diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test-suite/success/RecTutorial.v')
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/success/RecTutorial.v | 208 |
1 files changed, 103 insertions, 105 deletions
diff --git a/test-suite/success/RecTutorial.v b/test-suite/success/RecTutorial.v index 60e170e4..d4e6a82e 100644 --- a/test-suite/success/RecTutorial.v +++ b/test-suite/success/RecTutorial.v @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -Inductive nat : Set := - | O : nat +Inductive nat : Set := + | O : nat | S : nat->nat. Check nat. Check O. @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ Print le. Theorem zero_leq_three: 0 <= 3. Proof. - constructor 2. - constructor 2. + constructor 2. + constructor 2. constructor 2. constructor 1. @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Qed. Lemma zero_lt_three : 0 < 3. Proof. unfold lt. - repeat constructor. + repeat constructor. Qed. @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ Require Import Compare_dec. Check le_lt_dec. -Definition max (n p :nat) := match le_lt_dec n p with +Definition max (n p :nat) := match le_lt_dec n p with | left _ => p | right _ => n end. @@ -152,9 +152,9 @@ Extraction max. Inductive tree(A:Set) : Set := - node : A -> forest A -> tree A + node : A -> forest A -> tree A with - forest (A: Set) : Set := + forest (A: Set) : Set := nochild : forest A | addchild : tree A -> forest A -> forest A. @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ with -Inductive +Inductive even : nat->Prop := evenO : even O | evenS : forall n, odd n -> even (S n) @@ -176,11 +176,11 @@ Qed. -Definition nat_case := +Definition nat_case := fun (Q : Type)(g0 : Q)(g1 : nat -> Q)(n:nat) => match n return Q with - | 0 => g0 - | S p => g1 p + | 0 => g0 + | S p => g1 p end. Eval simpl in (nat_case nat 0 (fun p => p) 34). @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ Eval simpl in fun p => pred (S p). Definition xorb (b1 b2:bool) := -match b1, b2 with +match b1, b2 with | false, true => true | true, false => true | _ , _ => false @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ end. Definition pred_spec (n:nat) := {m:nat | n=0 /\ m=0 \/ n = S m}. - + Definition predecessor : forall n:nat, pred_spec n. intro n;case n. @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ Print predecessor. Extraction predecessor. -Theorem nat_expand : +Theorem nat_expand : forall n:nat, n = match n with 0 => 0 | S p => S p end. intro n;case n;simpl;auto. Qed. @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ Qed. Check (fun p:False => match p return 2=3 with end). Theorem fromFalse : False -> 0=1. - intro absurd. + intro absurd. contradiction. Qed. @@ -244,12 +244,12 @@ Section equality_elimination. End equality_elimination. - + Theorem trans : forall n m p:nat, n=m -> m=p -> n=p. Proof. - intros n m p eqnm. + intros n m p eqnm. case eqnm. - trivial. + trivial. Qed. Lemma Rw : forall x y: nat, y = y * x -> y * x * x = y. @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ Lemma four_n : forall n:nat, n+n+n+n = 4*n. Undo. intro n; pattern n at 1. - + rewrite <- mult_1_l. repeat rewrite mult_distr_S. @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ Proof. intros m Hm; exists m;trivial. Qed. -Definition Vtail_total +Definition Vtail_total (A : Set) (n : nat) (v : vector A n) : vector A (pred n):= match v in (vector _ n0) return (vector A (pred n0)) with | Vnil => Vnil A @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ match v in (vector _ n0) return (vector A (pred n0)) with end. Definition Vtail' (A:Set)(n:nat)(v:vector A n) : vector A (pred n). - intros A n v; case v. + case v. simpl. exact (Vnil A). simpl. @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ Defined. (* Inductive Lambda : Set := - lambda : (Lambda -> False) -> Lambda. + lambda : (Lambda -> False) -> Lambda. Error: Non