aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/Compilers/Named/CompileInterp.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/Compilers/Named/CompileInterp.v')
-rw-r--r--src/Compilers/Named/CompileInterp.v196
1 files changed, 196 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/Compilers/Named/CompileInterp.v b/src/Compilers/Named/CompileInterp.v
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1c7e42258
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/Compilers/Named/CompileInterp.v
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+(** * PHOAS → Named Representation of Gallina *)
+Require Import Crypto.Compilers.Named.Syntax.
+Require Import Crypto.Compilers.Named.NameUtil.
+Require Import Crypto.Compilers.Named.NameUtilProperties.
+Require Import Crypto.Compilers.Named.ContextDefinitions.
+Require Import Crypto.Compilers.Named.ContextProperties.
+Require Import Crypto.Compilers.Named.ContextProperties.NameUtil.
+Require Import Crypto.Compilers.Syntax.
+Require Import Crypto.Compilers.Wf.
+Require Import Crypto.Compilers.Named.Compile.
+Require Import Crypto.Util.PointedProp.
+Require Import Crypto.Util.Option.
+Require Import Crypto.Util.Decidable.
+Require Import Crypto.Util.Prod.
+Require Import Crypto.Util.ListUtil.
+Require Import Crypto.Util.Tactics.BreakMatch.
+Require Import Crypto.Util.Tactics.DestructHead.
+Require Import Crypto.Util.Tactics.SpecializeBy.
+
+Local Open Scope ctype_scope.
+Local Open Scope nexpr_scope.
+Local Open Scope expr_scope.
+Section language.
+ Context {base_type_code}
+ {op : flat_type base_type_code -> flat_type base_type_code -> Type}
+ {Name : Type}
+ {interp_base_type : base_type_code -> Type}
+ {interp_op : forall src dst, op src dst -> interp_flat_type interp_base_type src -> interp_flat_type interp_base_type dst}
+ {base_type_dec : DecidableRel (@eq base_type_code)}
+ {Name_dec : DecidableRel (@eq Name)}
+ {Context : @Context base_type_code Name interp_base_type}
+ {ContextOk : ContextOk Context}.
+
+ Local Notation flat_type := (flat_type base_type_code).
+ Local Notation type := (type base_type_code).
+ Local Notation exprf := (@exprf base_type_code op (fun _ => Name)).
+ Local Notation expr := (@expr base_type_code op (fun _ => Name)).
+ Local Notation wff := (@wff base_type_code op (fun _ => Name) interp_base_type).
+ Local Notation wf := (@wf base_type_code op (fun _ => Name) interp_base_type).
+ Local Notation nexprf := (@Named.exprf base_type_code op Name).
+ Local Notation nexpr := (@Named.expr base_type_code op Name).
+ Local Notation ocompilef := (@ocompilef base_type_code op Name).
+ Local Notation ocompile := (@ocompile base_type_code op Name).
+ Local Notation compilef := (@compilef base_type_code op Name).
+ Local Notation compile := (@compile base_type_code op Name).
+
+ Lemma interpf_ocompilef (ctx : Context) {t} (e : exprf t) e' (ls : list (option Name))
+ G
+ (Hwf : wff G e e')
+ (HG : forall t n x, List.In (existT _ t (n, x)%core) G -> lookupb ctx n t = Some x)
+ v
+ (H : ocompilef e ls = Some v)
+ (Hls : oname_list_unique ls)
+ (HGls : forall t n x, List.In (existT _ t (n, x)%core) G -> List.In (Some n) ls -> False)
+ : Named.interpf (interp_op:=interp_op) (ctx:=ctx) v
+ = Some (interpf interp_op e').
+ Proof using ContextOk Name_dec base_type_dec.
