blob: 6398b1252c171d8796ff828083f331d2d6c3c94f (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
|
(* -*- coq-prog-args: ("-emacs-U" "-top" "Coq.Classes.SetoidTactics") -*- *)
(************************************************************************)
(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
(* <O___,, * CNRS-Ecole Polytechnique-INRIA Futurs-Universite Paris Sud *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
(* Tactics for typeclass-based setoids.
*
* Author: Matthieu Sozeau
* Institution: LRI, CNRS UMR 8623 - UniversitÃcopyright Paris Sud
* 91405 Orsay, France *)
(* $Id: SetoidTactics.v 11282 2008-07-28 11:51:53Z msozeau $ *)
Require Export Coq.Classes.RelationClasses.
Require Export Coq.Classes.Morphisms.
Require Export Coq.Classes.Morphisms_Prop.
Require Export Coq.Classes.Equivalence.
Require Export Coq.Relations.Relation_Definitions.
Set Implicit Arguments.
Unset Strict Implicit.
(** Setoid relation on a given support: declares a relation as a setoid
for use with rewrite. It helps choosing if a rewrite should be handled
by setoid_rewrite or the regular rewrite using leibniz equality.
Users can declare an [SetoidRelation A RA] anywhere to declare default
relations. This is also done automatically by the [Declare Relation A RA]
commands. *)
Class SetoidRelation A (R : relation A).
Instance impl_setoid_relation : SetoidRelation impl.
Instance iff_setoid_relation : SetoidRelation iff.
(** Default relation on a given support. Can be used by tactics
to find a sensible default relation on any carrier. Users can
declare an [Instance def : DefaultRelation A RA] anywhere to
declare default relations. *)
Class DefaultRelation A (R : relation A).
(** To search for the default relation, just call [default_relation]. *)
Definition default_relation [ DefaultRelation A R ] := R.
(** Every [Equivalence] gives a default relation, if no other is given (lowest priority). *)
Instance equivalence_default [ Equivalence A R ] : DefaultRelation R | 4.
(** The setoid_replace tactics in Ltac, defined in terms of default relations and
the setoid_rewrite tactic. *)
Ltac setoidreplace H t :=
let Heq := fresh "Heq" in
cut(H) ; unfold default_relation ; [ intro Heq ; setoid_rewrite Heq ; clear Heq | t ].
Ltac setoidreplacein H H' t :=
let Heq := fresh "Heq" in
cut(H) ; unfold default_relation ; [ intro Heq ; setoid_rewrite Heq in H' ; clear Heq | t ].
Ltac setoidreplaceinat H H' t occs :=
let Heq := fresh "Heq" in
cut(H) ; unfold default_relation ; [ intro Heq ; setoid_rewrite Heq in H' at occs ; clear Heq | t ].
Ltac setoidreplaceat H t occs :=
let Heq := fresh "Heq" in
cut(H) ; unfold default_relation ; [ intro Heq ; setoid_rewrite Heq at occs ; clear Heq | t ].
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y) :=
setoidreplace (default_relation x y) idtac.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"at" int_or_var_list(o) :=
setoidreplaceat (default_relation x y) idtac o.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"in" hyp(id) :=
setoidreplacein (default_relation x y) id idtac.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"in" hyp(id)
"at" int_or_var_list(o) :=
setoidreplaceinat (default_relation x y) id idtac o.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"by" tactic3(t) :=
setoidreplace (default_relation x y) ltac:t.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"at" int_or_var_list(o)
"by" tactic3(t) :=
setoidreplaceat (default_relation x y) ltac:t o.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"in" hyp(id)
"by" tactic3(t) :=
setoidreplacein (default_relation x y) id ltac:t.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"in" hyp(id)
"at" int_or_var_list(o)
"by" tactic3(t) :=
setoidreplaceinat (default_relation x y) id ltac:t o.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"using" "relation" constr(rel) :=
setoidreplace (rel x y) idtac.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"using" "relation" constr(rel)
"at" int_or_var_list(o) :=
setoidreplaceat (rel x y) idtac o.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"using" "relation" constr(rel)
"by" tactic3(t) :=
setoidreplace (rel x y) ltac:t.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"using" "relation" constr(rel)
"at" int_or_var_list(o)
"by" tactic3(t) :=
setoidreplaceat (rel x y) ltac:t o.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"using" "relation" constr(rel)
"in" hyp(id) :=
setoidreplacein (rel x y) id idtac.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"using" "relation" constr(rel)
"in" hyp(id)
"at" int_or_var_list(o) :=
setoidreplaceinat (rel x y) id idtac o.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"using" "relation" constr(rel)
"in" hyp(id)
"by" tactic3(t) :=
setoidreplacein (rel x y) id ltac:t.
Tactic Notation "setoid_replace" constr(x) "with" constr(y)
"using" "relation" constr(rel)
"in" hyp(id)
"at" int_or_var_list(o)
"by" tactic3(t) :=
setoidreplaceinat (rel x y) id ltac:t o.
(** The [add_morphism_tactic] tactic is run at each [Add Morphism] command before giving the hand back
to the user to discharge the proof. It essentially amounts to unfold the right amount of [respectful] calls
and substitute leibniz equalities. One can redefine it using [Ltac add_morphism_tactic ::= t]. *)
Require Import Coq.Program.Tactics.
Open Local Scope signature_scope.
Ltac red_subst_eq_morphism concl :=
match concl with
| @Logic.eq ?A ==> ?R' => red ; intros ; subst ; red_subst_eq_morphism R'
| ?R ==> ?R' => red ; intros ; red_subst_eq_morphism R'
| _ => idtac
end.
Ltac destruct_morphism :=
match goal with
| [ |- @Morphism ?A ?R ?m ] => red
end.
Ltac reverse_arrows x :=
match x with
| @Logic.eq ?A ==> ?R' => revert_last ; reverse_arrows R'
| ?R ==> ?R' => do 3 revert_last ; reverse_arrows R'
| _ => idtac
end.
Ltac default_add_morphism_tactic :=
intros ;
(try destruct_morphism) ;
match goal with
| [ |- (?x ==> ?y) _ _ ] => red_subst_eq_morphism (x ==> y) ; reverse_arrows (x ==> y)
end.
Ltac add_morphism_tactic := default_add_morphism_tactic.
Ltac obligation_tactic ::= program_simpl.
|