strictly positive occurrence of "Lambda" in @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ Section Paradox. (* understand matchL Q l (fun h : Lambda -> False => t) - as match l return Q with lambda h => t end + as match l return Q with lambda h => t end *) Definition application (f x: Lambda) :False := @@ -377,26 +377,26 @@ Definition isingle l := inode l (fun i => ileaf). Definition t1 := inode 0 (fun n => isingle (Z_of_nat (2*n))). -Definition t2 := inode 0 - (fun n : nat => +Definition t2 := inode 0 + (fun n : nat => inode (Z_of_nat n) (fun p => isingle (Z_of_nat (n*p)))). Inductive itree_le : itree-> itree -> Prop := | le_leaf : forall t, itree_le ileaf t - | le_node : forall l l' s s', - Zle l l' -> - (forall i, exists j:nat, itree_le (s i) (s' j)) -> + | le_node : forall l l' s s', + Zle l l' -> + (forall i, exists j:nat, itree_le (s i) (s' j)) -> itree_le (inode l s) (inode l' s'). -Theorem itree_le_trans : +Theorem itree_le_trans : forall t t', itree_le t t' -> forall t'', itree_le t' t'' -> itree_le t t''. induction t. constructor 1. - + intros t'; case t'. inversion 1. intros z0 i0 H0. @@ -409,20 +409,20 @@ Theorem itree_le_trans : inversion_clear H0. intro i2; case (H4 i2). intros. - generalize (H i2 _ H0). + generalize (H i2 _ H0). intros. case (H3 x);intros. generalize (H5 _ H6). exists x0;auto. Qed. - + Inductive itree_le' : itree-> itree -> Prop := | le_leaf' : forall t, itree_le' ileaf t - | le_node' : forall l l' s s' g, - Zle l l' -> - (forall i, itree_le' (s i) (s' (g i))) -> + | le_node' : forall l l' s s' g, + Zle l l' -> + (forall i, itree_le' (s i) (s' (g i))) -> itree_le' (inode l s) (inode l' s'). @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ Lemma t1_le_t2 : itree_le t1 t2. constructor. auto with zarith. intro i; exists (2 * i). - unfold isingle. + unfold isingle. constructor. auto with zarith. exists i;constructor. @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ Qed. Require Import List. -Inductive ltree (A:Set) : Set := +Inductive ltree (A:Set) : Set := lnode : A -> list (ltree A) -> ltree A. Inductive prop : Prop := @@ -482,8 +482,8 @@ Qed. Check (fun (P:Prop->Prop)(p: ex_Prop P) => match p with exP_intro X HX => X end). Error: -Incorrect elimination of "p" in the inductive type -"ex_Prop", the return type has sort "Type" while it should be +Incorrect elimination of "p" in the inductive type +"ex_Prop", the return type has sort "Type" while it should be "Prop" Elimination of an inductive object of sort "Prop" @@ -496,8 +496,8 @@ because proofs can be eliminated only to build proofs Check (match prop_inject with (prop_intro P p) => P end). Error: -Incorrect elimination of "prop_inject" in the inductive type -"prop", the return type has sort "Type" while it should be +Incorrect elimination of "prop_inject" in the inductive type +"prop", the return type has sort "Type" while it should be "Prop" Elimination of an inductive object of sort "Prop" @@ -508,17 +508,17 @@ because proofs can be eliminated only to build proofs Print prop_inject. (* -prop_inject = +prop_inject = prop_inject = prop_intro prop (fun H : prop => H) : prop *) -Inductive typ : Type := - typ_intro : Type -> typ. +Inductive typ : Type := + typ_intro : Type -> typ. Definition typ_inject: typ. -split. +split. exact typ. (* Defined. @@ -564,13 +564,13 @@ Reset comes_from_the_left. Definition comes_from_the_left (P Q:Prop)(H:P \/ Q): Prop := match H with - | or_introl p => True + | or_introl p => True | or_intror q => False end. Error: -Incorrect elimination of "H" in the inductive type -"or", the return type has sort "Type" while it should be +Incorrect elimination of "H" in the inductive type +"or", the return type has sort "Type" while it should be "Prop" Elimination of an inductive object of sort "Prop" @@ -582,41 +582,41 @@ because proofs can be eliminated only to build proofs Definition