Merge remote-tracking branch 'branchable/master'

2 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_3_e1f39c4af5bdb0daabf000da80858cd9._comment b/doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_3_e1f39c4af5bdb0daabf000da80858cd9._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c5bb26f59
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_3_e1f39c4af5bdb0daabf000da80858cd9._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 3"
+ date="2011-03-30T18:15:18Z"
+ content="""
+Yes, encrypting the symmetric key with users' regular gpg keys is the plan.
+
+I don't think that encryption of content in a git annex remote makes much sense; the filenames obviously cannot be encrypted there. It's more likely that the same encryption would get used for a bup remote, or with the [[special_remotes/directory]] remote I threw in today.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_4_bb6b814ab961818d514f6553455d2bf3._comment b/doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_4_bb6b814ab961818d514f6553455d2bf3._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..09b7a8b1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_4_bb6b814ab961818d514f6553455d2bf3._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
+ nickname="Richard"
+ subject="comment 4"
+ date="2011-03-30T18:20:56Z"
+ content="""
+Picking up the automagic encryption idea for annex remotes, this would allow you to host a branchable-esque git-annex hosting service. (Nexenta with ZFS is a cheap and reliable option until btrfs becomes stable in a year or five).
+"""]]