1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
|
namespace Eigen {
/** \page StructHavingEigenMembers Structures Having Eigen Members
\b Table \b of \b contents
- \ref summary
- \ref what
- \ref how
- \ref why
- \ref movetotop
- \ref bugineigen
- \ref conditional
\section summary Executive Summary
If you define a structure having members of \ref FixedSizeVectorizable "fixed-size vectorizable Eigen types", you must overload its "operator new" so that it generates 16-bytes-aligned pointers. Fortunately, Eigen provides you with a macro EIGEN_MAKE_ALIGNED_OPERATOR_NEW that does that for you.
\section what What kind of code needs to be changed?
The kind of code that needs to be changed is this:
\code
class Foo
{
...
Eigen::Vector2d v;
...
};
...
Foo *foo = new Foo;
\endcode
In other words: you have a class that has as a member a \ref FixedSizeVectorizable "fixed-size vectorizable Eigen object", and then you dynamically create an object of that class.
\section how How should such code be modified?
Very easy, you just need to put a EIGEN_MAKE_ALIGNED_OPERATOR_NEW macro in a public part of your class, like this:
\code
class Foo
{
...
Eigen::Vector2d v;
...
public:
EIGEN_MAKE_ALIGNED_OPERATOR_NEW
};
...
Foo *foo = new Foo;
\endcode
This macro makes "new Foo" always return an aligned pointer.
\section why Why is this needed?
OK let's say that your code looks like this:
\code
class Foo
{
...
Eigen::Vector2d v;
...
};
...
Foo *foo = new Foo;
\endcode
A Eigen::Vector2d consists of 2 doubles, which is 128 bits. Which is exactly the size of a SSE packet, which makes it possible to use SSE for all sorts of operations on this vector. But SSE instructions (at least the ones that Eigen uses, which are the fast ones) require 128-bit alignment. Otherwise you get a segmentation fault.
For this reason, Eigen takes care by itself to require 128-bit alignment for Eigen::Vector2d, by doing two things:
\li Eigen requires 128-bit alignment for the Eigen::Vector2d's array (of 2 doubles). With GCC, this is done with a __attribute__ ((aligned(16))).
\li Eigen overloads the "operator new" of Eigen::Vector2d so it will always return 128-bit aligned pointers.
Thus, normally, you don't have to worry about anything, Eigen handles alignment for you...
... except in one case. When you have a class Foo like above, and you dynamically allocate a new Foo as above, then, since Foo doesn't have aligned "operator new", the returned pointer foo is not necessarily 128-bit aligned.
The alignment attribute of the member v is then relative to the start of the class, foo. If the foo pointer wasn't aligned, then foo->v won't be aligned either!
The solution is to let class Foo have an aligned "operator new", as we showed in the previous section.
\section movetotop Should I then put all the members of Eigen types at the beginning of my class?
No, that's not needed. Since Eigen takes care of declaring 128-bit alignment, all members that need it are automatically 128-bit aligned relatively to the class. So when you have code like
\code
class Foo
{
double x;
Eigen::Vector2d v;
public:
EIGEN_MAKE_ALIGNED_OPERATOR_NEW
};
\endcode
it will work just fine. You do \b not need to rewrite it as
\code
class Foo
{
Eigen::Vector2d v;
double x;
public:
EIGEN_MAKE_ALIGNED_OPERATOR_NEW
};
\endcode
\section dynamicsize What about dynamic-size matrices and vectors?
Dynamic-size matrices and vectors, such as Eigen::VectorXd, allocate dynamically their own array of coefficients, so they take care of requiring absolute alignment automatically. So they don't cause this issue. The issue discussed here is only with fixed-size matrices and vectors.
\section bugineigen So is this a bug in Eigen?
No, it's not our bug. It's more like an inherent problem of the C++ language -- though it must be said that any other existing language probably has the same problem. The problem is that there is no way that you can specify an aligned "operator new" that would propagate to classes having you as member data.
\section conditional What if I want to do this conditionnally (depending on template parameters) ?
For this situation, we offer the macro EIGEN_MAKE_ALIGNED_OPERATOR_NEW_IF(NeedsToAlign). It will generate aligned operators like EIGEN_MAKE_ALIGNED_OPERATOR_NEW if NeedsToAlign is true. It will generate operators with the default alignment if NeedsToAlign is false.
Example:
\code
template<int n> class Foo
{
typedef Eigen::Matrix<float,n,1> Vector;
enum { NeedsToAlign = (sizeof(Vector)%16)==0 };
...
Vector v;
...
public:
EIGEN_MAKE_ALIGNED_OPERATOR_NEW_IF(NeedsToAlign)
};
...
Foo<4> *foo4 = new Foo<4>; // foo4 is guaranteed to be 128bit-aligned
Foo<3> *foo3 = new Foo<3>; // foo3 has only the system default alignment guarantee
\endcode
*/
}
|
