Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git-annex.branchable.com

5 files changed, 57 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_considers_remote_branches_which_makes_it_inconsistent/comment_2_5e1ad57420efd16ae09c9e5cad55b5f2._comment b/doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_considers_remote_branches_which_makes_it_inconsistent/comment_2_5e1ad57420efd16ae09c9e5cad55b5f2._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ffc0359a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/git_annex_unused_considers_remote_branches_which_makes_it_inconsistent/comment_2_5e1ad57420efd16ae09c9e5cad55b5f2._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="Steve"
+ ip="92.104.175.136"
+ subject="comment 2"
+ date="2013-01-01T23:51:53Z"
+ content="""
+I filed the bug because I thought the inconsistent behavior was bad.  For example;  If you move the data to a repo which doesn't know about the unsynced remote, it'll happily get dropped with dropunused as opposed to being considered in use in the current repo.
+
+There probably aren't too many people who want to have remotes set that are usually unreachable, and I can work around it now that I know it exists.
+
+If it is expected behavior, feel free to close the bug.
+
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/Calculating_Annex_Cost_by_Ping_Times/comment_1_9b4a6bc8d52ecbbdd537e8cf76757a80._comment b/doc/forum/Calculating_Annex_Cost_by_Ping_Times/comment_1_9b4a6bc8d52ecbbdd537e8cf76757a80._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2a2554f8d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Calculating_Annex_Cost_by_Ping_Times/comment_1_9b4a6bc8d52ecbbdd537e8cf76757a80._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
+ nickname="Richard"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2012-12-30T23:01:39Z"
+ content="""
+You may want to use hop count, not ping times, for a rough guesstimate of distance.
+
+Generally speaking, this is a highly non-trivial problem that's subject to university research projects so unless you find a well-maintained third party tool to solve this problem, it's unlikely that you will find a truly general solution.
+
+Anyway, look into mtr for your distance measurements.
+
+
+Richard
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/gadu_-_git-annex_disk_usage/comment_7_03a4dfaf3bd73d41c6f3c3fab0a6a922._comment b/doc/forum/gadu_-_git-annex_disk_usage/comment_7_03a4dfaf3bd73d41c6f3c3fab0a6a922._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..05f20ddcc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/gadu_-_git-annex_disk_usage/comment_7_03a4dfaf3bd73d41c6f3c3fab0a6a922._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="https://me.yahoo.com/a/2grhJvAC049fJnvALDXek.6MRZMTlg--#eec89"
+ nickname="John"
+ subject="sizes has git-annex support"
+ date="2012-12-30T22:47:42Z"
+ content="""
+Just to note that I already added git-annex support to my \"sizes\" utility on Hackage several months back.  With -A, it shows you storage totals with annex symlinks computed fully resolved.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/gadu_-_git-annex_disk_usage/comment_8_fc6ddb4dc075ee42368863c1b026dbf7._comment b/doc/forum/gadu_-_git-annex_disk_usage/comment_8_fc6ddb4dc075ee42368863c1b026dbf7._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..642ad3d96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/gadu_-_git-annex_disk_usage/comment_8_fc6ddb4dc075ee42368863c1b026dbf7._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="Steve"
+ ip="92.104.175.136"
+ subject="git repo is now up"
+ date="2013-01-01T23:39:33Z"
+ content="""
+sunny256, the git repo is now accessible at <http://git.mysteryvortex.com>
+
+Markus, never used the -m option myself.  I added it in git it'll be in the next tarball.  (I plan to go through the du man page and add all appropriate options soon)
+
+John, I wasn't aware of your sizes utility.  I'll look into it.
+
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/multiple_urls_for_the_same_UUID/comment_1_de7410d8824a864c4d106c9f1afaec3f._comment b/doc/forum/multiple_urls_for_the_same_UUID/comment_1_de7410d8824a864c4d106c9f1afaec3f._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c06cf01c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/multiple_urls_for_the_same_UUID/comment_1_de7410d8824a864c4d106c9f1afaec3f._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joeyh.name/"
+ ip="4.152.246.6"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2012-12-30T04:19:48Z"
+ content="""
+Yes, this is absolutely supported. If it's trying to `get` a file and it fails to access the first remote, it'll even automatically fall back to using the second. I do similar things with my own remote, for example I have a foo that uses ssh with a foo-local that uses NFS.
+"""]]