Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com

3 files changed, 19 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn b/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn
index ffc37dcb1..ed0205379 100644
--- a/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn
+++ b/doc/design/assistant/polls/prioritizing_special_remotes.mdwn
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ locally paired systems, and remote servers with rsync.
 Help me prioritize my work: What special remote would you most like
 to use with the git-annex assistant?
 
-[[!poll open=yes 5 "Amazon S3" 5 "Box.com" 15 "My phone (or MP3 player)" 0 "Tahoe-LAFS" 1 "OpenStack SWIFT" 1 "Google Drive" 2 "Amazon Glacier"]]
+[[!poll open=yes 5 "Amazon S3" 5 "Box.com" 19 "My phone (or MP3 player)" 1 "Tahoe-LAFS" 1 "OpenStack SWIFT" 5 "Google Drive" 3 "Amazon Glacier"]]
 
 This poll is ordered with the options I consider easiest to build
 listed first. Mostly because git-annex already supports them and they
diff --git a/doc/forum/Weird_behavior_with_OS_X_Finder_and_Preview.app/comment_5_e0eec765f72f7bf6f5a2a92c9b5dacad._comment b/doc/forum/Weird_behavior_with_OS_X_Finder_and_Preview.app/comment_5_e0eec765f72f7bf6f5a2a92c9b5dacad._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..254a524aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Weird_behavior_with_OS_X_Finder_and_Preview.app/comment_5_e0eec765f72f7bf6f5a2a92c9b5dacad._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="4.153.8.30"
+ subject="comment 5"
+ date="2012-09-14T04:20:27Z"
+ content="""
+Good catch, I've made it verify the old checksum first.
+
++/- E migrations are not currently optimised.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/todo/special_remote_for_amazon_glacier/comment_1_68f129441eefcbfebf7a9db680f52759._comment b/doc/todo/special_remote_for_amazon_glacier/comment_1_68f129441eefcbfebf7a9db680f52759._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..68593be42
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/todo/special_remote_for_amazon_glacier/comment_1_68f129441eefcbfebf7a9db680f52759._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://mike.magin.org/"
+ nickname="mmagin"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2012-09-14T04:19:53Z"
+ content="""
+When I first heard about Glacier, it sounded great for a cheap backup copy, and I was thinking about writing a \"hook\" remote, but once I read some better analysis of the pricing (e.g. [[http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2012-09-04-thoughts-on-glacier-pricing.html]]) I rapidly lost interest.
+"""]]