Comment moderation

2 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/doc/bugs/git_annex_fsck_is_a_no-op_in_bare_repos/comment_2_273a45e6977d40d39e0d9ab924a83240._comment b/doc/bugs/git_annex_fsck_is_a_no-op_in_bare_repos/comment_2_273a45e6977d40d39e0d9ab924a83240._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b01590a7a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/bugs/git_annex_fsck_is_a_no-op_in_bare_repos/comment_2_273a45e6977d40d39e0d9ab924a83240._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://ertai.myopenid.com/"
+ nickname="npouillard"
+ subject="git annex fsck --from remote"
+ date="2011-06-25T16:20:44Z"
+ content="""
+Currently fsck silently ignores --to/--from.
+It should at least complain if it is not supported.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/Wishlist:_Ways_of_selecting_files_based_on_meta-information/comment_1_818f38aa988177d3a9415055e084f0fb._comment b/doc/forum/Wishlist:_Ways_of_selecting_files_based_on_meta-information/comment_1_818f38aa988177d3a9415055e084f0fb._comment
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..11b44b809
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Wishlist:_Ways_of_selecting_files_based_on_meta-information/comment_1_818f38aa988177d3a9415055e084f0fb._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://christian.amsuess.com/chrysn"
+ nickname="chrysn"
+ subject="filtering based on git-commits"
+ date="2011-06-23T13:56:35Z"
+ content="""
+additional filter criteria could come from the git history:
+
+* `git annex get --touched-in HEAD~5..` to fetch what has recently been worked on
+* `git annex get --touched-by chrysn --touched-in version-1.0..HEAD` to fetch what i've been workin on recently (based on regexp or substring match in author; git experts could probably craft much more meaningful expressions)
+
+these options could also apply to `git annex find` -- actually, looking at the normal file system tools for such tasks, that might even be sufficient (think `git annex find --numcopies-gt 3 --present-on lanserver1 --drop` like `find -iname '*foo*' -delete`
+
+(i was about to open a new forum discussion for commit-based getting, but this is close enough to be usefully joint in a discussion)
+"""]]