diff options
author | gernot <gernot@web> | 2011-04-23 16:02:42 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | admin <admin@branchable.com> | 2011-04-23 16:02:42 +0000 |
commit | a03dc49bb21190bd2823df9d6b99b04158a955ee (patch) | |
tree | 326a2718d2b77f3e8e96505473e0babf76fdfc5f | |
parent | 028b338c29fa26a3a821fd79172bc8a42a23387a (diff) |
-rw-r--r-- | doc/forum/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files.mdwn | 18 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/forum/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files.mdwn b/doc/forum/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..156cfb009 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/wishlist:_define_remotes_that_must_have_all_files.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +I would like to be able to name a few remotes that must retain *all* annexed +files. `git-annex fsck` should warn me if any files are missing from those +remotes, even if `annex.numcopies` has been satisfied by other remotes. + +I imagine this could also be useful for bup remotes, but I haven't actually +looked at those yet. + +Based on existing output, this is what a warning message could look like: + + fsck FILE + 3 of 3 trustworthy copies of FILE exist. + FILE is, however, still missing from these required remotes: + UUID -- Backup Drive 1 + UUID -- Backup Drive 2 + Back it up with git-annex copy. + Warning + +What do you think? |