diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'theories/Numbers/Cyclic/Int31/Cyclic31.v')
| -rw-r--r-- | theories/Numbers/Cyclic/Int31/Cyclic31.v | 609 |
1 files changed, 298 insertions, 311 deletions
diff --git a/theories/Numbers/Cyclic/Int31/Cyclic31.v b/theories/Numbers/Cyclic/Int31/Cyclic31.v index 2dd1c3ee..385217d0 100644 --- a/theories/Numbers/Cyclic/Int31/Cyclic31.v +++ b/theories/Numbers/Cyclic/Int31/Cyclic31.v @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ (************************************************************************) (* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *) -(* <O___,, * INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2010 *) +(* <O___,, * INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2012 *) (* \VV/ **************************************************************) (* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *) (* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *) @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ Section Basics. (** Variant of [phi] via [recrbis] *) Let Phi := fun b (_:int31) => - match b with D0 => Zdouble | D1 => Zdouble_plus_one end. + match b with D0 => Z.double | D1 => Z.succ_double end. Definition phibis_aux n x := recrbis_aux n _ Z0 Phi x. @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ Section Basics. (** Recursive equations satisfied by [phi] *) Lemma phi_eqn1 : forall x, firstr x = D0 -> - phi x = Zdouble (phi (shiftr x)). + phi x = Z.double (phi (shiftr x)). Proof. intros. case_eq (iszero x); intros. @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ Section Basics. Qed. Lemma phi_eqn2 : forall x, firstr x = D1 -> - phi x = Zdouble_plus_one (phi (shiftr x)). + phi x = Z.succ_double (phi (shiftr x)). Proof. intros. case_eq (iszero x); intros. @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ Section Basics. Qed. Lemma phi_twice_firstl : forall x, firstl x = D0 -> - phi (twice x) = Zdouble (phi x). + phi (twice x) = Z.double (phi x). Proof. intros. rewrite phi_eqn1; auto; [ | destruct x; auto ]. @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ Section Basics. Qed. Lemma phi_twice_plus_one_firstl : forall x, firstl x = D0 -> - phi (twice_plus_one x) = Zdouble_plus_one (phi x). + phi (twice_plus_one x) = Z.succ_double (phi x). Proof. intros. rewrite phi_eqn2; auto; [ | destruct x; auto ]. @@ -430,13 +430,13 @@ Section Basics. unfold phibis_aux, recrbis_aux; fold recrbis_aux; fold (phibis_aux n (shiftr x)). destruct (firstr x). - specialize IHn with (shiftr x); rewrite Zdouble_mult; omega. - specialize IHn with (shiftr x); rewrite Zdouble_plus_one_mult; omega. + specialize IHn with (shiftr x); rewrite Z.double_spec; omega. + specialize IHn with (shiftr x); rewrite Z.succ_double_spec; omega. Qed. Lemma phibis_aux_bounded : forall n x, n <= size -> - (phibis_aux n (nshiftr (size-n) x) < 2 ^ (Z_of_nat n))%Z. + (phibis_aux n (nshiftr (size-n) x) < 2 ^ (Z.of_nat n))%Z. Proof. induction n. simpl; unfold phibis_aux; simpl; auto with zarith. @@ -450,13 +450,13 @@ Section Basics. assert (H1 : n <= size) by omega. specialize (IHn x H1). set (y:=phibis_aux n (nshiftr (size - n) x)) in *. - rewrite inj_S, Zpower_Zsucc; auto with zarith. + rewrite Nat2Z.inj_succ, Z.pow_succ_r; auto with zarith. case_eq (firstr (nshiftr (size - S n) x)); intros. - rewrite Zdouble_mult; auto with zarith. - rewrite Zdouble_plus_one_mult; auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.double_spec; auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.succ_double_spec; auto with zarith. Qed. - Lemma phi_bounded : forall x, (0 <= phi x < 2 ^ (Z_of_nat size))%Z. + Lemma phi_bounded : forall x, (0 <= phi x < 2 ^ (Z.of_nat size))%Z. Proof. intros. rewrite <- phibis_aux_equiv. @@ -468,32 +468,32 @@ Section Basics. Lemma phibis_aux_lowerbound : forall n x, firstr (nshiftr n x) = D1 -> - (2 ^ Z_of_nat n <= phibis_aux (S n) x)%Z. + (2 ^ Z.of_nat n <= phibis_aux (S n) x)%Z. Proof. induction n. intros. unfold nshiftr in H; simpl in *. unfold phibis_aux, recrbis_aux. - rewrite H, Zdouble_plus_one_mult; omega. + rewrite H, Z.succ_double_spec; omega. intros. remember (S n) as m. unfold phibis_aux, recrbis_aux; fold recrbis_aux; fold (phibis_aux m (shiftr x)). subst m. - rewrite inj_S, Zpower_Zsucc; auto with zarith. - assert (2^(Z_of_nat n) <= phibis_aux (S n) (shiftr x))%Z. + rewrite Nat2Z.inj_succ, Z.pow_succ_r; auto with zarith. + assert (2^(Z.of_nat n) <= phibis_aux (S n) (shiftr x))%Z. apply IHn. rewrite <- nshiftr_S_tail; auto. destruct (firstr x). - change (Zdouble (phibis_aux (S n) (shiftr x))) with + change (Z.double (phibis_aux (S n) (shiftr x))) with (2*(phibis_aux (S n) (shiftr x)))%Z. omega. - rewrite Zdouble_plus_one_mult; omega. + rewrite Z.succ_double_spec; omega. Qed. Lemma phi_lowerbound : - forall x, firstl x = D1 -> (2^(Z_of_nat (pred size)) <= phi x)%Z. + forall x, firstl x = D1 -> (2^(Z.of_nat (pred size)) <= phi x)%Z. Proof. intros. generalize (phibis_aux_lowerbound (pred size) x). @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ Section Basics. (** First, recursive equations *) Lemma phi_inv_double_plus_one : forall z, - phi_inv (Zdouble_plus_one z) = twice_plus_one (phi_inv z). + phi_inv (Z.succ_double z) = twice_plus_one (phi_inv z). Proof. destruct z; simpl; auto. induction p; simpl. @@ -788,20 +788,20 @@ Section Basics. Qed. Lemma phi_inv_double : forall z, - phi_inv (Zdouble z) = twice (phi_inv z). + phi_inv (Z.double z) = twice (phi_inv z). Proof. destruct z; simpl; auto. rewrite incr_twice_plus_one; auto. Qed. Lemma phi_inv_incr : forall z, - phi_inv (Zsucc z) = incr (phi_inv z). + phi_inv (Z.succ z) = incr (phi_inv z). Proof. destruct z. simpl; auto. simpl; auto. induction p; simpl; auto. - rewrite Pplus_one_succ_r, IHp, incr_twice_plus_one; auto. + rewrite <- Pos.add_1_r, IHp, incr_twice_plus_one; auto. rewrite incr_twice; auto. simpl; auto. destruct p; simpl; auto. @@ -908,15 +908,15 @@ Section Basics. Local Open Scope Z_scope. Lemma p2ibis_spec : forall n p, (n<=size)%nat -> - Zpos p = (Z_of_N (fst (p2ibis n p)))*2^(Z_of_nat n) + + Zpos p = (Z.of_N (fst (p2ibis n p)))*2^(Z.of_nat n) + phi (snd (p2ibis n p)). Proof. induction n; intros. - simpl; rewrite Pmult_1_r; auto. - replace (2^(Z_of_nat (S n)))%Z with (2*2^(Z_of_nat n))%Z by - (rewrite <- Zpower_Zsucc, <- Zpos_P_of_succ_nat; + simpl; rewrite Pos.mul_1_r; auto. + replace (2^(Z.of_nat (S n)))%Z with (2*2^(Z.of_nat n))%Z by + (rewrite <- Z.pow_succ_r, <- Zpos_P_of_succ_nat; auto with zarith). - rewrite (Zmult_comm 2). + rewrite (Z.mul_comm 2). assert (n<=size)%nat by omega. destruct p; simpl; [ | | auto]; specialize (IHn p H0); @@ -924,13 +924,13 @@ Section Basics. destruct (p2ibis n p) as (r,i); simpl in *; intros. change (Zpos p~1) with (2*Zpos p + 1)%Z. - rewrite phi_twice_plus_one_firstl, Zdouble_plus_one_mult. + rewrite phi_twice_plus_one_firstl, Z.succ_double_spec. rewrite IHn; ring. apply (nshiftr_0_firstl n); auto; try omega. change (Zpos p~0) with (2*Zpos p)%Z. rewrite