diff options
| author |  dav02.git@4d920fe040aa5df86fcd9f4dd57d3fcf85ee5641 <dav02git@web> | 2017-05-18 11:44:54 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |  admin <admin@branchable.com> | 2017-05-18 11:44:54 +0000 |
| commit | 46b63cfc136c73bf813f34ec99eebfa1c9e9a86e (patch) | |
| tree | 7c3645e111fcb9a2d193ccc02c784c893c4a17c6 | |
| parent | 9874666c0e08db62fb9c944264c7a24322324cd6 (diff) | |
update links
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/forum/treat_directory_with_multiple_files_as_a_single_item.mdwn | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/forum/treat_directory_with_multiple_files_as_a_single_item.mdwn b/doc/forum/treat_directory_with_multiple_files_as_a_single_item.mdwn index f91cfb308..7fb96316a 100644 --- a/doc/forum/treat_directory_with_multiple_files_as_a_single_item.mdwn +++ b/doc/forum/treat_directory_with_multiple_files_as_a_single_item.mdwn @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -In my analyses I often have multiple generated (>10k) small files in a single directory. +In my analyses I often have multiple (>10k) generated small files in a single directory. -I would like to store this in git annex, in order to version them and probably even synchronize. The problem is that if a huge number of files is stored inside the repository, the repository itself becomes huge and slow. There are some ways to improve the performance ([[tips/Repositories_with_large_number_of_files]], [[forum/Handling_a_large_number_of_files]], [[forum/__34__git_annex_sync__34___synced_after_8_hours]]), but it doesn't solve the issue completely. +I would like to store this in git annex, in order to version them and probably even synchronize. The problem is that if a huge number of files is stored inside the repository, the repository itself becomes huge and slow. There are some ways to improve the performance ([[1|tips/Repositories_with_large_number_of_files]], [[2|forum/Handling_a_large_number_of_files]], [[3|forum/__34__git_annex_sync__34___synced_after_8_hours]]), but it doesn't solve the issue completely. I was wondering if it is possible to force git annex to treat a single directory as one item in history? Probably with abandoning the checksum verification. |