summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>2015-02-16 19:38:19 -0400
committerGravatar Joey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>2015-02-16 19:38:19 -0400
commitbaab4c2023c7bce2d4c5d7f8799e28ac59dd4583 (patch)
treefda26d0ca2a2707e19323ca7e260a2f9d1439830
parent4b67ae596a133d285cc28593e26c47e5b14720c3 (diff)
parent74d8e9849e28f98c85e6265a58eb10884d0a9218 (diff)
Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com
-rw-r--r--doc/devblog/day_253__sqlite_for_incremental_fsck/comment_1_683d669ac6af8e314585609f75cfdaf3._comment7
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/canceling_wrong_repository_merge/comment_2_87aabff41a1c6aec773b8f52ead51105._comment11
2 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/devblog/day_253__sqlite_for_incremental_fsck/comment_1_683d669ac6af8e314585609f75cfdaf3._comment b/doc/devblog/day_253__sqlite_for_incremental_fsck/comment_1_683d669ac6af8e314585609f75cfdaf3._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..17d1d11cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/devblog/day_253__sqlite_for_incremental_fsck/comment_1_683d669ac6af8e314585609f75cfdaf3._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2015-02-16T21:26:22Z"
+ content="""
+i am curious: why separate database files while you can have multiple tables in the same database file? --[[anarcat]]
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/canceling_wrong_repository_merge/comment_2_87aabff41a1c6aec773b8f52ead51105._comment b/doc/forum/canceling_wrong_repository_merge/comment_2_87aabff41a1c6aec773b8f52ead51105._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..83d5c4834
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/canceling_wrong_repository_merge/comment_2_87aabff41a1c6aec773b8f52ead51105._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat"
+ subject="watch out for direct mode"
+ date="2015-02-16T23:22:19Z"
+ content="""
+so while `git rebase` can do magic, it will not work out of the box on direct mode repositories, unless you use `-c core.bare=false`, in which case you will totally shoot yourself in the foot because git will happily remove all those real files sitting in the checkout. you will need to `git annex indirect` before you do any of that magic. working on a clone of the git repo is also a good idea, if only for testing.
+
+i personnally destroyed my whole music collection doing such a cleanup of the history. fortunately, i had a recent archived clone of the repo, so things weren't so bad.
+
+but watch out for direct mode, as always.
+"""]]