+ revert dependent ctx; revert dependent ls; induction Hwf;
+ repeat first [ progress intros
+ | progress subst
+ | progress inversion_option
+ | apply (f_equal (@Some _))
+ | apply (f_equal (@interp_op _ _ _))
+ | solve [ eauto ]
+ | progress simpl in *
+ | progress unfold option_map, LetIn.Let_In in *
+ | progress break_innermost_match_step
+ | progress break_match_hyps
+ | progress destruct_head' or
+ | progress inversion_prod
+ | progress specialize_by_assumption
+ | progress specialize_by auto using oname_list_unique_nil
+ | match goal with
+ | [ H : forall x, oname_list_unique ?ls -> _ |- _ ]
+ => specialize (fun pf x => H x pf)
+ | [ H : context[snd (split_onames _ _)] |- _ ]
+ => rewrite snd_split_onames_skipn in H
+ | [ H : oname_list_unique (List.skipn _ _) -> _ |- _ ]
+ => specialize (fun pf => H (@oname_list_unique_skipn _ _ _ pf))
+ | [ IH : forall v ls, ocompilef ?e ls = Some v -> _, H : ocompilef ?e ?ls' = Some ?v' |- _ ]
+ => specialize (IH _ _ H)
+ | [ IH : forall x1 x2 v ls, ocompilef (?e x1) ls = Some v -> _, H : ocompilef (?e ?x1') ?ls' = Some ?v' |- _ ]
+ => specialize (fun x2 => IH _ x2 _ _ H)
+ | [ H : context[List.In _ (_ ++ _)] |- _ ]
+ => rewrite List.in_app_iff in H
+ | [ H : forall ctx, _ -> Named.interpf ?e = Some _, H' : context[Named.interpf ?e] |- _ ]
+ => rewrite H in H' by assumption
+ | [ H : forall x2 ctx, _ -> Named.interpf ?e = Some _ |- Named.interpf ?e = Some _ ]
+ => apply H; clear H
+ | [ H : forall x2, _ -> forall ctx, _ -> Named.interpf ?e = Some _ |- Named.interpf ?e = Some _ ]
+ => apply H; clear H
+ end ];
+ repeat match goal with
+ | _ => erewrite lookupb_extend by assumption
+ | [ |- context[find_Name_and_val ?tdec ?ndec ?a ?b ?c ?d ?default] ]
+ => lazymatch default with None => fail | _ => idtac end;
+ rewrite (find_Name_and_val_split tdec ndec (default:=default))
+ | [ H : _ |- _ ] => erewrite H by eassumption
+ | _ => progress unfold dec in *
+ | _ => progress break_innermost_match_step
+ | _ => progress subst
+ | _ => progress destruct_head' and
+ | _ => congruence
+ | [ H : List.In _ (flatten_binding_list _ _) |- _ ]
+ => erewrite <- (flatten_binding_list_find_Name_and_val_unique _ _) in H;
+ [ | | apply path_prod_uncurried; split; [ eassumption | simpl; reflexivity ] ];
+ [ | solve [ eauto using oname_list_unique_firstn, oname_list_unique_skipn ] ]
+ | [ H : _ |- _ ]
+ => first [ erewrite find_Name_and_val_wrong_type in H by eassumption
+ | rewrite find_Name_and_val_different in H by assumption
+ | rewrite snd_split_onames_skipn in H ]
+ | _ => solve [ eauto using In_skipn, In_firstn
+ | eapply split_onames_find_Name_Some_unique; [ | apply path_prod; simpl | ]; eauto ]
+ | [ H : find_Name_and_val _ _ ?t ?n ?N ?V None = Some _, H' : List.In (Some ?n) (List.skipn _ ?ls) |- False ]
+ => eapply find_Name_and_val_find_Name_Some, split_onames_find_Name_Some_unique in H;
+ [ | | apply path_prod_uncurried; split; [ eassumption | simpl; reflexivity ] ];
+ [ | solve [ eauto using oname_list_unique_firstn, oname_list_unique_skipn ] ]
+ | [ H : List.In (existT _ ?t (?n, _)%core) ?G,
+ H' : List.In (Some ?n) (List.skipn _ ?ls),
+ IH : forall t' n' x', List.In (existT _ t' (n', x')%core) ?G -> List.In (Some n') ?ls -> False
+ |- False ]
+ => apply (IH _ _ _ H); clear IH H
+ | [ H : List.In (existT _ ?t (?n, _)%core) ?G,
+ H' : find_Name _ ?n ?N = Some ?t',
+ IH : forall t' n' x', List.In (existT _ t' (n', x')%core) ?G -> List.In (Some n') ?ls -> False
+ |- _ ]
+ => exfalso; apply (IH _ _ _ H); clear IH H
+ end.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma interp_ocompile (ctx : Context) {t} (e : expr t) e' (ls : list (option Name))
+ (Hwf : wf e e')
+ f
+ (Hls : oname_list_unique ls)
+ (H : ocompile e ls = Some f)
+ : forall v, Named.interp (interp_op:=interp_op) (ctx:=ctx) f v
+ = Some (interp interp_op e' v).