phi_twice_firstl. - change (Zdouble (phi i)) with (2*(phi i))%Z. + change (Z.double (phi i)) with (2*(phi i))%Z. rewrite IHn; ring. apply (nshiftr_0_firstl n); auto; try omega. Qed. @@ -956,12 +956,12 @@ Section Basics. for the positive case. *) Lemma phi_phi_inv_positive : forall p, - phi (phi_inv_positive p) = (Zpos p) mod (2^(Z_of_nat size)). + phi (phi_inv_positive p) = (Zpos p) mod (2^(Z.of_nat size)). Proof. intros. replace (phi_inv_positive p) with (snd (p2ibis size p)). rewrite (p2ibis_spec size p) by auto. - rewrite Zplus_comm, Z_mod_plus. + rewrite Z.add_comm, Z_mod_plus. symmetry; apply Zmod_small. apply phi_bounded. auto with zarith. @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ Section Basics. Proof. intros. unfold mul31. - rewrite <- Zdouble_mult, <- phi_twice_firstl, phi_inv_phi; auto. + rewrite <- Z.double_spec, <- phi_twice_firstl, phi_inv_phi; auto. Qed. Lemma double_twice_plus_one_firstl : forall x, firstl x = D0 -> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ Section Basics. intros. rewrite double_twice_firstl; auto. unfold add31. - rewrite phi_twice_firstl, <- Zdouble_plus_one_mult, + rewrite phi_twice_firstl, <- Z.succ_double_spec, <- phi_twice_plus_one_firstl, phi_inv_phi; auto. Qed. @@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ Section Basics. Qed. Lemma positive_to_int31_spec : forall p, - Zpos p = (Z_of_N (fst (positive_to_int31 p)))*2^(Z_of_nat size) + + Zpos p = (Z.of_N (fst (positive_to_int31 p)))*2^(Z.of_nat size) + phi (snd (positive_to_int31 p)). Proof. unfold positive_to_int31. @@ -1029,43 +1029,43 @@ Section Basics. [phi o twice] and so one. *) Lemma phi_twice : forall x, - phi (twice x) = (Zdouble (phi x)) mod 2^(Z_of_nat size). + phi (twice x) = (Z.double (phi x)) mod 2^(Z.of_nat size). Proof. intros. pattern x at 1; rewrite <- (phi_inv_phi x). rewrite <- phi_inv_double. - assert (0 <= Zdouble (phi x)). - rewrite Zdouble_mult; generalize (phi_bounded x); omega. - destruct (Zdouble (phi x)). + assert (0 <= Z.double (phi x)). + rewrite Z.double_spec; generalize (phi_bounded x); omega. + destruct (Z.double (phi x)). simpl; auto. apply phi_phi_inv_positive. compute in H; elim H; auto. Qed. Lemma phi_twice_plus_one : forall x, - phi (twice_plus_one x) = (Zdouble_plus_one (phi x)) mod 2^(Z_of_nat size). + phi (twice_plus_one x) = (Z.succ_double (phi x)) mod 2^(Z.of_nat size). Proof. intros. pattern x at 1; rewrite <- (phi_inv_phi x). rewrite <- phi_inv_double_plus_one. - assert (0 <= Zdouble_plus_one (phi x)). - rewrite Zdouble_plus_one_mult; generalize (phi_bounded x); omega. - destruct (Zdouble_plus_one (phi x)). + assert (0 <= Z.succ_double (phi x)). + rewrite Z.succ_double_spec; generalize (phi_bounded x); omega. + destruct (Z.succ_double (phi x)). simpl; auto. apply phi_phi_inv_positive. compute in H; elim H; auto. Qed. Lemma phi_incr : forall x, - phi (incr x) = (Zsucc (phi x)) mod 2^(Z_of_nat size). + phi (incr x) = (Z.succ (phi x)) mod 2^(Z.of_nat size). Proof. intros. pattern x at 1; rewrite <- (phi_inv_phi x). rewrite <- phi_inv_incr. - assert (0 <= Zsucc (phi x)). - change (Zsucc (phi x)) with ((phi x)+1)%Z; + assert (0 <= Z.succ (phi x)). + change (Z.succ (phi x)) with ((phi x)+1)%Z; generalize (phi_bounded x); omega. - destruct (Zsucc (phi x)). + destruct (Z.succ (phi x)). simpl; auto. apply phi_phi_inv_positive. compute in H; elim H; auto. @@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ Section Basics. in the negative case *) Lemma phi_phi_inv_negative : - forall p, phi (incr (complement_negative p)) = (Zneg p) mod 2^(Z_of_nat size). + forall p, phi (incr (complement_negative p)) = (Zneg p) mod 2^(Z.of_nat size). Proof. induction p. @@ -1083,21 +1083,21 @@ Section Basics. rewrite phi_incr in IHp. rewrite incr_twice, phi_twice_plus_one. remember (phi (complement_negative p)) as q. - rewrite Zdouble_plus_one_mult. - replace (2*q+1) with (2*(Zsucc q)-1) by omega. + rewrite Z.succ_double_spec. + replace (2*q+1) with (2*(Z.succ q)-1) by omega. rewrite <- Zminus_mod_idemp_l, <- Zmult_mod_idemp_r, IHp. rewrite Zmult_mod_idemp_r, Zminus_mod_idemp_l; auto with zarith. simpl complement_negative. rewrite incr_twice_plus_one, phi_twice. remember (phi (incr (complement_negative p))) as q. - rewrite Zdouble_mult, IHp, Zmult_mod_idemp_r; auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.double_spec, IHp, Zmult_mod_idemp_r; auto with zarith. simpl; auto. Qed. Lemma phi_phi_inv : - forall z, phi (phi_inv z) = z mod 2 ^ (Z_of_nat size). + forall z, phi (phi_inv z) = z mod 2 ^ (Z.of_nat size). Proof. destruct z. simpl; auto. @@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ Section Int31_Specs. Notation "[| x |]" := (phi x) (at level 0, x at level 99). - Local Notation wB := (2 ^ (Z_of_nat size)). + Local Notation wB := (2 ^ (Z.of_nat size)). Lemma wB_pos : wB > 0. Proof. @@ -1221,14 +1221,14 @@ Section Int31_Specs. set (X:=[|x|]) in *; set (Y:=[|y|]) in *; clearbody X Y. assert ((X+Y) mod wB ?= X+Y <> Eq -> [+|C1 (phi_inv (X+Y))|] = X+Y). - unfold interp_carry; rewrite phi_phi_inv, Zcompare_Eq_iff_eq; intros. + unfold interp_carry; rewrite phi_phi_inv, Z.compare_eq_iff; intros. destruct (Z_lt_le_dec (X+Y) wB). contradict H1; auto using Zmod_small with zarith. rewrite <- (Z_mod_plus_full (X+Y) (-1) wB). rewrite Zmod_small; romega. - generalize (Zcompare_Eq_eq ((X+Y) mod wB) (X+Y)); intros Heq. - destruct Zcompare; intros; + generalize (Z.compare_eq ((X+Y) mod wB) (X+Y)); intros Heq. + destruct Z.compare; intros; [ rewrite phi_phi_inv; auto | now apply H1 | now apply H1]. Qed. @@ -1245,14 +1245,14 @@ Section Int31_Specs. set (X:=[|x|]) in *; set (Y:=[|y|]) in *; clearbody X Y. assert ((X+Y+1) mod wB ?= X+Y+1 <> Eq -> [+|C1 (phi_inv (X+Y+1))|] = X+Y+1). - unfold interp_carry; rewrite phi_phi_inv, Zcompare_Eq_iff_eq; intros. + unfold interp_carry; rewrite phi_phi_inv, Z.compare_eq_iff; intros. destruct (Z_lt_le_dec (X+Y+1) wB). contradict H1; auto using Zmod_small with zarith. rewrite <- (Z_mod_plus_full (X+Y+1) (-1) wB). rewrite Zmod_small; romega. - generalize (Zcompare_Eq_eq ((X+Y+1) mod wB) (X+Y+1)); intros Heq. - destruct Zcompare; intros; + generalize (Z.compare_eq ((X+Y+1) mod wB) (X+Y+1)); intros Heq. + destruct Z.compare; intros; [ rewrite phi_phi_inv; auto | now apply H1 | now apply H1]. Qed. @@ -1284,14 +1284,14 @@ Section Int31_Specs. set (X:=[|x|]) in *; set (Y:=[|y|]) in *; clearbody X Y. assert ((X-Y) mod wB ?= X-Y <> Eq -> [-|C1 (phi_inv (X-Y))|] = X-Y). - unfold interp_carry; rewrite phi_phi_inv, Zcompare_Eq_iff_eq; intros. + unfold interp_carry; rewrite phi_phi_inv, Z.compare_eq_iff; intros. destruct (Z_lt_le_dec (X-Y) 0). rewrite <- (Z_mod_plus_full (X-Y) 1 wB). rewrite Zmod_small; romega. contradict H1; apply Zmod_small; romega. - generalize (Zcompare_Eq_eq ((X-Y) mod wB) (X-Y)); intros Heq. - destruct Zcompare; intros; + generalize (Z.compare_eq ((X-Y) mod wB) (X-Y)); intros Heq. + destruct Z.compare; intros; [ rewrite phi_phi_inv; auto | now apply H1 | now apply H1]. Qed. @@ -1303,14 +1303,14 @@ Section Int31_Specs. set (X:=[|x|]) in *; set (Y:=[|y|]) in *; clearbody X Y. assert ((X-Y-1) mod wB ?