Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com

8 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/doc/bugs/Crash_when_disabling_syncing_in_the_webapp/comment_3_0667f39f60bdaba6670f5b8304a8a77c._comment b/doc/bugs/Crash_when_disabling_syncing_in_the_webapp/comment_3_0667f39f60bdaba6670f5b8304a8a77c._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..60f82a5b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/Crash_when_disabling_syncing_in_the_webapp/comment_3_0667f39f60bdaba6670f5b8304a8a77c._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="209.250.56.244"
+ subject="comment 3"
+ date="2014-04-02T20:38:12Z"
+ content="""
+So we have the same version of git-annex from the same build, and only you see the problem. Hmm..
+
+You mentioned that you see the problem if you disable syncing at a particular time. Does it only crash at that time, or at any time?
+
+If you create a brand new empty repository and run the webapp in it, can you reporoduce the problem there? Ie, \"mkdir test; cd test; git init; git annex init; git annex webapp\"
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Race_condition_between_watch__47__assistant_and_addurl/comment_2_46dc67bdcd174cd50ccc421ec56735ad._comment b/doc/bugs/Race_condition_between_watch__47__assistant_and_addurl/comment_2_46dc67bdcd174cd50ccc421ec56735ad._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ec3c974d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/Race_condition_between_watch__47__assistant_and_addurl/comment_2_46dc67bdcd174cd50ccc421ec56735ad._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="209.250.56.244"
+ subject="comment 2"
+ date="2014-04-02T20:17:19Z"
+ content="""
+These races look beniegn, as far as I can see it doesn't cause any data to be lost, or indeed anything to happen that wouldn't have happened if addurl had been run without the assistant running.
+
+The first race probably has addurl and the assistant both trying to move the file object into the annex at the same time. One wins and moves it; the other loses and sulks.
+
+The second race has addurl trying to `git add` the file, while the assistant has already noticed the file appeared, `git add`ed it, and committed the add.
+
+The only way to really avoid these races would be to add a lot of lock checking. Or just make `git annex addurl` and presumably also `git annex add` and maybe several other commands refuse to run when the assistant is running.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Use_a_git_repository_on_the_server_don__39__t_work/comment_9_9100031689eaa460791191d9bfb746d8._comment b/doc/bugs/Use_a_git_repository_on_the_server_don__39__t_work/comment_9_9100031689eaa460791191d9bfb746d8._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6fa440f23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/Use_a_git_repository_on_the_server_don__39__t_work/comment_9_9100031689eaa460791191d9bfb746d8._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="209.250.56.244"
+ subject="comment 9"
+ date="2014-04-02T19:46:36Z"
+ content="""
+Sorry, but this bug report is closed. If you think you have a bug in git-annex, file a *new* bug report with full details for how I can reproduce it.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/ssh_keys_have_wrong_permissions___40__Ubuntu_12.04_LTS__44___current_linux_build_as_of_Mar_6th___39__14__41__/comment_1_462c377dca2484e5598a0b71d91ab64a._comment b/doc/bugs/ssh_keys_have_wrong_permissions___40__Ubuntu_12.04_LTS__44___current_linux_build_as_of_Mar_6th___39__14__41__/comment_1_462c377dca2484e5598a0b71d91ab64a._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..92dbf283c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/ssh_keys_have_wrong_permissions___40__Ubuntu_12.04_LTS__44___current_linux_build_as_of_Mar_6th___39__14__41__/comment_1_462c377dca2484e5598a0b71d91ab64a._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="209.250.56.244"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2014-04-02T19:53:04Z"
+ content="""
+This is a duplicate of [[bugs/ssh:_unprotected_private_key_file]], which was fixed on March 14th.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/2_clients_using_an_encrypted_server_for_syncing_-_possible__63__/comment_6_9b90b4031a5ed26c375903b33ed65a10._comment b/doc/forum/2_clients_using_an_encrypted_server_for_syncing_-_possible__63__/comment_6_9b90b4031a5ed26c375903b33ed65a10._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5fc4286b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/2_clients_using_an_encrypted_server_for_syncing_-_possible__63__/comment_6_9b90b4031a5ed26c375903b33ed65a10._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="209.250.56.244"
+ subject="comment 6"
+ date="2014-04-02T20:11:35Z"
+ content="""
+@Adam, an encrypted special remote does not contain the git repository (the gcrypt special remote is an exception to this rule). So you need to use another method to sync the git repository between machines.
+
+@Stein Roald once you have a clone of the git repository, you have the information that git-annex needs in able to get files from encrypted special remotes.
+
+Question 1: While gcrypt supports multi-key setups, when you use the git-annex assistant to set up a gcrypt remote it only sets it up to use one key. It's left to you to arrange for this key to be on every computer that needs it. Or use command-line stuff to add additional keys later.
+
+Question 2: You can certianly use the assistant to set up syncing between computers, but the only setup that currently provides 100% end-to-end enctyption of the git repository is using gcrypt. (Special remotes are 100% end-to-end encrypted, but as I've stated several times, do not contain the git repository data.)
+Since you seemed to want 100% end to end encryption I suggested using gcrypt. There are simpler setups, like using XMPP, that encrypt everything but not end-to-end, so the XMPP server could snoop on it.
+
+If you loose your computer, you can get your files back from any other device where you've set up a clone of that repository. A backup drive, another computer , etc. 
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/ignore_changes_made_by_a_remote/comment_1_825676069d2e1554499b76fd8c306c30._comment b/doc/forum/ignore_changes_made_by_a_remote/comment_1_825676069d2e1554499b76fd8c306c30._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8abc059f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/ignore_changes_made_by_a_remote/comment_1_825676069d2e1554499b76fd8c306c30._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="209.250.56.244"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2014-04-02T20:02:19Z"
+ content="""
+I don't see any need to scrap the repository. Since you have an indirect mode repsitory, you can use `git log` in there to find commits you don't like, and run `git revert` to revert them. So if a bad commit comes down from windows, you can just undo it. That's why we use git, yes?
+
+I'm much more curious about the circumstances that cause empty files to end up in the direct mode repository. 
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/rsync.net:_Too_many_authentication_failures_for___42____42____42____42____42__/comment_2_04e1da4352ef9f9be90253ea726e5f24._comment b/doc/forum/rsync.net:_Too_many_authentication_failures_for___42____42____42____42____42__/comment_2_04e1da4352ef9f9be90253ea726e5f24._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3181c4fe0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/rsync.net:_Too_many_authentication_failures_for___42____42____42____42____42__/comment_2_04e1da4352ef9f9be90253ea726e5f24._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="209.250.56.244"
+ subject="comment 2"
+ date="2014-04-02T19:41:29Z"
+ content="""
+What version of git-annex?
+
+Do you have ssh-askpass installed?
+
+You might try running git webapp from a terminal, in case ssh is unable to prompt for the password in a window using ssh-askpass.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/unrelated_repositories_sync/comment_1_c899b7b05a96d14e25c2efadff3b4e52._comment b/doc/forum/unrelated_repositories_sync/comment_1_c899b7b05a96d14e25c2efadff3b4e52._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7df8a0eb9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/unrelated_repositories_sync/comment_1_c899b7b05a96d14e25c2efadff3b4e52._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="209.250.56.244"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2014-04-02T19:51:06Z"
+ content="""
+It might help if you think about these two different repositories as branches. You have 2 branches with different files in them, and you want to produce a third branch with some mix of the two.
+
+I think git is perfectly capable of doing that. Where it gets hairy is dealing with merges when either of the 2 repositories change going forward. The same as if you've forked and modified source code, you will need to do *something* to resolve merges.
+"""]]