1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
|
(************************************************************************)
(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
(* <O___,, * CNRS-Ecole Polytechnique-INRIA Futurs-Universite Paris Sud *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
(* Evgeny Makarov, INRIA, 2007 *)
(************************************************************************)
(*i $Id: ZBinary.v 11040 2008-06-03 00:04:16Z letouzey $ i*)
Require Import ZMulOrder.
Require Import ZArith.
Open Local Scope Z_scope.
Module ZBinAxiomsMod <: ZAxiomsSig.
Module Export NZOrdAxiomsMod <: NZOrdAxiomsSig.
Module Export NZAxiomsMod <: NZAxiomsSig.
Definition NZ := Z.
Definition NZeq := (@eq Z).
Definition NZ0 := 0.
Definition NZsucc := Zsucc'.
Definition NZpred := Zpred'.
Definition NZadd := Zplus.
Definition NZsub := Zminus.
Definition NZmul := Zmult.
Theorem NZeq_equiv : equiv Z NZeq.
Proof.
exact (@eq_equiv Z).
Qed.
Add Relation Z NZeq
reflexivity proved by (proj1 NZeq_equiv)
symmetry proved by (proj2 (proj2 NZeq_equiv))
transitivity proved by (proj1 (proj2 NZeq_equiv))
as NZeq_rel.
Add Morphism NZsucc with signature NZeq ==> NZeq as NZsucc_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZpred with signature NZeq ==> NZeq as NZpred_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZadd with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> NZeq as NZadd_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZsub with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> NZeq as NZsub_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZmul with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> NZeq as NZmul_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Theorem NZpred_succ : forall n : Z, NZpred (NZsucc n) = n.
Proof.
exact Zpred'_succ'.
Qed.
Theorem NZinduction :
forall A : Z -> Prop, predicate_wd NZeq A ->
A 0 -> (forall n : Z, A n <-> A (NZsucc n)) -> forall n : Z, A n.
Proof.
intros A A_wd A0 AS n; apply Zind; clear n.
assumption.
intros; now apply -> AS.
intros n H. rewrite <- (Zsucc'_pred' n) in H. now apply <- AS.
Qed.
Theorem NZadd_0_l : forall n : Z, 0 + n = n.
Proof.
exact Zplus_0_l.
Qed.
Theorem NZadd_succ_l : forall n m : Z, (NZsucc n) + m = NZsucc (n + m).
Proof.
intros; do 2 rewrite <- Zsucc_succ'; apply Zplus_succ_l.
Qed.
Theorem NZsub_0_r : forall n : Z, n - 0 = n.
Proof.
exact Zminus_0_r.
Qed.
Theorem NZsub_succ_r : forall n m : Z, n - (NZsucc m) = NZpred (n - m).
Proof.
intros; rewrite <- Zsucc_succ'; rewrite <- Zpred_pred';
apply Zminus_succ_r.
Qed.
Theorem NZmul_0_l : forall n : Z, 0 * n = 0.
Proof.
reflexivity.
Qed.
Theorem NZmul_succ_l : forall n m : Z, (NZsucc n) * m = n * m + m.
Proof.
intros; rewrite <- Zsucc_succ'; apply Zmult_succ_l.
Qed.
End NZAxiomsMod.
Definition NZlt := Zlt.
Definition NZle := Zle.
Definition NZmin := Zmin.
Definition NZmax := Zmax.
Add Morphism NZlt with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> iff as NZlt_wd.
Proof.
unfold NZeq. intros n1 n2 H1 m1 m2 H2; rewrite H1; now rewrite H2.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZle with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> iff as NZle_wd.
Proof.
unfold NZeq. intros n1 n2 H1 m1 m2 H2; rewrite H1; now rewrite H2.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZmin with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> NZeq as NZmin_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZmax with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> NZeq as NZmax_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Theorem NZlt_eq_cases : forall n m : Z, n <= m <-> n < m \/ n = m.
Proof.
intros n m; split. apply Zle_lt_or_eq.
intro H; destruct H as [H | H]. now apply Zlt_le_weak. rewrite H; apply Zle_refl.
Qed.
Theorem NZlt_irrefl : forall n : Z, ~ n < n.
Proof.
exact Zlt_irrefl.
Qed.
Theorem NZlt_succ_r : forall n m : Z, n < (NZsucc m) <-> n <= m.
Proof.
intros; unfold NZsucc; rewrite <- Zsucc_succ'; split;
[apply Zlt_succ_le | apply Zle_lt_succ].
Qed.
Theorem NZmin_l : forall n m : NZ, n <= m -> NZmin n m = n.
Proof.
unfold NZmin, Zmin, Zle; intros n m H.
destruct (n ?= m); try reflexivity. now elim H.
Qed.
Theorem NZmin_r : forall n m : NZ, m <= n -> NZmin n m = m.
Proof.
unfold NZmin, Zmin, Zle; intros n m H.
case_eq (n ?= m); intro H1; try reflexivity.
now apply Zcompare_Eq_eq.
apply <- Zcompare_Gt_Lt_antisym in H1. now elim H.
Qed.
Theorem NZmax_l : forall n m : NZ, m <= n -> NZmax n m = n.
Proof.
unfold NZmax, Zmax, Zle; intros n m H.
case_eq (n ?= m); intro H1; try reflexivity.
apply <- Zcompare_Gt_Lt_antisym in H1. now elim H.
Qed.
Theorem NZmax_r : forall n m : NZ, n <= m -> NZmax n m = m.
Proof.
unfold NZmax, Zmax, Zle; intros n m H.
case_eq (n ?= m); intro H1.
now apply Zcompare_Eq_eq. reflexivity. now elim H.
Qed.
End NZOrdAxiomsMod.
Definition Zopp (x : Z) :=
match x with
| Z0 => Z0
| Zpos x => Zneg x
| Zneg x => Zpos x
end.
Add Morphism Zopp with signature NZeq ==> NZeq as Zopp_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Theorem Zsucc_pred : forall n : Z, NZsucc (NZpred n) = n.
Proof.
exact Zsucc'_pred'.
Qed.
Theorem Zopp_0 : - 0 = 0.
Proof.
reflexivity.
Qed.
Theorem Zopp_succ : forall n : Z, - (NZsucc n) = NZpred (- n).
Proof.
intro; rewrite <- Zsucc_succ'; rewrite <- Zpred_pred'. apply Zopp_succ.
Qed.
End ZBinAxiomsMod.
Module Export ZBinMulOrderPropMod := ZMulOrderPropFunct ZBinAxiomsMod.
(** Z forms a ring *)
(*Lemma Zring : ring_theory 0 1 NZadd NZmul NZsub Zopp NZeq.
Proof.
constructor.
exact Zadd_0_l.
exact Zadd_comm.
exact Zadd_assoc.
exact Zmul_1_l.
exact Zmul_comm.
exact Zmul_assoc.
exact Zmul_add_distr_r.
intros; now rewrite Zadd_opp_minus.
exact Zadd_opp_r.
Qed.
Add Ring ZR : Zring.*)
(*
Theorem eq_equiv_e : forall x y : Z, E x y <-> e x y.
Proof.
intros x y; unfold E, e, Zeq_bool; split; intro H.
rewrite H; now rewrite Zcompare_refl.
rewrite eq_true_unfold_pos in H.
assert (H1 : (x ?= y) = Eq).
case_eq (x ?= y); intro H1; rewrite H1 in H; simpl in H;
[reflexivity | discriminate H | discriminate H].
now apply Zcompare_Eq_eq.
Qed.
*)
|