= X-Y-1 <> Eq -> [-|C1 (phi_inv (X-Y-1))|] = X-Y-1). - unfold interp_carry; rewrite phi_phi_inv, Zcompare_Eq_iff_eq; intros. + unfold interp_carry; rewrite phi_phi_inv, Z.compare_eq_iff; intros. destruct (Z_lt_le_dec (X-Y-1) 0). rewrite <- (Z_mod_plus_full (X-Y-1) 1 wB). rewrite Zmod_small; romega. contradict H1; apply Zmod_small; romega. - generalize (Zcompare_Eq_eq ((X-Y-1) mod wB) (X-Y-1)); intros Heq. - destruct Zcompare; intros; + generalize (Z.compare_eq ((X-Y-1) mod wB) (X-Y-1)); intros Heq. + destruct Z.compare; intros; [ rewrite phi_phi_inv; auto | now apply H1 | now apply H1]. Qed. @@ -1386,7 +1386,7 @@ Section Int31_Specs. apply Zmod_small. generalize (phi_bounded x)(phi_bounded y); intros. change (wB^2) with (wB * wB). - auto using Zmult_lt_compat with zarith. + auto using Z.mul_lt_mono_nonneg with zarith. Qed. Lemma spec_mul : forall x y, [|x*y|] = ([|x|] * [|y|]) mod wB. @@ -1412,29 +1412,26 @@ Section Int31_Specs. generalize (phi_bounded a1)(phi_bounded a2)(phi_bounded b); intros. assert ([|b|]>0) by (auto with zarith). generalize (Z_div_mod (phi2 a1 a2) [|b|] H4) (Z_div_pos (phi2 a1 a2) [|b|] H4). - unfold Zdiv; destruct (Zdiv_eucl (phi2 a1 a2) [|b|]); simpl. + unfold Z.div; destruct (Z.div_eucl (phi2 a1 a2) [|b|]); simpl. rewrite ?phi_phi_inv. destruct 1; intros. unfold phi2 in *. change base with wB; change base with wB in H5. - change (Zpower_pos 2 31) with wB; change (Zpower_pos 2 31) with wB in H. - rewrite H5, Zmult_comm. + change (Z.pow_pos 2 31) with wB; change (Z.pow_pos 2 31) with wB in H. + rewrite H5, Z.mul_comm. replace (z0 mod wB) with z0 by (symmetry; apply Zmod_small; omega). replace (z mod wB) with z; auto with zarith. symmetry; apply Zmod_small. split. apply H7; change base with wB; auto with zarith. - apply Zmult_gt_0_lt_reg_r with [|b|]. - omega. - rewrite Zmult_comm. - apply Zle_lt_trans with ([|b|]*z+z0). - omega. + apply Z.mul_lt_mono_pos_r with [|b|]; [omega| ]. + rewrite Z.mul_comm. + apply Z.le_lt_trans with ([|b|]*z+z0); [omega| ]. rewrite <- H5. - apply Zle_lt_trans with ([|a1|]*wB+(wB-1)). - omega. + apply Z.le_lt_trans with ([|a1|]*wB+(wB-1)); [omega | ]. replace ([|a1|]*wB+(wB-1)) with (wB*([|a1|]+1)-1) by ring. assert (wB*([|a1|]+1) <= wB*[|b|]); try omega. - apply Zmult_le_compat; omega. + apply Z.mul_le_mono_nonneg; omega. Qed. Lemma spec_div : forall a b, 0 < [|b|] -> @@ -1445,20 +1442,20 @@ Section Int31_Specs. unfold div31; intros. assert ([|b|]>0) by (auto with zarith). generalize (Z_div_mod [|a|] [|b|] H0) (Z_div_pos [|a|] [|b|] H0). - unfold Zdiv; destruct (Zdiv_eucl [|a|] [|b|]); simpl. + unfold Z.div; destruct (Z.div_eucl [|a|] [|b|]); simpl. rewrite ?phi_phi_inv. destruct 1; intros. - rewrite H1, Zmult_comm. + rewrite H1, Z.mul_comm. generalize (phi_bounded a)(phi_bounded b); intros. replace (z0 mod wB) with z0 by (symmetry; apply Zmod_small; omega). replace (z mod wB) with z; auto with zarith. symmetry; apply Zmod_small. split; auto with zarith. - apply Zle_lt_trans with [|a|]; auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_lt_trans with [|a|]; auto with zarith. rewrite H1. - apply Zle_trans with ([|b|]*z); try omega. - rewrite <- (Zmult_1_l z) at 1. - apply Zmult_le_compat; auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_trans with ([|b|]*z); try omega. + rewrite <- (Z.mul_1_l z) at 1. + apply Z.mul_le_mono_nonneg; auto with zarith. Qed. Lemma spec_mod : forall a b, 0 < [|b|] -> @@ -1466,9 +1463,9 @@ Section Int31_Specs. Proof. unfold div31; intros. assert ([|b|]>0) by (auto with zarith). - unfold Zmod. + unfold Z.modulo. generalize (Z_div_mod [|a|] [|b|] H0). - destruct (Zdiv_eucl [|a|] [|b|]); simpl. + destruct (Z.div_eucl [|a|] [|b|]); simpl. rewrite ?phi_phi_inv. destruct 1; intros. generalize (phi_bounded b); intros. @@ -1506,12 +1503,12 @@ Section Int31_Specs. destruct [|b|]. unfold size; auto with zarith. intros (_,H). - cut (Psize p <= size)%nat; [ omega | rewrite <- Zpower2_Psize; auto]. + cut (Pos.size_nat p <= size)%nat; [ omega | rewrite <- Zpower2_Psize; auto]. intros (H,_); compute in H; elim H; auto. Qed. Lemma iter_int31_iter_nat : forall A f i a, - iter_int31 i A f a = iter_nat (Zabs_nat [|i|]) A f a. + iter_int31 i A f a = iter_nat (Z.abs_nat [|i|]) A f a. Proof. intros. unfold iter_int31. @@ -1528,15 +1525,15 @@ Section Int31_Specs. rewrite <- iter_nat_plus. f_equal. - rewrite Zdouble_mult, Zmult_comm, <- Zplus_diag_eq_mult_2. - symmetry; apply Zabs_nat_Zplus; auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.double_spec, <- Z.add_diag. + symmetry; apply Zabs2Nat.inj_add; auto with zarith. - change (iter_nat (S (Zabs_nat z + Zabs_nat z)) A f a = - iter_nat (Zabs_nat (Zdouble_plus_one z)) A f a); f_equal. - rewrite Zdouble_plus_one_mult, Zmult_comm, <- Zplus_diag_eq_mult_2. - rewrite Zabs_nat_Zplus; auto with zarith. - rewrite Zabs_nat_Zplus; auto with zarith. - change (Zabs_nat 1) with 1%nat; omega. + change (iter_nat (S (Z.abs_nat z + Z.abs_nat z)) A f a = + iter_nat (Z.abs_nat (Z.succ_double z)) A f a); f_equal. + rewrite Z.succ_double_spec, <- Z.add_diag. + rewrite Zabs2Nat.inj_add; auto with zarith. + rewrite Zabs2Nat.inj_add; auto with zarith. + change (Z.abs_nat 1) with 1%nat; omega. Qed. Fixpoint addmuldiv31_alt n i j := @@ -1546,12 +1543,12 @@ Section Int31_Specs. end. Lemma addmuldiv31_equiv : forall p x y, - addmuldiv31 p x y = addmuldiv31_alt (Zabs_nat [|p|]) x y. + addmuldiv31 p x y = addmuldiv31_alt (Z.abs_nat [|p|]) x y. Proof. intros. unfold addmuldiv31. rewrite iter_int31_iter_nat. - set (n:=Zabs_nat [|p|]); clearbody n; clear p. + set (n:=Z.abs_nat [|p|]); clearbody n; clear p. revert x y; induction n. simpl; auto. intros. @@ -1566,21 +1563,21 @@ Section Int31_Specs. Proof. intros. rewrite addmuldiv31_equiv. - assert ([|p|] = Z_of_nat (Zabs_nat [|p|])). - rewrite inj_Zabs_nat; symmetry; apply Zabs_eq. + assert ([|p|] = Z.of_nat (Z.abs_nat [|p|])). + rewrite Zabs2Nat.id_abs; symmetry; apply Z.abs_eq. destruct (phi_bounded p); auto. - rewrite H0; rewrite H0 in H; clear H0; rewrite Zabs_nat_Z_of_nat. - set (n := Zabs_nat [|p|]) in *; clearbody n. + rewrite H0; rewrite H0 in H; clear H0; rewrite Zabs2Nat.id. + set (n := Z.abs_nat [|p|]) in *; clearbody n. assert (n <= 31)%nat. - rewrite inj_le_iff; auto with zarith. + rewrite Nat2Z.inj_le; auto with zarith. clear p H; revert x y. induction n. simpl; intros. - change (Zpower_pos 2 31) with (2^31). - rewrite Zmult_1_r. + change (Z.pow_pos 2 31) with (2^31). + rewrite Z.mul_1_r. replace ([|y|] / 2^31) with 0. - rewrite Zplus_0_r. + rewrite Z.add_0_r. symmetry; apply Zmod_small; apply phi_bounded. symmetry; apply Zdiv_small; apply phi_bounded. @@ -1588,43 +1585,43 @@ Section Int31_Specs. rewrite IHn; [ | omega ]. case_eq (firstl y); intros. - rewrite phi_twice, Zdouble_mult. + rewrite phi_twice, Z.double_spec. rewrite phi_twice_firstl; auto. - change (Zdouble [|y|]) with (2*[|y|]). - rewrite inj_S, Zpower_Zsucc; auto with