1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
|
(************************************************************************)
(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
(* <O___,, * INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2016 *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
(* Evgeny Makarov, INRIA, 2007 *)
(************************************************************************)
(** This file defined the strong (course-of-value, well-founded) recursion
and proves its properties *)
Require Export NSub.
Ltac f_equiv' := repeat (repeat f_equiv; try intros ? ? ?; auto).
Module NStrongRecProp (Import N : NAxiomsRecSig').
Include NSubProp N.
Section StrongRecursion.
Variable A : Type.
Variable Aeq : relation A.
Variable Aeq_equiv : Equivalence Aeq.
(** [strong_rec] allows defining a recursive function [phi] given by
an equation [phi(n) = F(phi)(n)] where recursive calls to [phi]
in [F] are made on strictly lower numbers than [n].
For [strong_rec a F n]:
- Parameter [a:A] is a default value used internally, it has no
effect on the final result.
- Parameter [F:(N->A)->N->A] is the step function:
[F f n] should return [phi(n)] when [f] is a function
that coincide with [phi] for numbers strictly less than [n].
*)
Definition strong_rec (a : A) (f : (N.t -> A) -> N.t -> A) (n : N.t) : A :=
recursion (fun _ => a) (fun _ => f) (S n) n.
(** For convenience, we use in proofs an intermediate definition
between [recursion] and [strong_rec]. *)
Definition strong_rec0 (a : A) (f : (N.t -> A) -> N.t -> A) : N.t -> N.t -> A :=
recursion (fun _ => a) (fun _ => f).
Lemma strong_rec_alt : forall a f n,
strong_rec a f n = strong_rec0 a f (S n) n.
Proof.
reflexivity.
Qed.
Instance strong_rec0_wd :
Proper (Aeq ==> ((N.eq ==> Aeq) ==> N.eq ==> Aeq) ==> N.eq ==> N.eq ==> Aeq)
strong_rec0.
Proof.
unfold strong_rec0; f_equiv'.
Qed.
Instance strong_rec_wd :
Proper (Aeq ==> ((N.eq ==> Aeq) ==> N.eq ==> Aeq) ==> N.eq ==> Aeq) strong_rec.
Proof.
intros a a' Eaa' f f' Eff' n n' Enn'.
rewrite !strong_rec_alt; f_equiv'.
Qed.
Section FixPoint.
Variable f : (N.t -> A) -> N.t -> A.
Variable f_wd : Proper ((N.eq==>Aeq)==>N.eq==>Aeq) f.
Lemma strong_rec0_0 : forall a m,
(strong_rec0 a f 0 m) = a.
Proof.
intros. unfold strong_rec0. rewrite recursion_0; auto.
Qed.
Lemma strong_rec0_succ : forall a n m,
Aeq (strong_rec0 a f (S n) m) (f (strong_rec0 a f n) m).
Proof.
intros. unfold strong_rec0.
f_equiv.
rewrite recursion_succ; f_equiv'.
Qed.
Lemma strong_rec_0 : forall a,
Aeq (strong_rec a f 0) (f (fun _ => a) 0).
Proof.
intros. rewrite strong_rec_alt, strong_rec0_succ; f_equiv'.
rewrite strong_rec0_0. reflexivity.
Qed.
(* We need an assumption saying that for every n, the step function (f h n)
calls h only on the segment [0 ... n - 1]. This means that if h1 and h2
coincide on values < n, then (f h1 n) coincides with (f h2 n) *)
Hypothesis step_good :
forall (n : N.t) (h1 h2 : N.t -> A),
(forall m : N.t, m < n -> Aeq (h1 m) (h2 m)) -> Aeq (f h1 n) (f h2 n).
Lemma strong_rec0_more_steps : forall a k n m, m < n ->
Aeq (strong_rec0 a f n m) (strong_rec0 a f (n+k) m).
Proof.
intros a k n. pattern n.
apply induction; clear n.
intros n n' Hn; setoid_rewrite Hn; auto with *.
intros m Hm. destruct (nlt_0_r _ Hm).
intros n IH m Hm.
rewrite lt_succ_r in Hm.
rewrite add_succ_l.
rewrite 2 strong_rec0_succ.
apply step_good.
intros m' Hm'.
apply IH.
apply lt_le_trans with m; auto.
Qed.
Lemma strong_rec0_fixpoint : forall (a : A) (n : N.t),
Aeq (strong_rec0 a f (S n) n) (f (fun n => strong_rec0 a f (S n) n) n).
Proof.
intros.
rewrite strong_rec0_succ.
apply step_good.
intros m Hm.
symmetry.
setoid_replace n with (S m + (n - S m)).
apply strong_rec0_more_steps.
apply lt_succ_diag_r.
rewrite add_comm.
symmetry.
apply sub_add.
rewrite le_succ_l; auto.
Qed.
Theorem strong_rec_fixpoint : forall (a : A) (n : N.t),
Aeq (strong_rec a f n) (f (strong_rec a f) n).
Proof.
intros.
transitivity (f (fun n => strong_rec0 a f (S n) n) n).
rewrite strong_rec_alt.
apply strong_rec0_fixpoint.
f_equiv.
intros x x' Hx; rewrite strong_rec_alt, Hx; auto with *.
Qed.
(** NB: without the [step_good] hypothesis, we have proved that
[strong_rec a f 0] is [f (fun _ => a) 0]. Now we can prove
that the first argument of [f] is arbitrary in this case...
*)
Theorem strong_rec_0_any : forall (a : A)(any : N.t->A),
Aeq (strong_rec a f 0) (f any 0).
Proof.
intros.
rewrite strong_rec_fixpoint.
apply step_good.
intros m Hm. destruct (nlt_0_r _ Hm).
Qed.
(** ... and that first argument of [strong_rec] is always arbitrary. *)
Lemma strong_rec_any_fst_arg : forall a a' n,
Aeq (strong_rec a f n) (strong_rec a' f n).
Proof.
intros a a' n.
generalize (le_refl n).
set (k:=n) at -2. clearbody k. revert k. pattern n.
apply induction; clear n.
(* compat *)
intros n n' Hn. setoid_rewrite Hn; auto with *.
(* 0 *)
intros k Hk. rewrite le_0_r in Hk.
rewrite Hk, strong_rec_0. symmetry. apply strong_rec_0_any.
(* S *)
intros n IH k Hk.
rewrite 2 strong_rec_fixpoint.
apply step_good.
intros m Hm.
apply IH.
rewrite succ_le_mono.
apply le_trans with k; auto.
rewrite le_succ_l; auto.
Qed.
End FixPoint.
End StrongRecursion.
Arguments strong_rec [A] a f n.
End NStrongRecProp.
|
