summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>2011-10-29 12:45:47 -0400
committerGravatar Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>2011-10-29 12:45:47 -0400
commit4d7802bff71d62ceb674eee6c957c74a1e85a2eb (patch)
treefab54e7ace396025c0cf7893564f928d40185e30
parent0dcbe51ed2e966376f506b1f780c37632bd81860 (diff)
responsen
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/git_annex_upgrade_output_is_inconsistent_and_spammy.mdwn7
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/uninit_does_not_work_in_old_repos.mdwn9
2 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/git_annex_upgrade_output_is_inconsistent_and_spammy.mdwn b/doc/bugs/git_annex_upgrade_output_is_inconsistent_and_spammy.mdwn
index 89701144a..3d75483dc 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/git_annex_upgrade_output_is_inconsistent_and_spammy.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/git_annex_upgrade_output_is_inconsistent_and_spammy.mdwn
@@ -6,3 +6,10 @@ Upgrading from v1 to v3:
ok
A whirly would be preferable, imo.
+
+> Erm, I'm pretty sure you were the one who asked for there to be some
+> progress dots, Richard.
+>
+> I'm not particularly interested in implementing a whirley that would only
+> be used in this one place, in code that very few users are going to run
+> again. I could remove the dots.. --[[Joey]]
diff --git a/doc/bugs/uninit_does_not_work_in_old_repos.mdwn b/doc/bugs/uninit_does_not_work_in_old_repos.mdwn
index a6f785863..1e1b1fec7 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/uninit_does_not_work_in_old_repos.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/uninit_does_not_work_in_old_repos.mdwn
@@ -4,3 +4,12 @@ As uninit does not need to actually write out any data, just remove it, it shoul
git-annex: Repository version 2 is not supported. Upgrade this repository: git-annex upgrade
If the repo happens to be broken, this essentially locks in data.
+
+> No, because you can always check out the version of git-annex you need
+> for that repository.
+>
+> uninit, as implemented, runs unannex on every file and then does some
+> cleanup. The cleanup does not need to write state, but the unannex does.
+> And it depends on the object directory layout, which has changed between
+> versions. So supporting old versions in this code would complicate it
+> quite a lot. I don't want to go there. --[[Joey]]