aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--Eigen/src/Core/products/GeneralBlockPanelKernel.h88
1 files changed, 85 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Eigen/src/Core/products/GeneralBlockPanelKernel.h b/Eigen/src/Core/products/GeneralBlockPanelKernel.h
index eb095966b..65310e637 100644
--- a/Eigen/src/Core/products/GeneralBlockPanelKernel.h
+++ b/Eigen/src/Core/products/GeneralBlockPanelKernel.h
@@ -155,9 +155,91 @@ void computeProductBlockingSizes(Index& k, Index& m, Index& n, Index num_threads
// In unit tests we do not want to use extra large matrices,
// so we reduce the block size to check the blocking strategy is not flawed
#ifndef EIGEN_DEBUG_SMALL_PRODUCT_BLOCKS
- k = std::min<Index>(k,sizeof(LhsScalar)<=4 ? 360 : 240);
- n = std::min<Index>(n,3840/sizeof(RhsScalar));
- m = std::min<Index>(m,3840/sizeof(RhsScalar));
+ // Early return for small problems because the computation below are time consuming for small problems.
+ // Perhaps it would make more sense to consider k*n*m??
+ // Note that for very tiny problem, this function should be bypassed anyway
+ // because we use the coefficient-based implementation for them.
+ if(std::max(k,std::max(m,n))<48)
+ return;
+
+ typedef typename Traits::ResScalar ResScalar;
+ enum {
+ k_peeling = 8,
+ k_div = KcFactor * (Traits::mr * sizeof(LhsScalar) + Traits::nr * sizeof(RhsScalar)),
+ k_sub = Traits::mr * Traits::nr * sizeof(ResScalar)
+ };
+
+ // ---- 1st level of blocking on L1, yields kc ----
+
+ // Blocking on the third dimension (i.e., k) is chosen so that an horizontal panel
+ // of size mr x kc of the lhs plus a vertical panel of kc x nr of the rhs both fits within L1 cache.
+ // We also include a register-level block of the result (mx x nr).
+ // (In an ideal world only the lhs panel would stay in L1)
+ // Moreover, kc has to be a multiple of 8 to be compatible with loop peeling, leading to a maximum blocking size of:
+ const Index max_kc = ((l1-k_sub)/k_div) & (~(k_peeling-1));
+ const Index old_k = k;
+ if(k>max_kc)
+ {
+ // We are really blocking on the third dimension:
+ // -> reduce blocking size to make sure the last block is as large as possible
+ // while keeping the same number of sweeps over the result.
+ k = (k%max_kc)==0 ? max_kc
+ : max_kc - k_peeling * ((max_kc-1-(k%max_kc))/(k_peeling*(k/max_kc+1)));
+
+ eigen_internal_assert(((old_k/k) == (old_k/max_kc)) && "the number of sweeps has to remain the same");
+ }
+
+ // ---- 2nd level of blocking on max(L2,L3), yields nc ----
+
+ // TODO find a reliable way to get the actual amount of cache per core to use for 2nd level blocking, that is:
+ // actual_l2 = max(l2, l3/nb_core_sharing_l3)
+ // The number below is quite conservative: it is better to underestimate the cache size rather than overestimating it)
+ // For instance, it corresponds to 6MB of L3 shared among 4 cores.
+ const Index actual_l2 = 1572864; // == 1.5 MB
+
+ // Here, nc is chosen such that a block of kc x nc of the rhs fit within half of L2.
+ // The second half is implicitly reserved to access the result and lhs coefficients.
+ // When k<max_kc, then nc can arbitrarily growth. In practice, it seems to be fruitful
+ // to limit this growth: we bound nc to growth by a factor x1.5, leading to:
+ const Index max_nc = (3*actual_l2)/(2*2*max_kc*sizeof(RhsScalar));
+ // WARNING Below, we assume that Traits::nr is a power of two.
+ Index nc = std::min<Index>(actual_l2/(2*k*sizeof(RhsScalar)), max_nc) & (~(Traits::nr-1));
+ if(n>nc)
+ {
+ // We are really blocking over the columns:
+ // -> reduce blocking size to make sure the last block is as large as possible
+ // while keeping the same number of sweeps over the packed lhs.
+ // Here we allow one more sweep if this gives us a perfect match, thus the commented "-1"
+ n = (n%nc)==0 ? nc
+ : (nc - Traits::nr * ((nc/*-1*/-(n%nc))/(Traits::nr*(n/nc+1))));
+ }
+ else if(old_k==k)
+ {
+ // So far, no blocking at all, i.e., kc==k, and nc==n.
+ // In this case, let's perform a blocking over the rows such that the packed lhs data is kept in cache L1/L2
+ Index problem_size = k*n*sizeof(LhsScalar);
+ Index actual_lm = actual_l2;
+ Index max_mc = m;
+ if(problem_size<=1024)
+ {
+ // problem is small enough to keep in L1
+ // Let's choose m such that lhs's block fit in 1/3 of L1
+ actual_lm = l1;
+ }
+ else if(l3!=0 && problem_size<=32768)
+ {
+ // we have both L2 and L3, and problem is small enough to be kept in L2
+ // Let's choose m such that lhs's block fit in 1/3 of L2
+ actual_lm = l2;
+ max_mc = 576;
+ }
+
+ Index mc = (std::min<Index>)(actual_lm/(3*k*sizeof(LhsScalar)), max_mc);
+ if (mc > Traits::mr) mc -= mc % Traits::mr;
+
+ m = (m%mc)==0 ? mc
+ : (mc - Traits::mr * ((mc/*-1*/-(m%mc))/(Traits::mr*(m/mc+1))));
+ }
#else
k = std::min<Index>(k,24);
n = std::min<Index>(n,384/sizeof(RhsScalar));