zarith. + change (Z.double [|y|]) with (2*[|y|]). + rewrite Nat2Z.inj_succ, Z.pow_succ_r; auto with zarith. rewrite Zplus_mod; rewrite Zmult_mod_idemp_l; rewrite <- Zplus_mod. f_equal. - apply Zplus_eq_compat. + f_equal. ring. - replace (31-Z_of_nat n) with (Zsucc(31-Zsucc(Z_of_nat n))) by ring. - rewrite Zpower_Zsucc, <- Zdiv_Zdiv; auto with zarith. - rewrite Zmult_comm, Z_div_mult; auto with zarith. + replace (31-Z.of_nat n) with (Z.succ(31-Z.succ(Z.of_nat n))) by ring. + rewrite Z.pow_succ_r, <- Zdiv_Zdiv; auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.mul_comm, Z_div_mult; auto with zarith. - rewrite phi_twice_plus_one, Zdouble_plus_one_mult. + rewrite phi_twice_plus_one, Z.succ_double_spec. rewrite phi_twice; auto. - change (Zdouble [|y|]) with (2*[|y|]). - rewrite inj_S, Zpower_Zsucc; auto with zarith. + change (Z.double [|y|]) with (2*[|y|]). + rewrite Nat2Z.inj_succ, Z.pow_succ_r; auto with zarith. rewrite Zplus_mod; rewrite Zmult_mod_idemp_l; rewrite <- Zplus_mod. - rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_l, Zmult_1_l, <- Zplus_assoc. + rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_r, Z.mul_1_l, <- Z.add_assoc. + f_equal. f_equal. - apply Zplus_eq_compat. ring. assert ((2*[|y|]) mod wB = 2*[|y|] - wB). clear - H. symmetry. apply Zmod_unique with 1; [ | ring ]. generalize (phi_lowerbound _ H) (phi_bounded y). - set (wB' := 2^Z_of_nat (pred size)). + set (wB' := 2^Z.of_nat (pred size)). replace wB with (2*wB'); [ omega | ]. - unfold wB'. rewrite <- Zpower_Zsucc, <- inj_S by (auto with zarith). + unfold wB'. rewrite <- Z.pow_succ_r, <- Nat2Z.inj_succ by (auto with zarith). f_equal. rewrite H1. - replace wB with (2^(Z_of_nat n)*2^(31-Z_of_nat n)) by + replace wB with (2^(Z.of_nat n)*2^(31-Z.of_nat n)) by (rewrite <- Zpower_exp; auto with zarith; f_equal; unfold size; ring). - unfold Zminus; rewrite Zopp_mult_distr_l. + unfold Z.sub; rewrite <- Z.mul_opp_l. rewrite Z_div_plus; auto with zarith. ring_simplify. - replace (31+-Z_of_nat n) with (Zsucc(31-Zsucc(Z_of_nat n))) by ring. - rewrite Zpower_Zsucc, <- Zdiv_Zdiv; auto with zarith. - rewrite Zmult_comm, Z_div_mult; auto with zarith. + replace (31+-Z.of_nat n) with (Z.succ(31-Z.succ(Z.of_nat n))) by ring. + rewrite Z.pow_succ_r, <- Zdiv_Zdiv; auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.mul_comm, Z_div_mult; auto with zarith. Qed. Lemma spec_pos_mod : forall w p, @@ -1637,25 +1634,25 @@ Section Int31_Specs. generalize (phi_bounded w). symmetry; apply Zmod_small. split; auto with zarith. - apply Zlt_le_trans with wB; auto with zarith. + apply Z.lt_le_trans with wB; auto with zarith. apply Zpower_le_monotone; auto with zarith. intros. case_eq ([|p|] ?= 31); intros; - [ apply H; rewrite (Zcompare_Eq_eq _ _ H0); auto with zarith | | + [ apply H; rewrite (Z.compare_eq _ _ H0); auto with zarith | | apply H; change ([|p|]>31)%Z in H0; auto with zarith ]. change ([|p|]<31) in H0. rewrite spec_add_mul_div by auto with zarith. - change [|0|] with 0%Z; rewrite Zmult_0_l, Zplus_0_l. + change [|0|] with 0%Z; rewrite Z.mul_0_l, Z.add_0_l. generalize (phi_bounded p)(phi_bounded w); intros. assert (31-[|p|]<wB). - apply Zle_lt_trans with 31%Z; auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_lt_trans with 31%Z; auto with zarith. compute; auto. assert ([|31-p|]=31-[|p|]). unfold sub31; rewrite phi_phi_inv. change [|31|] with 31%Z. apply Zmod_small; auto with zarith. rewrite spec_add_mul_div by (rewrite H4; auto with zarith). - change [|0|] with 0%Z; rewrite Zdiv_0_l, Zplus_0_r. + change [|0|] with 0%Z; rewrite Zdiv_0_l, Z.add_0_r. rewrite H4. apply shift_unshift_mod_2; auto with zarith. Qed. @@ -1682,7 +1679,7 @@ Section Int31_Specs. end. Lemma head031_equiv : - forall x, [|head031 x|] = Z_of_nat (head031_alt size x). + forall x, [|head031 x|] = Z.of_nat (head031_alt size x). Proof. intros. case_eq (iszero x); intros. @@ -1690,7 +1687,7 @@ Section Int31_Specs. simpl; auto. unfold head031, recl. - change On with (phi_inv (Z_of_nat (31-size))). + change On with (phi_inv (Z.of_nat (31-size))). replace (head031_alt size x) with (head031_alt size x + (31 - size))%nat by auto. assert (size <= 31)%nat by auto with arith. @@ -1700,12 +1697,12 @@ Section Int31_Specs. unfold recl_aux; fold recl_aux. unfold head031_alt; fold head031_alt. rewrite H. - assert ([|phi_inv (Z_of_nat (31-S n))|] = Z_of_nat (31 - S n)). + assert ([|phi_inv (Z.of_nat (31-S n))|] = Z.of_nat (31 - S n)). rewrite phi_phi_inv. apply Zmod_small. split. - change 0 with (Z_of_nat O); apply inj_le; omega. - apply Zle_lt_trans with (Z_of_nat 31). + change 0 with (Z.of_nat O); apply inj_le; omega. + apply Z.le_lt_trans with (Z.of_nat 31). apply inj_le; omega. compute; auto. case_eq (firstl x); intros; auto. @@ -1718,7 +1715,7 @@ Section Int31_Specs. f_equal. change [|In|] with 1. replace (31-n)%nat with (S (31 - S n))%nat by omega. - rewrite inj_S; ring. + rewrite Nat2Z.inj_succ; ring. clear - H H2. rewrite (sneakr_shiftl x) in H. @@ -1747,16 +1744,16 @@ Section Int31_Specs. revert x H H0. unfold size at 2 5. induction size. - simpl Z_of_nat. + simpl Z.of_nat. intros. compute in H0; rewrite H0 in H; discriminate. intros. simpl head031_alt. case_eq (firstl x); intros. - rewrite (inj_S (head031_alt n (shiftl x))), Zpower_Zsucc; auto with zarith. - rewrite <- Zmult_assoc, Zmult_comm, <- Zmult_assoc, <-(Zmult_comm 2). - rewrite <- Zdouble_mult, <- (phi_twice_firstl _ H1). + rewrite (Nat2Z.inj_succ (head031_alt n (shiftl x))), Z.pow_succ_r; auto with zarith. + rewrite <- Z.mul_assoc, Z.mul_comm, <- Z.mul_assoc, <-(Z.mul_comm 2). + rewrite <- Z.double_spec, <- (phi_twice_firstl _ H1). apply IHn. rewrite phi_nz; rewrite phi_nz in H; contradict H. @@ -1765,9 +1762,9 @@ Section Int31_Specs. rewrite <- nshiftl_S_tail; auto. - change (2^(Z_of_nat 0)) with 1; rewrite Zmult_1_l. + change (2^(Z.of_nat 0)) with 1; rewrite Z.mul_1_l. generalize (phi_bounded x); unfold size; split; auto with zarith. - change (2^(Z_of_nat 31)/2) with (2^(Z_of_nat (pred size))). + change (2^(Z.of_nat 31)/2) with (2^(Z.of_nat (pred size))). apply phi_lowerbound; auto. Qed. @@ -1790,7 +1787,7 @@ Section Int31_Specs. end. Lemma tail031_equiv : - forall x, [|tail031 x|] = Z_of_nat (tail031_alt size x). + forall x, [|tail031 x|] = Z.of_nat (tail031_alt size x). Proof. intros. case_eq (iszero x); intros. @@ -1798,7 +1795,7 @@ Section Int31_Specs. simpl; auto. unfold tail031, recr. - change On with (phi_inv (Z_of_nat (31-size))). + change On with (phi_inv (Z.of_nat (31-size))). replace (tail031_alt size x) with (tail031_alt size x + (31 - size))%nat by auto. assert (size <= 31)%nat by auto with arith. @@ -1808,12 +1805,12 @@ Section Int31_Specs. unfold recr_aux; fold recr_aux. unfold tail031_alt; fold tail031_alt. rewrite H. - assert ([|phi_inv (Z_of_nat (31-S n))|] = Z_of_nat (31 - S n)). + assert ([|phi_inv (Z.of_nat (31-S n))|] = Z.of_nat (31 - S n)). rewrite phi_phi_inv. apply Zmod_small. split. - change 0 with (Z_of_nat O); apply inj_le; omega. - apply Zle_lt_trans with (Z_of_nat 31). + change 0 with (Z.of_nat O); apply inj_le; omega. + apply Z.le_lt_trans with (Z.of_nat 31). apply inj_le; omega. compute; auto. case_eq (firstr x); intros; auto. @@ -1826,7 +1823,7 @@ Section Int31_Specs. f_equal. change [|In|] with 1. replace (31-n)%nat with (S (31 - S n))%nat by omega. - rewrite inj_S; ring. + rewrite Nat2Z.inj_succ; ring. clear - H H2. rewrite (sneakl_shiftr x) in H. @@ -1844,14 +1841,14 @@ Section Int31_Specs. apply nshiftr_size. revert x H H0. induction size. - simpl Z_of_nat. + simpl Z.of_nat. intros. compute in H0; rewrite H0 in H; discriminate. intros. simpl tail031_alt. case_eq (firstr x); intros. - rewrite (inj_S (tail031_alt n (shiftr x))), Zpower_Zsucc; auto with zarith. + rewrite (Nat2Z.inj_succ (tail031_alt n (shiftr x))), Z.pow_succ_r; auto with zarith. destruct (IHn (shiftr x)) as (y & Hy1 & Hy2). rewrite phi_nz; rewrite phi_nz in H; contradict H. @@ -1861,13 +1858,13 @@ Section Int31_Specs. exists y; split; auto. rewrite phi_eqn1; auto. - rewrite Zdouble_mult, Hy2; ring. + rewrite Z.double_spec, Hy2; ring. exists [|shiftr x|]. split. generalize (phi_bounded (shiftr x)); auto with zarith. rewrite phi_eqn2; auto. - rewrite Zdouble_plus_one_mult; simpl; ring. + rewrite Z.succ_double_spec; simpl; ring. Qed. (* Sqrt *) @@ -1886,30 +1883,30 @@ Section Int31_Specs. Proof. intros Hj; generalize Hj k; pattern j; apply natlike_ind; auto; clear k j Hj. - intros _ k Hk; repeat rewrite Zplus_0_l. - apply Zmult_le_0_compat; generalize (Z_div_pos k 2); auto with zarith. + intros _ k Hk; repeat rewrite Z.add_0_l. + apply Z.mul_nonneg_nonneg; generalize (Z_div_pos k 2); auto with zarith. intros j Hj Hrec _ k Hk; pattern k; apply natlike_ind; auto; clear k Hk. - rewrite Zmult_0_r, Zplus_0_r, Zplus_0_l. - generalize (sqr_pos (Zsucc j / 2)) (quotient_by_2 (Zsucc j)); - unfold Zsucc. - rewrite Zpower_2, Zmult_plus_distr_l; repeat rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_r. + rewrite Z.mul_0_r, Z.add_0_r, Z.add_0_l. + generalize (sqr_pos (Z.succ j / 2)) (quotient_by_2 (Z.succ j)); + unfold Z.succ. + rewrite Z.pow_2_r, Z.mul_add_distr_r; repeat rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_l. auto with zarith. intros k Hk _. - replace ((Zsucc j + Zsucc k) / 2) with ((j + k)/2 + 1). + replace ((Z.succ j + Z.succ k) / 2) with ((j + k)/2 + 1). generalize (Hrec Hj k Hk) (quotient_by_2 (j + k)). - unfold Zsucc; repeat rewrite Zpower_2; - repeat rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_l; repeat rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_r. - repeat rewrite Zmult_1_l; repeat rewrite Zmult_1_r. + unfold Z.succ; repeat rewrite Z.pow_2_r; + repeat rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_r; repeat rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_l. + repeat rewrite Z.mul_1_l; repeat rewrite Z.mul_1_r. auto with zarith. - rewrite Zplus_comm, <- Z_div_plus_full_l; auto with zarith. - apply f_equal2 with (f := Zdiv); auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.add_comm, <- Z_div_plus_full_l; auto with zarith. + apply f_equal2 with (f := Z.div); auto with zarith. Qed. Lemma sqrt_main i j: 0 <= i -> 0 < j -> i < ((j + (i/j))/2 + 1) ^ 2. Proof. intros Hi Hj. assert (Hij: 0 <= i/j) by (apply Z_div_pos; auto with zarith). - apply Zlt_le_trans with (2 := sqrt_main_trick _ _ (Zlt_le_weak _ _ Hj) Hij). + apply Z.lt_le_trans with (2 := sqrt_main_trick _ _ (Z.lt_le_incl _ _ Hj) Hij). pattern i at 1; rewrite (Z_div_mod_eq i j); case (Z_mod_lt i j); auto with zarith. Qed. @@ -1919,48 +1916,34 @@ Section Int31_Specs. assert (H1: 0 <= i - 2) by auto with zarith. assert (H2: 1 <= (i / 2) ^ 2); auto with zarith. replace i with (1* 2 + (i - 2)); auto with zarith. - rewrite Zpower_2, Z_div_plus_full_l; auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.pow_2_r, Z_div_plus_full_l; auto with zarith. generalize (sqr_pos ((i - 2)/ 2)) (Z_div_pos (i - 2) 2). - rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_l; repeat rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_r. + rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_r; repeat rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_l. auto with zarith. generalize (quotient_by_2 i). - rewrite Zpower_2 in H2 |- *; - repeat (rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_l || - rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_r || - rewrite Zmult_1_l || rewrite Zmult_1_r). + rewrite Z.pow_2_r in H2 |- *; + repeat (rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_r || + rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_l || + rewrite Z.mul_1_l || rewrite Z.mul_1_r). auto with zarith. Qed. Lemma sqrt_test_true i j: 0 <= i -> 0 < j -> i/j >= j -> j ^ 2 <= i. Proof. - intros Hi Hj Hd; rewrite Zpower_2. - apply Zle_trans with (j * (i/j)); auto with zarith. + intros Hi Hj Hd; rewrite Z.pow_2_r. + apply Z.le_trans with (j * (i/j)); auto with zarith. apply Z_mult_div_ge; auto with zarith. Qed. Lemma sqrt_test_false i j: 0 <= i -> 0 < j -> i/j < j -> (j + (i/j))/2 < j. Proof. - intros Hi Hj H; case (Zle_or_lt j ((j + (i/j))/2)); auto. - intros H1; contradict H; apply Zle_not_lt. + intros Hi Hj H; case (Z.le_gt_cases j ((j + (i/j))/2)); auto. + intros H1; contradict H; apply Z.le_ngt. assert (2 * j <= j + (i/j)); auto with zarith. - apply Zle_trans with (2 * ((j + (i/j))/2)); auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_trans with (2 * ((j + (i/j))/2)); auto with zarith. apply Z_mult_div_ge; auto with zarith. Qed. - (* George's trick *) - Inductive ZcompareSpec (i j: Z): comparison -> Prop := - ZcompareSpecEq: i = j -> ZcompareSpec i j Eq - | ZcompareSpecLt: i < j -> ZcompareSpec i j Lt - | ZcompareSpecGt: j < i -> ZcompareSpec i j Gt. - - Lemma Zcompare_spec i j: ZcompareSpec i j (i ?= j). - Proof. - case_eq (Zcompare i j); intros H. - apply ZcompareSpecEq; apply Zcompare_Eq_eq; auto. - apply ZcompareSpecLt; auto. - apply ZcompareSpecGt; apply Zgt_lt; auto. - Qed. - Lemma sqrt31_step_def rec i j: sqrt31_step rec i j = match (fst (i/j) ?