8a8ab1fb-3173-47ea-875d-b0e320cb827b/skitch.png)
+
+##What version of git-annex are you using? On what operating system?
+
+    %  > git annex version
+    git-annex version: 4.20130315
+    local repository version: 3
+    default repository version: 3
+    supported repository versions: 3 4
+    upgrade supported from repository versions: 0 1 2
+    build flags: Assistant Webapp Pairing Testsuite S3 WebDAV FsEvents XMPP DNS
+
+Mac OSX 10.8.2 Build 12C3006
+
+##Please provide any additional information below.
+
+The remote in question:
+
+    [remote "origin"]
+      url = git@git.example.com:annex-home
+      fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
+      annex-ignore = true
diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_1_299462bcdd0e4f6cd7895b5f40ca00ad._comment b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_1_299462bcdd0e4f6cd7895b5f40ca00ad._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7d28cfdbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_1_299462bcdd0e4f6cd7895b5f40ca00ad._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnR7hb8IaKB3IKZptRukje0yahmhfLOO98"
+ nickname="Adam"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2013-03-17T00:30:26Z"
+ content="""
+> Made UI changes to encourage user to install git-annex on the server when adding a ssh server, rather than just funneling them through to rsync.
+
+What's the difference between having git-annex available versus not?
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_2_1913d65dfe4ba08379d82a4a2ca91c40._comment b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_2_1913d65dfe4ba08379d82a4a2ca91c40._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..200846545
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_2_1913d65dfe4ba08379d82a4a2ca91c40._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnxp2XU8gIribhhGhGuYtU6eMMwHv5gUGI"
+ nickname="Amitai"
+ subject="Google Talk silently drops non-Google invites (at least)"
+ date="2013-03-17T13:44:18Z"
+ content="""
+Have you seen <http://www.fsf.org/blogs/sysadmin/google-backslides-on-federated-instant-messaging-on-purpose>? Maybe they're also doing other funny stuff that gets in your way.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__.mdwn b/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d719b2feb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Is there a way to check if a special remote is setup to use GPG? And, if so, see the ID of keys that it is encrypting to?
diff --git a/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__/comment_1_db8ce8ef50fc33a28860ee475988450f._comment b/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__/comment_1_db8ce8ef50fc33a28860ee475988450f._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ff073cd9a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__/comment_1_db8ce8ef50fc33a28860ee475988450f._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2013-03-17T18:59:40Z"
+ content="""
+You can tell this by looking at remote.log:
+
+git show git-annex:remote.log
+
+Remotes that are encrypted will have a big \"cipher=\" block in there, and ones that are encrypted to gpg public keys will have a list of the keys following \"cipherkeys=\"
+
+
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/Howto_remove_a_repository__63__/comment_1_b55fa4e92bb457ecaa5ca8f5cee7be1d._comment b/doc/forum/Howto_remove_a_repository__63__/comment_1_b55fa4e92bb457ecaa5ca8f5cee7be1d._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..642da6575
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Howto_remove_a_repository__63__/comment_1_b55fa4e92bb457ecaa5ca8f5cee7be1d._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2013-03-17T19:05:27Z"
+ content="""
+There's no UI for it in the assistant. [[Relevant bug report|bugs/The_webapp_doesn't_allow_deleting_repositories]]
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__.mdwn b/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..60942584b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+I have the webapp setup to manage 4 different repositories.
+
+One repository had many gigabytes to upload to a remote. As this was moving along, I wanted to check on the status of one of the other repositories. I knew that this second repository had a lot of data to download. When I switched to the second repo in the webapp, I noticed in my network monitor that the amount of upstream bandwidth I was using dropped and the amount of downstream bandwidth increased. I switched back to the first repo, and my downstream bandwidth dropped and the upstream bandwidth increased.
+
+It looks like git-annex stopped uploading data from the first repo when I switched to the second, and stopped downloading data to the second repo when I switched to the first. Is this correct? I was under the impression that switching repositories in the webapp simply changed the view that I was looking at, but that the assistant would still be managing all the repositories I had setup -- uploading/downloading/syncing concurrently.
diff --git a/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__/comment_1_ebec1ddad71e961cdc9b21cbddfbcdaf._comment b/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__/comment_1_ebec1ddad71e961cdc9b21cbddfbcdaf._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c1c5cd917
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__/comment_1_ebec1ddad71e961cdc9b21cbddfbcdaf._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2013-03-17T18:53:26Z"
+ content="""
+Each repository gets its own git-annex assistant daemon, which is entirely separate from the daemons used by other repositories. 
+
+The only affect that switching which repository is in view in the webapp can have is it can start a daemon running on a repository that for some reason did not already have the daemon running. This could happen if it was not set to autostart on login, for example.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/Post-Kickstarter.mdwn b/doc/forum/Post-Kickstarter.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d774ca25b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Post-Kickstarter.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+We're nearing the end of the year of development funded by Kickstarter. I'm curious to know what the future of the project looks like.
+
+I assume that development will decrease from its current levels as you focus more of your energy on activities that put bread on the table, but is git-annex still something that you foresee actively working on or will it be in more of a feature-freeze-bug-fix stage?
+
+As a backer my only regret is that during the campaign I wasn't able to donate as much as I would have liked. The project has exceeded my expectations since then. I don't know that another Kickstarter campaign is worth the effort, but if you were to ask for donations to fund another month or two or three I would gladly donate. Or perhaps implement a feature-bounty program where users could donate money toward development of a particular feature they would like to see added. Or perhaps you're sick of working for the Internet!