diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml')
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml | 413 |
1 files changed, 214 insertions, 199 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml index b0ffc775..d04887a4 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ open Printer open CErrors open Util -open Term +open Constr +open EConstr open Vars open Namegen open Names open Pp open Tacmach open Termops -open Proof_type open Tacticals open Tactics open Indfun_common @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ open Libnames open Globnames open Context.Rel.Declaration +module RelDecl = Context.Rel.Declaration + (* let msgnl = Pp.msgnl *) (* @@ -42,6 +44,10 @@ let observe_tac s tac g = observe_tac_stream (str s) tac g *) +let pr_leconstr_fp = + let sigma, env = Pfedit.get_current_context () in + Printer.pr_leconstr_env env sigma + let debug_queue = Stack.create () let rec print_debug_queue e = @@ -93,6 +99,7 @@ let list_chop ?(msg="") n l = with Failure (msg') -> failwith (msg ^ msg') +let pop t = Vars.lift (-1) t let make_refl_eq constructor type_of_t t = (* let refl_equal_term = Lazy.force refl_equal in *) @@ -101,7 +108,7 @@ let make_refl_eq constructor type_of_t t = type pte_info = { - proving_tac : (Id.t list -> Tacmach.tactic); + proving_tac : (Id.t list -> Tacmach.tactic); is_valid : constr -> bool } @@ -129,16 +136,16 @@ let refine c = let thin l = Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.clear l) -let eq_constr u v = eq_constr_nounivs u v +let eq_constr sigma u v = EConstr.eq_constr_nounivs sigma u v -let is_trivial_eq t = +let is_trivial_eq sigma t = let res = try begin - match kind_of_term t with - | App(f,[|_;t1;t2|]) when eq_constr f (Lazy.force eq) -> - eq_constr t1 t2 - | App(f,[|t1;a1;t2;a2|]) when eq_constr f (jmeq ()) -> - eq_constr t1 t2 && eq_constr a1 a2 + match EConstr.kind sigma t with + | App(f,[|_;t1;t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (Lazy.force eq) -> + eq_constr sigma t1 t2 + | App(f,[|t1;a1;t2;a2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (jmeq ()) -> + eq_constr sigma t1 t2 && eq_constr sigma a1 a2 | _ -> false end with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> false @@ -146,30 +153,30 @@ let is_trivial_eq t = (* observe (str "is_trivial_eq " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr t ++ (if res then str " true" else str " false")); *) res -let rec incompatible_constructor_terms t1 t2 = - let c1,arg1 = decompose_app t1 - and c2,arg2 = decompose_app t2 +let rec incompatible_constructor_terms sigma t1 t2 = + let c1,arg1 = decompose_app sigma t1 + and c2,arg2 = decompose_app sigma t2 in - (not (eq_constr t1 t2)) && - isConstruct c1 && isConstruct c2 && + (not (eq_constr sigma t1 t2)) && + isConstruct sigma c1 && isConstruct sigma c2 && ( - not (eq_constr c1 c2) || - List.exists2 incompatible_constructor_terms arg1 arg2 + not (eq_constr sigma c1 c2) || + List.exists2 (incompatible_constructor_terms sigma) arg1 arg2 ) -let is_incompatible_eq t = +let is_incompatible_eq sigma t = let res = try - match kind_of_term t with - | App(f,[|_;t1;t2|]) when eq_constr f (Lazy.force eq) -> - incompatible_constructor_terms t1 t2 - | App(f,[|u1;t1;u2;t2|]) when eq_constr f (jmeq ()) -> - (eq_constr u1 u2 && - incompatible_constructor_terms t1 t2) + match EConstr.kind sigma t with + | App(f,[|_;t1;t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (Lazy.force eq) -> + incompatible_constructor_terms sigma t1 t2 + | App(f,[|u1;t1;u2;t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (jmeq ()) -> + (eq_constr sigma u1 u2 && + incompatible_constructor_terms sigma t1 t2) | _ -> false with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> false in - if res then observe (str "is_incompatible_eq " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr t); + if res then observe (str "is_incompatible_eq " ++ pr_leconstr_fp t); res let change_hyp_with_using msg hyp_id t tac : tactic = @@ -206,40 +213,41 @@ let prove_trivial_eq h_id context (constructor,type_of_term,term) = -let find_rectype env c = - let (t, l) = decompose_app (Reduction.whd_betaiotazeta env c) in - match kind_of_term t with +let find_rectype env sigma c = + let (t, l) = decompose_app sigma (Reductionops.whd_betaiotazeta sigma c) in + match EConstr.kind sigma t with | Ind ind -> (t, l) | Construct _ -> (t,l) | _ -> raise Not_found -let isAppConstruct ?(env=Global.env ()) t = +let isAppConstruct ?