+ Proof using ContextOk Name_dec base_type_dec.
+ revert H; destruct Hwf;
+ repeat first [ progress simpl in *
+ | progress unfold option_map, Named.interp in *
+ | congruence
+ | progress break_innermost_match
+ | progress inversion_option
+ | progress subst
+ | progress intros ].
+ eapply interpf_ocompilef;
+ [ eauto | | eassumption
+ | inversion_prod; subst; rewrite snd_split_onames_skipn; eauto using oname_list_unique_skipn
+ |intros ???; erewrite <- (flatten_binding_list_find_Name_and_val_unique _ _) by eassumption;
+ let H := fresh in
+ intro H; apply find_Name_and_val_find_Name_Some in H;
+ eapply split_onames_find_Name_Some_unique in H; [ | eassumption.. ];
+ intuition ].
+ { intros ???.
+ repeat first [ solve [ auto ]
+ | rewrite (lookupb_extend Context _ _ _)
+ | progress subst
+ | progress break_innermost_match
+ | erewrite <- (flatten_binding_list_find_Name_and_val_unique _ _) by eassumption
+ | congruence
+ | match goal with
+ | [ |- context[find_Name_and_val ?tdec ?ndec ?a ?b ?c ?d ?default] ]
+ => lazymatch default with None => fail | _ => idtac end;
+ rewrite (find_Name_and_val_split tdec ndec (default:=default))
+ | [ H : _ |- _ ] => first [ erewrite find_Name_and_val_wrong_type in H by eassumption
+ | erewrite find_Name_and_val_different in H by eassumption ]
+ end
+ | progress intros ]. }
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma interpf_compilef (ctx : Context) {t} (e : exprf t) e' (ls : list Name)
+ G
+ (Hwf : wff G e e')
+ (HG : forall t n x, List.In (existT _ t (n, x)%core) G -> lookupb ctx n t = Some x)
+ v
+ (H : compilef e ls = Some v)
+ (Hls : name_list_unique ls)
+ (HGls : forall t n x, List.In (existT _ t (n, x)%core) G -> List.In n ls -> False)
+ : Named.interpf (interp_op:=interp_op) (ctx:=ctx) v
+ = Some (interpf interp_op e').
+ Proof using ContextOk Name_dec base_type_dec.
+ eapply interpf_ocompilef; try eassumption.
+ setoid_rewrite List.in_map_iff; intros; destruct_head' ex; destruct_head' and; inversion_option; subst.
+ eauto.
+ Qed.
+
+ Lemma interp_compile (ctx : Context) {t} (e : expr t) e' (ls : list Name)
+ (Hwf : wf e e')
+ f
+ (Hls : name_list_unique ls)
+ (H : compile e ls = Some f)
+ : forall v, Named.interp (interp_op:=interp_op) (ctx:=ctx) f v
+ = Some (interp interp_op e' v).
+ Proof using ContextOk Name_dec base_type_dec. eapply interp_ocompile; eassumption. Qed.
+End language.