Fix triangularView versus triangularPart.

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/doc/TemplateKeyword.dox b/doc/TemplateKeyword.dox
index e06aba7ba..b84cfdae9 100644
--- a/doc/TemplateKeyword.dox
+++ b/doc/TemplateKeyword.dox
@@ -73,13 +73,13 @@ for operator<".
 The reason that the \c template keyword is necessary in the last example has to do with the rules for how
 templates are supposed to be compiled in C++. The compiler has to check the code for correct syntax at the
 point where the template is defined, without knowing the actual value of the template arguments (\c Derived1
-and \c Derived2 in the example). That means that the compiler cannot know that <tt>dst.triangularPart</tt> is
+and \c Derived2 in the example). That means that the compiler cannot know that <tt>dst.triangularView</tt> is
 a member template and that the following &lt; symbol is part of the delimiter for the template
-parameter. Another possibility would be that <tt>dst.triangularPart</tt> is a member variable with the &lt;
+parameter. Another possibility would be that <tt>dst.triangularView</tt> is a member variable with the &lt;
 symbol refering to the <tt>operator&lt;()</tt> function. In fact, the compiler should choose the second
-possibility, according to the standard. If <tt>dst.triangularPart</tt> is a member template (as in our case),
+possibility, according to the standard. If <tt>dst.triangularView</tt> is a member template (as in our case),
 the programmer should specify this explicitly with the \c template keyword and write <tt>dst.template
-triangularPart</tt>.
+triangularView</tt>.
 
 The precise rules are rather complicated, but ignoring some subtleties we can summarize them as follows:
 - A <em>dependent name</em> is name that depends (directly or indirectly) on a template parameter. In the