summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>2017-02-26 14:55:11 -0400
committerGravatar Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>2017-02-26 14:55:11 -0400
commitff3f431794d2fd6e1754d70f3e316327fc95ae09 (patch)
tree3e0cd8fc76ee052acee41db7250e135843291c2d
parent553ed7fc4e16e6bc52b86e3324e9e1d7f9bd18c8 (diff)
parent893d8ea19df7292a03d9b570816519841b8f7448 (diff)
Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/S3_remote___8212___un-embedding_creds__63__/comment_2_282aaaed5e95e8062460f94ac3a68dea._comment14
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__.mdwn7
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_1_b96bb95cdbbc78c0b4b348861e2264bd._comment8
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_2_539a33b268be5c6954f3112d89dd34ef._comment10
4 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/S3_remote___8212___un-embedding_creds__63__/comment_2_282aaaed5e95e8062460f94ac3a68dea._comment b/doc/bugs/S3_remote___8212___un-embedding_creds__63__/comment_2_282aaaed5e95e8062460f94ac3a68dea._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9c2e141f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/S3_remote___8212___un-embedding_creds__63__/comment_2_282aaaed5e95e8062460f94ac3a68dea._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="michalrus"
+ avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/83c0b6e7f9d20f09a892263c4903bbae"
+ subject="comment 2"
+ date="2017-02-25T18:47:35Z"
+ content="""
+Sure, that’s what I did at the very beginning (revoking the creds on AWS).
+
+But still, when I clone this repo, `git annex info S3` in this fresh clone, says that credentials are embedded. This is a bit misleading.
+
+Maybe updating S3 configuration with `embedcreds=no` could change that behavior?
+
+It wouldn’t matter from the security standpoint (which is solved by changing permissions directly on AWS), but would simply be beneficial for usability. =)
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__.mdwn b/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fb3c9d01e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+Hello!
+
+I’ve got two repos, both are using git-annex.
+
+Can I somehow merge them together, into one?
+
+Thank you!
diff --git a/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_1_b96bb95cdbbc78c0b4b348861e2264bd._comment b/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_1_b96bb95cdbbc78c0b4b348861e2264bd._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..46be89f73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_1_b96bb95cdbbc78c0b4b348861e2264bd._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="openmedi"
+ avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/563ffaff3b492c579bd8f094472e4506"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2017-02-25T20:35:52Z"
+ content="""
+I think you could add those two repositories as remotes of each other and merge them with the `--allow-unrelated-histories` option. But I'm not sure if this is a good idea, or not. But some googling in that direction might yield some useful information. Good luck!
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_2_539a33b268be5c6954f3112d89dd34ef._comment b/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_2_539a33b268be5c6954f3112d89dd34ef._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5059bc45d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Merging_two_git-annex_repositories_together__63__/comment_2_539a33b268be5c6954f3112d89dd34ef._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="michalrus"
+ avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/83c0b6e7f9d20f09a892263c4903bbae"
+ subject="comment 2"
+ date="2017-02-26T00:59:21Z"
+ content="""
+No, actually everything just works. ♥
+
+It’s amazing! Thank you!
+"""]]