comes_from_the_left_sumbool (P Q:Prop)(x:{P}+{Q}): Prop := match x with - | left p => True + | left p => True | right q => False end. - + Close Scope Z_scope. -Theorem S_is_not_O : forall n, S n <> 0. +Theorem S_is_not_O : forall n, S n <> 0. -Definition Is_zero (x:nat):= match x with - | 0 => True +Definition Is_zero (x:nat):= match x with + | 0 => True | _ => False end. Lemma O_is_zero : forall m, m = 0 -> Is_zero m. Proof. intros m H; subst m. - (* + (* ============================ Is_zero 0 *) simpl;trivial. Qed. - + red; intros n Hn. apply O_is_zero with (m := S n). assumption. Qed. -Theorem disc2 : forall n, S (S n) <> 1. +Theorem disc2 : forall n, S (S n) <> 1. Proof. intros n Hn; discriminate. Qed. @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ Qed. Theorem inj_succ : forall n m, S n = S m -> n = m. Proof. - + Lemma inj_pred : forall n m, n = m -> pred n = pred m. Proof. @@ -666,9 +666,9 @@ Proof. intros n p H; case H ; intros; discriminate. Qed. - + eapply not_le_Sn_0_with_constraints; eauto. -Qed. +Qed. Theorem not_le_Sn_0' : forall n:nat, ~ (S n <= 0). @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ Check le_Sn_0_inv. Theorem le_Sn_0'' : forall n p : nat, ~ S n <= 0 . Proof. - intros n p H; + intros n p H; inversion H using le_Sn_0_inv. Qed. @@ -689,9 +689,9 @@ Derive Inversion_clear le_Sn_0_inv' with (forall n :nat, S n <= 0). Check le_Sn_0_inv'. -Theorem le_reverse_rules : - forall n m:nat, n <= m -> - n = m \/ +Theorem le_reverse_rules : + forall n m:nat, n <= m -> + n = m \/ exists p, n <= p /\ m = S p. Proof. intros n m H; inversion H. @@ -704,21 +704,21 @@ Restart. Qed. Inductive ArithExp : Set := - Zero : ArithExp + Zero : ArithExp | Succ : ArithExp -> ArithExp | Plus : ArithExp -> ArithExp -> ArithExp. Inductive RewriteRel : ArithExp -> ArithExp -> Prop := RewSucc : forall e1 e2 :ArithExp, - RewriteRel e1 e2 -> RewriteRel (Succ e1) (Succ e2) + RewriteRel e1 e2 -> RewriteRel (Succ e1) (Succ e2) | RewPlus0 : forall e:ArithExp, - RewriteRel (Plus Zero e) e + RewriteRel (Plus Zero e) e | RewPlusS : forall e1 e2:ArithExp, RewriteRel e1 e2 -> RewriteRel (Plus (Succ e1) e2) (Succ (Plus e1 e2)). - + Fixpoint plus (n p:nat) {struct n} : nat := match n with | 0 => p @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ Fixpoint plus'' (n p:nat) {struct n} : nat := Fixpoint even_test (n:nat) : bool := - match n + match n with 0 => true | 1 => false | S (S p) => even_test p @@ -749,20 +749,20 @@ Fixpoint even_test (n:nat) : bool := Reset even_test. Fixpoint even_test (n:nat) : bool := - match n - with + match n + with | 0 => true | S p => odd_test p end with odd_test (n:nat) : bool := match n - with + with | 0 => false | S p => even_test p end. - + Eval simpl in even_test. @@ -779,11 +779,11 @@ Section Principle_of_Induction. Variable P : nat -> Prop. Hypothesis base_case : P 0. Hypothesis inductive_step : forall n:nat, P n -> P (S n). -Fixpoint nat_ind (n:nat) : (P n) := +Fixpoint nat_ind (n:nat) : (P n) := match n return P n with | 0 => base_case | S m => inductive_step m (nat_ind m) - end. + end. End Principle_of_Induction. @@ -803,9 +803,9 @@ Variable P : nat -> nat ->Prop. Hypothesis base_case1 : forall x:nat, P 0 x. Hypothesis base_case2 : forall x:nat, P (S x) 0. Hypothesis inductive_step : forall n m:nat, P n m -> P (S n) (S m). -Fixpoint nat_double_ind (n m:nat){struct n} : P n m := - match n, m return P n m with - | 0 , x => base_case1 x +Fixpoint nat_double_ind (n m:nat){struct n} : P n m := + match n, m return P n m with + | 0 , x => base_case1 x | (S x), 0 => base_case2 x | (S x), (S y) => inductive_step x y (nat_double_ind x y) end. @@ -816,15 +816,15 @@ Variable P : nat -> nat -> Set. Hypothesis base_case1 : forall x:nat, P 0 x. Hypothesis base_case2 : forall x:nat, P (S x) 0. Hypothesis inductive_step : forall n m:nat, P n m -> P (S n) (S m). -Fixpoint