summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar annexuser <annexuser@web>2016-11-27 20:39:26 +0000
committerGravatar admin <admin@branchable.com>2016-11-27 20:39:26 +0000
commit687fe308e5d9016c77ede6cef25b643379dc7bf9 (patch)
tree830b262039d6b3139e57553d7a7a2433f2e05dbd
parentfb90cd6048cfa6b15e513ca363048eda2e52f438 (diff)
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/Preserving_Directories_in_Metadata_Views.mdwn47
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/forum/Preserving_Directories_in_Metadata_Views.mdwn b/doc/forum/Preserving_Directories_in_Metadata_Views.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dfc45cb4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Preserving_Directories_in_Metadata_Views.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+I want to use metadata views to sort files into top-level directories based on a tag, but then preserve the directory structure underneath that. I'm having trouble with this.
+
+Say I have an annex at `~/annex` with a structure like this:
+
+ $ tree
+ .
+ ├── foo
+ │   └── bar
+ │   ├── one.txt
+ │   ├── three.txt
+ │   └── two.txt
+ └── waldo
+ └── fred
+ ├── a.txt
+ ├── b.txt
+ └── c.txt
+
+I tag some of the files with `blah`:
+
+ $ git annex metadata -t blah foo/bar/*
+
+Now I want to change my view to only see those files with a certain tag, but I want to maintain their directory structure, ie I want to end up with something like this:
+
+ $ tree
+ .
+ ├── blah
+ │   └── foo
+ │   └── bar
+ │   ├── one.txt
+ │   ├── three.txt
+ │   └── two.txt
+
+If I do `git annex view blah` I see the files `one.txt`, `two.txt` and `three.txt` but they are in the top level of `~/annex`. The `foo` and `bar` directories are not present.
+
+If I do `git annex view blah "/=*"` then the files I present under the `foo` directory, but the `bar` subdirectory is not there.
+
+It would also be fine if I could just hide the files that did not have the `blah` tag, so that I ended up with this:
+
+ $ tree
+ .
+ ├── foo
+ │   └── bar
+ │   ├── one.txt
+ │   ├── three.txt
+ │   └── two.txt
+
+Is something like this possible?