diff options
| author |  Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name> | 2015-03-16 13:53:52 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name> | 2015-03-16 13:53:52 -0400 |
| commit | 5451916539f7cb6159cb6507a15b0a878e61ebd3 (patch) | |
| tree | 94d3dc4b54f572bdd805848ab025b233d5430b76 | |
| parent | 26d33ba5c10f34e0983c53e801fea17765630417 (diff) | |
filed bug on haskell aws to support this
3 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/forum/Can__39__t_create_remote_for_Goo*/comment_1_6227a28cd0c848cc1479d17fd48d37d5._comment b/doc/forum/Can__39__t_create_remote_for_Goo*/comment_1_6227a28cd0c848cc1479d17fd48d37d5._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cdfb24685 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Can__39__t_create_remote_for_Goo*/comment_1_6227a28cd0c848cc1479d17fd48d37d5._comment @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2015-03-16T17:43:44Z" + content=""" +Ok, the problem here is that Aws.S3.Core.StorageClass currently only +offers Standard | ReducedRedundancy | Glacier. + +To support this google thing, the library needs to be expanded. +I have filed a request for that here: + +<https://github.com/aristidb/aws/issues/155> +"""]] diff --git a/doc/todo/Nearline_support.mdwn b/doc/todo/Nearline_support.mdwn index 2c9947830..0364f501f 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Nearline_support.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Nearline_support.mdwn @@ -2,3 +2,5 @@ This has been described as Google's [[special_remotes/glacier]]. * [Announcement](http://googlecloudplatform.blogspot.in/2015/03/introducing-Google-Cloud-Storage-Nearline-near-online-data-at-an-offline-price.html) * <https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/nearline-storage> + +> [[dup|done]] --[[Joey]] diff --git a/doc/todo/Nearline_support/comment_1_185e4cce55ac26756e74c668d0fe2a8c._comment b/doc/todo/Nearline_support/comment_1_185e4cce55ac26756e74c668d0fe2a8c._comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..48b571cb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/Nearline_support/comment_1_185e4cce55ac26756e74c668d0fe2a8c._comment @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2015-03-16T17:47:18Z" + content=""" +I have not read anything about this yet, but there is another bug report +which seems to indicate that the S3 interface could be used with git-annex, +if it were possible to set storageclass=NEARLINE, which it is currently +not due to a limitation with the aws library git-annex is using. + +<> + +So, I think I'll close this todo as a dup of that. +"""]] |