nat_double_rec (n m:nat){struct n} : P n m := - match n, m return P n m with - | 0 , x => base_case1 x +Fixpoint nat_double_rec (n m:nat){struct n} : P n m := + match n, m return P n m with + | 0 , x => base_case1 x | (S x), 0 => base_case2 x | (S x), (S y) => inductive_step x y (nat_double_rec x y) end. End Principle_of_Double_Recursion. -Definition min : nat -> nat -> nat := +Definition min : nat -> nat -> nat := nat_double_rec (fun (x y:nat) => nat) (fun (x:nat) => 0) (fun (y:nat) => 0) @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ Require Import Minus. (* Fixpoint div (x y:nat){struct x}: nat := - if eq_nat_dec x 0 + if eq_nat_dec x 0 then 0 else if eq_nat_dec y 0 then x @@ -901,18 +901,18 @@ Qed. Lemma minus_smaller_positive : forall x y:nat, x <>0 -> y <> 0 -> x - y < x. Proof. - destruct x; destruct y; - ( simpl;intros; apply minus_smaller_S || + destruct x; destruct y; + ( simpl;intros; apply minus_smaller_S || intros; absurd (0=0); auto). Qed. -Definition minus_decrease : forall x y:nat, Acc lt x -> - x <> 0 -> +Definition minus_decrease : forall x y:nat, Acc lt x -> + x <> 0 -> y <> 0 -> Acc lt (x-y). Proof. intros x y H; case H. - intros Hz posz posy. + intros Hz posz posy. apply Hz; apply minus_smaller_positive; assumption. Defined. @@ -920,21 +920,19 @@ Print minus_decrease. -Definition div_aux (x y:nat)(H: Acc lt x):nat. - fix 3. - intros. - refine (if eq_nat_dec x 0 - then 0 - else if eq_nat_dec y 0 +Fixpoint div_aux (x y:nat)(H: Acc lt x):nat. + refine (if eq_nat_dec x 0 + then 0 + else if eq_nat_dec y 0 then y else div_aux (x-y) y _). - apply (minus_decrease x y H);assumption. + apply (minus_decrease x y H);assumption. Defined. Print div_aux. (* -div_aux = +div_aux = (fix div_aux (x y : nat) (H : Acc lt x) {struct H} : nat := match eq_nat_dec x 0 with | left _ => 0 @@ -948,7 +946,7 @@ div_aux = *) Require Import Wf_nat. -Definition div x y := div_aux x y (lt_wf x). +Definition div x y := div_aux x y (lt_wf x). Extraction div. (* @@ -974,7 +972,7 @@ Proof. Abort. (* - Lemma vector0_is_vnil_aux : forall (A:Set)(n:nat)(v:vector A n), + Lemma vector0_is_vnil_aux : forall (A:Set)(n:nat)(v:vector A n), n= 0 -> v = Vnil A. Toplevel input, characters 40281-40287 @@ -990,7 +988,7 @@ The term "Vnil A" has type "vector A 0" while it is expected to have type *) Require Import JMeq. -Lemma vector0_is_vnil_aux : forall (A:Set)(n:nat)(v:vector A n), +Lemma vector0_is_vnil_aux : forall (A:Set)(n:nat)(v:vector A n), n= 0 -> JMeq v (Vnil A). Proof. destruct v. @@ -1026,7 +1024,7 @@ Eval simpl in (fun (A:Set)(v:vector A 0) => v). Lemma Vid_eq : forall (n:nat) (A:Type)(v:vector A n), v=(Vid _ n v). Proof. - destruct v. + destruct v. reflexivity. reflexivity. Defined. @@ -1034,7 +1032,7 @@ Defined. Theorem zero_nil : forall A (v:vector A 0), v = Vnil. Proof. intros. - change (Vnil (A:=A)) with (Vid _ 0 v). + change (Vnil (A:=A)) with (Vid _ 0 v). apply Vid_eq. Defined. @@ -1050,7 +1048,7 @@ Defined. -Definition vector_double_rect : +Definition vector_double_rect : forall (A:Set) (P: forall (n:nat),(vector A n)->(vector A n) -> Type), P 0 Vnil Vnil -> (forall n (v1 v2 : vector A n) a b, P n v1 v2 -> @@ -1105,7 +1103,7 @@ Qed. | LCons : A -> LList A -> LList A. - + Definition head (A:Set)(s : Stream A) := match s with Cons a s' => a end. @@ -1144,7 +1142,7 @@ Hypothesis bisim2 : forall s1 s2:Stream A, R s1 s2 -> CoFixpoint park_ppl : forall s1 s2:Stream A, R s1 s2 -> EqSt s1 s2 := fun s1 s2 (p : R s1 s2) => - eqst s1 s2 (bisim1 p) + eqst s1 s2 (bisim1 p) (park_ppl (bisim2 p)). End Parks_Principle. @@ -1154,7 +1152,7 @@ Theorem map_iterate : forall (A:Set)(f:A->A)(x:A), Proof. intros A f x. apply park_ppl with - (R:= fun s1 s2 => exists x: A, + (R:= fun s1 s2 => exists x: A, s1 = iterate f (f x) /\ s2 = map f (iterate f x)). intros s1 s2 (x0,(eqs1,eqs2));rewrite eqs1;rewrite eqs2;reflexivity. |