= j)%int31 with @@ -1987,65 +1970,66 @@ Section Int31_Specs. [|rec i j1|] ^ 2 <= [|i|] < ([|rec i j1|] + 1) ^ 2) -> [|sqrt31_step rec i j|] ^ 2 <= [|i|] < ([|sqrt31_step rec i j|] + 1) ^ 2. Proof. - assert (Hp2: 0 < [|2|]) by exact (refl_equal Lt). + assert (Hp2: 0 < [|2|]) by exact (eq_refl Lt). intros Hi Hj Hij H31 Hrec; rewrite sqrt31_step_def. rewrite spec_compare, div31_phi; auto. - case Zcompare_spec; auto; intros Hc; + case Z.compare_spec; auto; intros Hc; try (split; auto; apply sqrt_test_true; auto with zarith; fail). apply Hrec; repeat rewrite div31_phi; auto with zarith. replace [|(j + fst (i / j)%int31)|] with ([|j|] + [|i|] / [|j|]). split. - case (Zle_lt_or_eq 1 [|j|]); auto with zarith; intros Hj1. + apply Z.le_succ_l in Hj. change (1 <= [|j|]) in Hj. + Z.le_elim Hj. replace ([|j|] + [|i|]/[|j|]) with (1 * 2 + (([|j|] - 2) + [|i|] / [|j|])); try ring. rewrite Z_div_plus_full_l; auto with zarith. assert (0 <= [|i|]/ [|j|]) by (apply Z_div_pos; auto with zarith). assert (0 <= ([|j|] - 2 + [|i|] / [|j|]) / [|2|]) ; auto with zarith. - rewrite <- Hj1, Zdiv_1_r. + rewrite <- Hj, Zdiv_1_r. replace (1 + [|i|])%Z with (1 * 2 + ([|i|] - 1))%Z; try ring. rewrite Z_div_plus_full_l; auto with zarith. assert (0 <= ([|i|] - 1) /2)%Z by (apply Z_div_pos; auto with zarith). change ([|2|]) with 2%Z; auto with zarith. apply sqrt_test_false; auto with zarith. rewrite spec_add, div31_phi; auto. - apply sym_equal; apply Zmod_small. + symmetry; apply Zmod_small. split; auto with zarith. replace [|j + fst (i / j)%int31|] with ([|j|] + [|i|] / [|j|]). apply sqrt_main; auto with zarith. rewrite spec_add, div31_phi; auto. - apply sym_equal; apply Zmod_small. + symmetry; apply Zmod_small. split; auto with zarith. Qed. Lemma iter31_sqrt_correct n rec i j: 0 < [|i|] -> 0 < [|j|] -> - [|i|] < ([|j|] + 1) ^ 2 -> 2 * [|j|] < 2 ^ (Z_of_nat size) -> - (forall j1, 0 < [|j1|] -> 2^(Z_of_nat n) + [|j1|] <= [|j|] -> - [|i|] < ([|j1|] + 1) ^ 2 -> 2 * [|j1|] < 2 ^ (Z_of_nat size) -> + [|i|] < ([|j|] + 1) ^ 2 -> 2 * [|j|] < 2 ^ (Z.of_nat size) -> + (forall j1, 0 < [|j1|] -> 2^(Z.of_nat n) + [|j1|] <= [|j|] -> + [|i|] < ([|j1|] + 1) ^ 2 -> 2 * [|j1|] < 2 ^ (Z.of_nat size) -> [|rec i j1|] ^ 2 <= [|i|] < ([|rec i j1|] + 1) ^ 2) -> [|iter31_sqrt n rec i j|] ^ 2 <= [|i|] < ([|iter31_sqrt n rec i j|] + 1) ^ 2. Proof. revert rec i j; elim n; unfold iter31_sqrt; fold iter31_sqrt; clear n. intros rec i j Hi Hj Hij H31 Hrec; apply sqrt31_step_correct; auto with zarith. intros; apply Hrec; auto with zarith. - rewrite Zpower_0_r; auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.pow_0_r; auto with zarith. intros n Hrec rec i j Hi Hj Hij H31 HHrec. apply sqrt31_step_correct; auto. intros j1 Hj1 Hjp1; apply Hrec; auto with zarith. intros j2 Hj2 H2j2 Hjp2 Hj31; apply Hrec; auto with zarith. intros j3 Hj3 Hpj3. apply HHrec; auto. - rewrite inj_S, Zpower_Zsucc. - apply Zle_trans with (2 ^Z_of_nat n + [|j2|]); auto with zarith. - apply Zle_0_nat. + rewrite Nat2Z.inj_succ, Z.pow_succ_r. + apply Z.le_trans with (2 ^Z.of_nat n + [|j2|]); auto with zarith. + apply Nat2Z.is_nonneg. Qed. Lemma spec_sqrt : forall x, [|sqrt31 x|] ^ 2 <= [|x|] < ([|sqrt31 x|] + 1) ^ 2. Proof. intros i; unfold sqrt31. - rewrite spec_compare. case Zcompare_spec; change [|1|] with 1; + rewrite spec_compare. case Z.compare_spec; change [|1|] with 1; intros Hi; auto with zarith. - repeat rewrite Zpower_2; auto with zarith. + repeat rewrite Z.pow_2_r; auto with zarith. apply iter31_sqrt_correct; auto with zarith. rewrite div31_phi; change ([|2|]) with 2; auto with zarith. replace ([|i|]) with (1 * 2 + ([|i|] - 2))%Z; try ring. @@ -2054,18 +2038,18 @@ Section Int31_Specs. rewrite div31_phi; change ([|2|]) with 2; auto with zarith. apply sqrt_init; auto. rewrite div31_phi; change ([|2|]) with 2; auto with zarith. - apply Zle_lt_trans with ([|i|]). + apply Z.le_lt_trans with ([|i|]). apply Z_mult_div_ge; auto with zarith. case (phi_bounded i); auto. - intros j2 H1 H2; contradict H2; apply Zlt_not_le. + intros j2 H1 H2; contradict H2; apply Z.lt_nge. rewrite div31_phi; change ([|2|]) with 2; auto with zarith. - apply Zle_lt_trans with ([|i|]); auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_lt_trans with ([|i|]); auto with zarith. assert (0 <= [|i|]/2)%Z by (apply Z_div_pos; auto with zarith). - apply Zle_trans with (2 * ([|i|]/2)); auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_trans with (2 * ([|i|]/2)); auto with zarith. apply Z_mult_div_ge; auto with zarith. case (phi_bounded i); unfold size; auto with zarith. change [|0|] with 0; auto with zarith. - case (phi_bounded i); repeat rewrite Zpower_2; auto with zarith. + case (phi_bounded i); repeat rewrite Z.pow_2_r; auto with zarith. Qed. Lemma sqrt312_step_def rec ih il j: @@ -2095,10 +2079,10 @@ Section Int31_Specs. case (phi_bounded il); intros Hbil _. case (phi_bounded ih); intros Hbih Hbih1. assert (([|ih|] < [|j|] + 1)%Z); auto with zarith. - apply Zlt_square_simpl; auto with zarith. - repeat rewrite <-Zpower_2; apply Zle_lt_trans with (2 := H1). - apply Zle_trans with ([|ih|] * base)%Z; unfold phi2, base; - try rewrite Zpower_2; auto with zarith. + apply Z.square_lt_simpl_nonneg; auto with zarith. + repeat rewrite <-Z.pow_2_r; apply Z.le_lt_trans with (2 := H1). + apply Z.le_trans with ([|ih|] * base)%Z; unfold phi2, base; + try rewrite Z.pow_2_r; auto with zarith. Qed. Lemma div312_phi ih il j: (2^30 <= [|j|] -> [|ih|] < [|j|] -> @@ -2108,7 +2092,7 @@ Section Int31_Specs. generalize (spec_div21 ih il j Hj Hj1). case div3121; intros q r (Hq, Hr). apply Zdiv_unique with (phi r); auto with zarith. - simpl fst; apply trans_equal with (1 := Hq); ring. + simpl fst; apply eq_trans with (1 := Hq); ring. Qed. Lemma sqrt312_step_correct rec ih il j: @@ -2118,32 +2102,33 @@ Section Int31_Specs. [|sqrt312_step rec ih il j|] ^ 2 <= phi2 ih il < ([|sqrt312_step rec ih il j|] + 1) ^ 2. Proof. - assert (Hp2: (0 < [|2|])%Z) by exact (refl_equal Lt). + assert (Hp2: (0 < [|2|])%Z) by exact (eq_refl Lt). intros Hih Hj Hij Hrec; rewrite sqrt312_step_def. assert (H1: ([|ih|] <= [|j|])%Z) by (apply sqrt312_lower_bound with il; auto). case (phi_bounded ih); intros Hih1 _. case (phi_bounded il); intros Hil1 _. case (phi_bounded j); intros _ Hj1. assert (Hp3: (0 < phi2 ih il)). - unfold phi2; apply Zlt_le_trans with ([|ih|] * base)%Z; auto with zarith. - apply Zmult_lt_0_compat; auto with zarith. - apply Zlt_le_trans with (2:= Hih); auto with zarith. - rewrite spec_compare. case Zcompare_spec; intros Hc1. + unfold phi2; apply Z.lt_le_trans with ([|ih|] * base)%Z; auto with zarith. + apply Z.mul_pos_pos; auto with zarith. + apply Z.lt_le_trans with (2:= Hih); auto with zarith. + rewrite spec_compare. case Z.compare_spec; intros Hc1. split; auto. apply sqrt_test_true; auto. unfold phi2, base; auto with zarith. unfold phi2; rewrite Hc1. assert (0 <= [|il|]/[|j|]) by (apply Z_div_pos; auto with zarith). - rewrite Zmult_comm, Z_div_plus_full_l; unfold base; auto with zarith. - unfold Zpower, Zpower_pos in Hj1; simpl in Hj1; auto with zarith. - case (Zle_or_lt (2 ^ 30) [|j|]); intros Hjj. - rewrite spec_compare; case Zcompare_spec; + rewrite Z.mul_comm, Z_div_plus_full_l; unfold base; auto with zarith. + unfold Z.pow, Z.pow_pos in Hj1; simpl in Hj1; auto with zarith. + case (Z.le_gt_cases (2 ^ 30) [|j|]); intros Hjj. + rewrite spec_compare; case Z.compare_spec; rewrite div312_phi; auto; intros Hc; try (split; auto; apply sqrt_test_true; auto with zarith; fail). apply Hrec. assert (Hf1: 0 <= phi2 ih il/ [|j|]) by (apply Z_div_pos; auto with zarith). - case (Zle_lt_or_eq 1 ([|j|])); auto with zarith; intros Hf2. - 2: contradict Hc; apply Zle_not_lt; rewrite <- Hf2, Zdiv_1_r; auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_succ_l in Hj. change (1 <= [|j|]) in Hj. + Z.le_elim Hj. + 2: contradict Hc; apply Z.le_ngt; rewrite <- Hj, Zdiv_1_r; auto with zarith. assert (Hf3: 0 < ([|j|] + phi2 ih il / [|j|]) / 2). replace ([|j|] + phi2 ih il/ [|j|])%Z with (1 * 2 + (([|j|] - 2) + phi2 ih