blob: 1bca3fbe877b2020d75286e71d8f3480a5c7ddda (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
|
(************************************************************************)
(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
(* <O___,, * CNRS-Ecole Polytechnique-INRIA Futurs-Universite Paris Sud *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
(*i $Id: Compare.v,v 1.1.2.1 2004/07/16 19:31:23 herbelin Exp $ i*)
(** Equality is decidable on [nat] *)
V7only [Import nat_scope.].
Open Local Scope nat_scope.
(*
Lemma not_eq_sym : (A:Set)(p,q:A)(~p=q) -> ~(q=p).
Proof sym_not_eq.
Hints Immediate not_eq_sym : arith.
*)
Notation not_eq_sym := sym_not_eq.
Implicit Variables Type m,n,p,q:nat.
Require Arith.
Require Peano_dec.
Require Compare_dec.
Definition le_or_le_S := le_le_S_dec.
Definition compare := gt_eq_gt_dec.
Lemma le_dec : (n,m:nat) {le n m} + {le m n}.
Proof le_ge_dec.
Definition lt_or_eq := [n,m:nat]{(gt m n)}+{n=m}.
Lemma le_decide : (n,m:nat)(le n m)->(lt_or_eq n m).
Proof le_lt_eq_dec.
Lemma le_le_S_eq : (p,q:nat)(le p q)->((le (S p) q)\/(p=q)).
Proof le_lt_or_eq.
(* By special request of G. Kahn - Used in Group Theory *)
Lemma discrete_nat : (m, n: nat) (lt m n) ->
(S m) = n \/ (EX r: nat | n = (S (S (plus m r)))).
Proof.
Intros m n H.
LApply (lt_le_S m n); Auto with arith.
Intro H'; LApply (le_lt_or_eq (S m) n); Auto with arith.
NewInduction 1; Auto with arith.
Right; Exists (minus n (S (S m))); Simpl.
Rewrite (plus_sym m (minus n (S (S m)))).
Rewrite (plus_n_Sm (minus n (S (S m))) m).
Rewrite (plus_n_Sm (minus n (S (S m))) (S m)).
Rewrite (plus_sym (minus n (S (S m))) (S (S m))); Auto with arith.
Qed.
Require Export Wf_nat.
Require Export Min.
|
