diff options
author | 2012-10-05 11:00:01 -0400 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2012-10-05 11:00:01 -0400 | |
commit | d664d0af0821759f20ff50fa344e52c6cb871ab0 (patch) | |
tree | 5708fec28bdf7461e9e1c27d8ac426d5c17e5204 | |
parent | 45dc6436ad9a4bea4a516c61004f46edad7992d9 (diff) | |
parent | be31f381c4f9706ef391ba5eb7f14412e3e1e348 (diff) |
Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com
4 files changed, 34 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_98__preferred_content/comment_1_2136618e3515d0ac6369a41f1934ec2a._comment b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_98__preferred_content/comment_1_2136618e3515d0ac6369a41f1934ec2a._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b0fcd8c79 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_98__preferred_content/comment_1_2136618e3515d0ac6369a41f1934ec2a._comment @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://meep.pl/" + ip="193.23.174.18" + subject="Ah, the barber paradox" + date="2012-10-05T06:51:11Z" + content=""" +Nice. Would (not in=here) be the simplest paradoxical expression? + +Is just disregarding the target repo completely during checks a possibility? This would interpret (not copies=trusted:X) as \"not in X *other* trusted repositories, no matter whether we are trusted or not\", and (not in=here) just as \"true\". I think this should generally arrive at the same results as the option 2., but by definition of the expression meaing, not by rewriting. + +Alternative 3 (or is my wording different enough to be 3a?) - check that the invariant \"we have all the known files matching our PCE and only these files\" would hold after an operation before actually performing it - could be bistable if done both for gets and drops: + +* (not in=here) and we do not have the file -> get thinks \"if we get it, we have a file not matching the PCE\" -> get does not get it; +* (not in=here) and we do have the file -> drop thinks \"if we drop it, there exists a file matching the PCE which we miss\" -> drop does not drop it. + +This is not necessarily bad. Checking just for drops should be monostable, I guess, but doesn't it look a bit arbitrary? (Though it would be again equivalent to option 2, wouldn't it? So maybe not that arbitrary.) +"""]] diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/desymlink/comment_3_538561d74371e53c2f8df7f5ebdf58a8._comment b/doc/design/assistant/desymlink/comment_3_538561d74371e53c2f8df7f5ebdf58a8._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..40067b25b --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/assistant/desymlink/comment_3_538561d74371e53c2f8df7f5ebdf58a8._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="4.154.0.149" + subject="comment 3" + date="2012-10-05T00:43:11Z" + content=""" +@Glen, for what it's worth, you can now manually \"git annex unlock\" a file and it'll stay unlocked until you manually \"git annex add\" the new version. +"""]] diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn b/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn index 8661dca8e..316921dd3 100644 --- a/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn +++ b/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ locally paired systems, and remote servers with rsync. Help me prioritize my work: What special remote would you most like to use with the git-annex assistant? -[[!poll open=yes 14 "Amazon S3 (done)" 9 "Amazon Glacier" 6 "Box.com" 51 "My phone (or MP3 player)" 7 "Tahoe-LAFS" 3 "OpenStack SWIFT" 14 "Google Drive"]] +[[!poll open=yes 14 "Amazon S3 (done)" 9 "Amazon Glacier" 6 "Box.com" 52 "My phone (or MP3 player)" 7 "Tahoe-LAFS" 3 "OpenStack SWIFT" 14 "Google Drive"]] This poll is ordered with the options I consider easiest to build listed first. Mostly because git-annex already supports them and they diff --git a/doc/forum/special_remote_for_iPods/comment_1_37cc3dc740341cc663074fd3bfb85947._comment b/doc/forum/special_remote_for_iPods/comment_1_37cc3dc740341cc663074fd3bfb85947._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..35ac105c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/special_remote_for_iPods/comment_1_37cc3dc740341cc663074fd3bfb85947._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="4.154.0.149" + subject="comment 1" + date="2012-10-05T00:39:43Z" + content=""" +I've been thinking in similar directions on this page: [[design/assistant/desymlink]] +"""]] |