diff options
author | 2016-09-18 11:20:05 -0400 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2016-09-18 11:32:08 -0400 | |
commit | 138b77db59ac11eb59fd63a28181dbc83445d173 (patch) | |
tree | 54acf3d0272defe62067d5116a25170da28eab27 | |
parent | 361a3a4b2d7b171fb0cd510beeb8e039088c2517 (diff) |
Fix the 8.4 build by changing a couple standard library names
-rw-r--r-- | src/ModularArithmetic/ModularBaseSystemProofs.v | 20 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/src/ModularArithmetic/ModularBaseSystemProofs.v b/src/ModularArithmetic/ModularBaseSystemProofs.v index a551adc2f..2deeba0fa 100644 --- a/src/ModularArithmetic/ModularBaseSystemProofs.v +++ b/src/ModularArithmetic/ModularBaseSystemProofs.v @@ -802,9 +802,9 @@ Section CanonicalizationProofs. (forall n : nat, 0 <= to_list (length limb_widths) u [n] < 2 ^ B - - (if PeanoNat.Nat.eq_dec n 0 + (if eq_nat_dec n 0 then 0 - else (2 ^ B) >> (limb_widths [Init.Nat.pred n]))). + else (2 ^ B) >> (limb_widths [pred n]))). Local Notation minimal_rep u := ((bounded limb_widths (to_list (length limb_widths) u)) /\ (ge_modulus (to_list _ u) = false)). @@ -934,9 +934,9 @@ Section SquareRootProofs. Definition freeze_input_bounds n := (2 ^ B - - (if PeanoNat.Nat.eq_dec n 0 + (if eq_nat_dec n 0 then 0 - else (2 ^ B) >> (nth_default 0 limb_widths (Init.Nat.pred n)))). + else (2 ^ B) >> (nth_default 0 limb_widths (pred n)))). Definition bounded_by u bounds := (forall n : nat, 0 <= nth_default 0 (to_list (length limb_widths) u) n < bounds n). @@ -956,7 +956,8 @@ Section SquareRootProofs. Proof. intros. case_eq (eqb u v). - + rewrite <-eqb_true_iff by eassumption; intros; split; congruence. + + rewrite <-eqb_true_iff by eassumption; split; intros; + congruence || contradiction. + split; intros; auto. intro Hfalse_eq; rewrite (eqb_true_iff u v) in Hfalse_eq by eassumption. @@ -1011,13 +1012,14 @@ Section SquareRootProofs. rewrite <-chain_correct; apply pow_rep; eassumption | |- _ => rewrite <-chain_correct; apply pow_rep; eassumption | H : eqb ?a ?b = true |- _ => - rewrite <-(eqb_true_iff a b) in Heqb + rewrite <-(eqb_true_iff a b) in H by (eassumption || rewrite <-mul_equiv, <-pow_equiv; - apply mul_bounded, pow_bounded; auto); congruence + apply mul_bounded, pow_bounded; auto) | H : eqb ?a ?b = false |- _ => - rewrite <-(eqb_false_iff a b) in Heqb + rewrite <-(eqb_false_iff a b) in H by (eassumption || rewrite <-mul_equiv, <-pow_equiv; - apply mul_bounded, pow_bounded; auto); congruence + apply mul_bounded, pow_bounded; auto) + | |- _ => congruence end. Qed. End Sqrt5mod8. |