il / [|j|])); try ring. @@ -2157,9 +2142,9 @@ Section Int31_Specs. rewrite div31_phi; change [|2|] with 2%Z; auto with zarith. intros HH; rewrite HH; clear HH; auto with zarith. rewrite spec_add, div31_phi; change [|2|] with 2%Z; auto. - rewrite Zmult_1_l; intros HH. - rewrite Zplus_comm, <- Z_div_plus_full_l; auto with zarith. - change (phi v30 * 2) with (2 ^ Z_of_nat size). + rewrite Z.mul_1_l; intros HH. + rewrite Z.add_comm, <- Z_div_plus_full_l; auto with zarith. + change (phi v30 * 2) with (2 ^ Z.of_nat size). rewrite HH, Zmod_small; auto with zarith. replace (phi match j +c fst (div3121 ih il j) with @@ -2173,41 +2158,41 @@ Section Int31_Specs. rewrite div31_phi; auto with zarith. intros HH; rewrite HH; auto with zarith. intros HH; rewrite <- HH. - change (1 * 2 ^ Z_of_nat size) with (phi (v30) * 2). + change (1 * 2 ^ Z.of_nat size) with (phi (v30) * 2). rewrite Z_div_plus_full_l; auto with zarith. - rewrite Zplus_comm. + rewrite Z.add_comm. rewrite spec_add, Zmod_small. rewrite div31_phi; auto. split; auto with zarith. case (phi_bounded (fst (r/2)%int31)); case (phi_bounded v30); auto with zarith. rewrite div31_phi; change (phi 2) with 2%Z; auto. - change (2 ^Z_of_nat size) with (base/2 + phi v30). + change (2 ^Z.of_nat size) with (base/2 + phi v30). assert (phi r / 2 < base/2); auto with zarith. - apply Zmult_gt_0_lt_reg_r with 2; auto with zarith. + apply Z.mul_lt_mono_pos_r with 2; auto with zarith. change (base/2 * 2) with base. - apply Zle_lt_trans with (phi r). - rewrite Zmult_comm; apply Z_mult_div_ge; auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_lt_trans with (phi r). + rewrite Z.mul_comm; apply Z_mult_div_ge; auto with zarith. case (phi_bounded r); auto with zarith. - contradict Hij; apply Zle_not_lt. + contradict Hij; apply Z.le_ngt. assert ((1 + [|j|]) <= 2 ^ 30); auto with zarith. - apply Zle_trans with ((2 ^ 30) * (2 ^ 30)); auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_trans with ((2 ^ 30) * (2 ^ 30)); auto with zarith. assert (0 <= 1 + [|j|]); auto with zarith. - apply Zmult_le_compat; auto with zarith. + apply Z.mul_le_mono_nonneg; auto with zarith. change ((2 ^ 30) * (2 ^ 30)) with ((2 ^ 29) * base). - apply Zle_trans with ([|ih|] * base); auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_trans with ([|ih|] * base); auto with zarith. unfold phi2, base; auto with zarith. split; auto. apply sqrt_test_true; auto. unfold phi2, base; auto with zarith. - apply Zle_ge; apply Zle_trans with (([|j|] * base)/[|j|]). - rewrite Zmult_comm, Z_div_mult; auto with zarith. - apply Zge_le; apply Z_div_ge; auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_ge; apply Z.le_trans with (([|j|] * base)/[|j|]). + rewrite Z.mul_comm, Z_div_mult; auto with zarith. + apply Z.ge_le; apply Z_div_ge; auto with zarith. Qed. Lemma iter312_sqrt_correct n rec ih il j: 2^29 <= [|ih|] -> 0 < [|j|] -> phi2 ih il < ([|j|] + 1) ^ 2 -> - (forall j1, 0 < [|j1|] -> 2^(Z_of_nat n) + [|j1|] <= [|j|] -> + (forall j1, 0 < [|j1|] -> 2^(Z.of_nat n) + [|j1|] <= [|j|] -> phi2 ih il < ([|j1|] + 1) ^ 2 -> [|rec ih il j1|] ^ 2 <= phi2 ih il < ([|rec ih il j1|] + 1) ^ 2) -> [|iter312_sqrt n rec ih il j|] ^ 2 <= phi2 ih il @@ -2216,16 +2201,16 @@ Section Int31_Specs. revert rec ih il j; elim n; unfold iter312_sqrt; fold iter312_sqrt; clear n. intros rec ih il j Hi Hj Hij Hrec; apply sqrt312_step_correct; auto with zarith. intros; apply Hrec; auto with zarith. - rewrite Zpower_0_r; auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.pow_0_r; auto with zarith. intros n Hrec rec ih il j Hi Hj Hij HHrec. apply sqrt312_step_correct; auto. intros j1 Hj1 Hjp1; apply Hrec; auto with zarith. intros j2 Hj2 H2j2 Hjp2; apply Hrec; auto with zarith. intros j3 Hj3 Hpj3. apply HHrec; auto. - rewrite inj_S, Zpower_Zsucc. - apply Zle_trans with (2 ^Z_of_nat n + [|j2|])%Z; auto with zarith. - apply Zle_0_nat. + rewrite Nat2Z.inj_succ, Z.pow_succ_r. + apply Z.le_trans with (2 ^Z.of_nat n + [|j2|])%Z; auto with zarith. + apply Nat2Z.is_nonneg. Qed. Lemma spec_sqrt2 : forall x y, @@ -2240,30 +2225,30 @@ Section Int31_Specs. (intros s; ring). assert (Hb: 0 <= base) by (red; intros HH; discriminate). assert (Hi2: phi2 ih il < (phi Tn + 1) ^ 2). - change ((phi Tn + 1) ^ 2) with (2^62). - apply Zle_lt_trans with ((2^31 -1) * base + (2^31 - 1)); auto with zarith. - 2: simpl; unfold Zpower_pos; simpl; auto with zarith. - case (phi_bounded ih); case (phi_bounded il); intros H1 H2 H3 H4. - unfold base, Zpower, Zpower_pos in H2,H4; simpl in H2,H4. - unfold phi2,Zpower, Zpower_pos. simpl Pos.iter; auto with zarith. + { change ((phi Tn + 1) ^ 2) with (2^62). + apply Z.le_lt_trans with ((2^31 -1) * base + (2^31 - 1)); auto with zarith. + 2: simpl; unfold Z.pow_pos; simpl; auto with zarith. + case (phi_bounded ih); case (phi_bounded il); intros H1 H2 H3 H4. + unfold base, Z.pow, Z.pow_pos in H2,H4; simpl in H2,H4. + unfold phi2,Z.pow, Z.pow_pos. simpl Pos.iter; auto with zarith. } case (iter312_sqrt_correct 31 (fun _ _ j => j) ih il Tn); auto with zarith. change [|Tn|] with 2147483647; auto with zarith. intros j1 _ HH; contradict HH. - apply Zlt_not_le. + apply Z.lt_nge. change [|Tn|] with 2147483647; auto with zarith. - change (2 ^ Z_of_nat 31) with 2147483648; auto with zarith. + change (2 ^ Z.of_nat 31) with 2147483648; auto with zarith. case (phi_bounded j1); auto with zarith. set (s := iter312_sqrt 31 (fun _ _ j : int31 => j) ih il Tn). intros Hs1 Hs2. generalize (spec_mul_c s s); case mul31c. simpl zn2z_to_Z; intros HH. assert ([|s|] = 0). - case (Zmult_integral _ _ (sym_equal HH)); auto. - contradict Hs2; apply Zle_not_lt; rewrite H. + { symmetry in HH. rewrite Z.mul_eq_0 in HH. destruct HH; auto. } + contradict Hs2; apply Z.le_ngt; rewrite H. change ((0 + 1) ^ 2) with 1. - apply Zle_trans with (2 ^ Z_of_nat size / 4 * base). + apply Z.le_trans with (2 ^ Z.of_nat size / 4 * base). simpl; auto with zarith. - apply Zle_trans with ([|ih|] * base); auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_trans with ([|ih|] * base); auto with zarith. unfold phi2; case (phi_bounded il); auto with zarith. intros ih1 il1. change [||WW ih1 il1||] with (phi2 ih1 il1). @@ -2271,10 +2256,10 @@ Section Int31_Specs. generalize (spec_sub_c il il1). case sub31c; intros il2 Hil2. simpl interp_carry in Hil2. - rewrite spec_compare; case Zcompare_spec. + rewrite spec_compare; case Z.compare_spec. unfold interp_carry. intros H1; split. - rewrite Zpower_2, <- Hihl1. + rewrite Z.pow_2_r, <- Hihl1. unfold phi2; ring[Hil2 H1]. replace [|il2|] with (phi2 ih il - phi2 ih1 il1). rewrite Hihl1. @@ -2282,109 +2267,111 @@ Section Int31_Specs. unfold phi2; rewrite H1, Hil2; ring. unfold interp_carry. intros H1; contradict Hs1. - apply Zlt_not_le; rewrite Zpower_2, <-Hihl1. + apply Z.lt_nge; rewrite Z.pow_2_r, <-Hihl1. unfold phi2. case (phi_bounded il); intros _ H2. - apply Zlt_le_trans with (([|ih|] + 1) * base + 0). - rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_l, Zplus_0_r; auto with zarith. + apply Z.lt_le_trans with (([|ih|] + 1) * base + 0). + rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_r, Z.add_0_r; auto with zarith. case (phi_bounded il1); intros H3 _. - apply Zplus_le_compat; auto with zarith. - unfold interp_carry; change (1 * 2 ^ Z_of_nat size) with base. - rewrite Zpower_2, <- Hihl1, Hil2. + apply Z.add_le_mono; auto with zarith. + unfold interp_carry; change (1 * 2 ^ Z.of_nat size) with base. + rewrite Z.pow_2_r, <- Hihl1, Hil2. intros H1. - case (Zle_lt_or_eq ([|ih1|] + 1) ([|ih|])); auto with zarith. - intros H2; contradict Hs2; apply Zle_not_lt. + rewrite <- Z.le_succ_l, <- Z.add_1_r in H1. + Z.le_elim H1. + contradict Hs2; apply Z.le_ngt. replace (([|s|] + 1) ^ 2) with (phi2 ih1 il1 + 2 * [|s|] + 1). unfold phi2. case (phi_bounded il); intros Hpil _. assert (Hl1l: [|il1|] <= [|il|]). - case (phi_bounded il2); rewrite Hil2; auto with zarith. + { case (phi_bounded il2); rewrite Hil2; auto with zarith. } assert ([|ih1|] * base + 2 * [|s|] + 1 <= [|ih|] * base); auto with zarith. - case (phi_bounded s); change (2 ^ Z_of_nat size) with base; intros _ Hps. + case (phi_bounded s); change (2 ^ Z.of_nat size) with base; intros _ Hps. case (phi_bounded ih1); intros Hpih1 _; auto with zarith. - apply Zle_trans with (([|ih1|] + 2) * base); auto with zarith. - rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_l. + apply Z.le_trans with (([|ih1|] + 2) * base); auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_r. assert (2 * [|s|] + 1 <= 2 * base); auto with zarith. rewrite Hihl1, Hbin; auto. - intros H2; split. - unfold phi2; rewrite <- H2; ring. + split. + unfold phi2; rewrite <- H1; ring. replace (base + ([|il|] - [|il1|])) with (phi2 ih il - ([|s|] * [|s|])). rewrite <-Hbin in Hs2; auto with zarith. - rewrite <- Hihl1; unfold phi2; rewrite <- H2; ring. + rewrite <- Hihl1; unfold phi2; rewrite <- H1; ring. unfold interp_carry in Hil2 |- *. - unfold interp_carry; change (1 * 2 ^ Z_of_nat size) with base. + unfold interp_carry; change (1 * 2 ^ Z.of_nat size) with base. assert (Hsih: [|ih - 1|] = [|ih|] - 1). - rewrite spec_sub, Zmod_small; auto; change [|1|] with 1. - case (phi_bounded ih); intros H1 H2. - generalize Hih; change (2 ^ Z_of_nat size / 4) with 536870912. - split; auto with zarith. - rewrite spec_compare; case Zcompare_spec. + { rewrite spec_sub, Zmod_small; auto; change [|1|] with 1. + case (phi_bounded ih); intros H1 H2. + generalize Hih; change (2 ^ Z.of_nat size / 4) with 536870912. + split; auto with zarith. } + rewrite spec_compare; case Z.compare_spec. rewrite Hsih. intros H1; split. - rewrite Zpower_2, <- Hihl1. + rewrite Z.pow_2_r, <- Hihl1. unfold phi2; rewrite <-H1. - apply trans_equal with ([|ih|] * base + [|il1|] + ([|il|] - [|il1|])). + transitivity ([|ih|] * base + [|il1|] + ([|il|] - [|il1|])). ring. rewrite <-Hil2. - change (2 ^ Z_of_nat size) with base; ring. + change (2 ^ Z.of_nat size) with base; ring. replace [|il2|] with (phi2 ih il - phi2 ih1 il1). rewrite Hihl1. rewrite <-Hbin in Hs2; auto with zarith. unfold phi2. rewrite <-H1. ring_simplify. - apply trans_equal with (base + ([|il|] - [|il1|])). + transitivity (base + ([|il|] - [|il1|])). ring. rewrite <-Hil2. - change (2 ^ Z_of_nat size) with base; ring. + change (2 ^ Z.of_nat size) with base; ring. rewrite Hsih; intros H1. assert (He: [|ih|] = [|ih1|]). - apply Zle_antisym; auto with zarith. - case (Zle_or_lt [|ih1|] [|ih|]); auto; intros H2. - contradict Hs1; apply Zlt_not_le; rewrite Zpower_2, <-Hihl1. - unfold phi2. - case (phi_bounded il); change (2 ^ Z_of_nat size) with base; + { apply Z.le_antisymm; auto with zarith. + case (Z.le_gt_cases [|ih1|] [|ih|]); auto; intros H2. + contradict Hs1; apply Z.lt_nge; rewrite Z.pow_2_r, <-Hihl1. + unfold phi2. + case (phi_bounded il); change (2 ^ Z.of_nat size) with base; intros _ Hpil1. - apply Zlt_le_trans with (([|ih|] + 1) * base). - rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_l, Zmult_1_l; auto with zarith. - case (phi_bounded il1); intros Hpil2 _. - apply Zle_trans with (([|ih1|]) * base); auto with zarith. - rewrite Zpower_2, <-Hihl1; unfold phi2; rewrite <-He. - contradict Hs1; apply Zlt_not_le; rewrite Zpower_2, <-Hihl1. + apply Z.lt_le_trans with (([|ih|] + 1) * base). + rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_r, Z.mul_1_l; auto with zarith. + case (phi_bounded il1); intros Hpil2 _. + apply Z.le_trans with (([|ih1|]) * base); auto with zarith. } + rewrite Z.pow_2_r, <-Hihl1; unfold phi2; rewrite <-He. + contradict Hs1; apply Z.lt_nge; rewrite Z.pow_2_r, <-Hihl1. unfold phi2; rewrite He. assert (phi il - phi il1 < 0); auto with zarith. rewrite <-Hil2. case (phi_bounded il2); auto with zarith. intros H1. - rewrite Zpower_2, <-Hihl1. - case (Zle_lt_or_eq ([|ih1|] + 2) [|ih|]); auto with zarith. - intros H2; contradict Hs2; apply Zle_not_lt. + rewrite Z.pow_2_r, <-Hihl1. + assert (H2 : [|ih1|]+2 <= [|ih|]); auto with zarith. + Z.le_elim H2. + contradict Hs2; apply Z.le_ngt. replace (([|s|] + 1) ^ 2) with (phi2 ih1 il1 + 2 * [|s|] + 1). unfold phi2. assert ([|ih1|] * base + 2 * phi s + 1 <= [|ih|] * base + ([|il|] - [|il1|])); auto with zarith. rewrite <-Hil2. - change (-1 * 2 ^ Z_of_nat size) with (-base). + change (-1 * 2 ^ Z.of_nat size) with (-base). case (phi_bounded il2); intros Hpil2 _. - apply Zle_trans with ([|ih|] * base + - base); auto with zarith. - case (phi_bounded s); change (2 ^ Z_of_nat size) with base; intros _ Hps. + apply Z.le_trans with ([|ih|] * base + - base); auto with zarith. + case (phi_bounded s); change (2 ^ Z.of_nat size) with base; intros _ Hps. assert (2 * [|s|] + 1 <= 2 * base); auto with zarith. - apply Zle_trans with ([|ih1|] * base + 2 * base); auto with zarith. + apply Z.le_trans with ([|ih1|] * base + 2 * base); auto with zarith. assert (Hi: ([|ih1|] + 3) * base <= [|ih|] * base); auto with zarith. - rewrite Zmult_plus_distr_l in Hi; auto with zarith. + rewrite Z.mul_add_distr_r in Hi; auto with zarith. rewrite Hihl1, Hbin; auto. - intros H2; unfold phi2; rewrite <-H2. + unfold phi2; rewrite <-H2. split. replace [|il|] with (([|il|] - [|il1|]) + [|il1|]); try ring. rewrite <-Hil2. - change (-1 * 2 ^ Z_of_nat size) with (-base); ring. + change (-1 * 2 ^ Z.of_nat size) with (-base); ring. replace (base + [|il2|]) with (phi2 ih il - phi2 ih1 il1). rewrite Hihl1. rewrite <-Hbin in Hs2; auto with zarith. unfold phi2; rewrite <-H2. replace [|il|] with (([|il|] - [|il1|]) + [|il1|]); try ring. rewrite <-Hil2. - change (-1 * 2 ^ Z_of_nat size) with (-base); ring. + change (-1 * 2 ^ Z.of_nat size) with (-base); ring. Qed. (** [iszero] *) @@ -2394,7 +2381,7 @@ Qed. clear; unfold ZnZ.eq0; simpl. unfold compare31; simpl; intros. change [|0|] with 0 in H. - apply Zcompare_Eq_eq. + apply Z.compare_eq. now destruct ([|x|] ?= 0). Qed. @@ -2412,7 +2399,7 @@ Qed. destruct H; auto with zarith. replace ([|x|] mod 2) with [|r|]. destruct H; auto with zarith. - case Zcompare_spec; auto with zarith. + case Z.compare_spec; auto with zarith. apply Zmod_unique with [|q|]; auto with zarith. Qed. |