(env=Global.env ()) sigma t = try - let t',l = find_rectype (Global.env ()) t in - observe (str "isAppConstruct : " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr t ++ str " -> " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr (applist (t',l))); + let t',l = find_rectype env sigma t in + observe (str "isAppConstruct : " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr_env env sigma t ++ str " -> " ++ + Printer.pr_leconstr_env env sigma (applist (t',l))); true with Not_found -> false let nf_betaiotazeta = (* Reductionops.local_strong Reductionops.whd_betaiotazeta *) - let clos_norm_flags flgs env sigma t = - CClosure.norm_val (CClosure.create_clos_infos flgs env) (CClosure.inject (Reductionops.nf_evar sigma t)) in - clos_norm_flags CClosure.betaiotazeta Environ.empty_env Evd.empty + Reductionops.clos_norm_flags CClosure.betaiotazeta Environ.empty_env Evd.empty +exception NoChange -let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:Context.Rel.t) x t end_of_type = +let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:rel_context) x t end_of_type = let nochange ?t' msg = begin - observe (str ("Not treating ( "^msg^" )") ++ pr_lconstr t ++ str " " ++ match t' with None -> str "" | Some t -> Printer.pr_lconstr t ); - failwith "NoChange"; + observe (str ("Not treating ( "^msg^" )") ++ pr_leconstr_env env sigma t ++ str " " ++ + match t' with None -> str "" | Some t -> Printer.pr_leconstr_env env sigma t ); + raise NoChange; end in - let eq_constr = Evarconv.e_conv env (ref sigma) in - if not (noccurn 1 end_of_type) + let eq_constr c1 c2 = Evarconv.e_conv env (ref sigma) c1 c2 in + if not (noccurn sigma 1 end_of_type) then nochange "dependent"; (* if end_of_type depends on this term we don't touch it *) - if not (isApp t) then nochange "not an equality"; - let f_eq,args = destApp t in + if not (isApp sigma t) then nochange "not an equality"; + let f_eq,args = destApp sigma t in let constructor,t1,t2,t1_typ = try if (eq_constr f_eq (Lazy.force eq)) @@ -256,42 +264,42 @@ let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:Context.Rel.t) x t end_of_type = else nochange "not an equality" with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> nochange "not an equality" in - if not ((closed0 (fst t1)) && (closed0 (snd t1)))then nochange "not a closed lhs"; + if not ((closed0 sigma (fst t1)) && (closed0 sigma (snd t1)))then nochange "not a closed lhs"; let rec compute_substitution sub t1 t2 = (* observe (str "compute_substitution : " ++ pr_lconstr t1 ++ str " === " ++ pr_lconstr t2); *) - if isRel t2 + if isRel sigma t2 then - let t2 = destRel t2 in + let t2 = destRel sigma t2 in begin try let t1' = Int.Map.find t2 sub in if not (eq_constr t1 t1') then nochange "twice bound variable"; sub with Not_found -> - assert (closed0 t1); + assert (closed0 sigma t1); Int.Map.add t2 t1 sub end - else if isAppConstruct t1 && isAppConstruct t2 + else if isAppConstruct sigma t1 && isAppConstruct sigma t2 then begin - let c1,args1 = find_rectype env t1 - and c2,args2 = find_rectype env t2 + let c1,args1 = find_rectype env sigma t1 + and c2,args2 = find_rectype env sigma t2 in if not (eq_constr c1 c2) then nochange "cannot solve (diff)"; List.fold_left2 compute_substitution sub args1 args2 end else - if (eq_constr t1 t2) then sub else nochange ~t':(make_refl_eq constructor (Reduction.whd_all env t1) t2) "cannot solve (diff)" + if (eq_constr t1 t2) then sub else nochange ~t':(make_refl_eq constructor (Reductionops.whd_all env sigma t1) t2) "cannot solve (diff)" in let sub = compute_substitution Int.Map.empty (snd t1) (snd t2) in let sub = compute_substitution sub (fst t1) (fst t2) in - let end_of_type_with_pop = Termops.pop end_of_type in (*the equation will be removed *) + let end_of_type_with_pop = pop end_of_type in (*the equation will be removed *) let new_end_of_type = (* Ugly hack to prevent Map.fold order change between ocaml-3.08.3 and ocaml-3.08.4 Can be safely replaced by the next comment for Ocaml >= 3.08.4 *) let sub = Int.Map.bindings sub in - List.fold_left (fun end_of_type (i,t) -> lift 1 (substnl [t] (i-1) end_of_type)) + List.fold_left (fun end_of_type (i,t) -> liftn 1 i (substnl [t] (i-1) end_of_type)) end_of_type_with_pop sub in @@ -307,7 +315,7 @@ let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:Context.Rel.t) x t end_of_type = try let witness = Int.Map.find i sub in if is_local_def decl then anomaly (Pp.str "can not redefine a rel!"); - (Termops.pop end_of_type,ctxt_size,mkLetIn (get_name decl, witness, get_type decl, witness_fun)) + (pop end_of_type,ctxt_size,mkLetIn (RelDecl.get_name decl, witness, RelDecl.get_type decl, witness_fun)) with Not_found -> (mkProd_or_LetIn decl end_of_type, ctxt_size + 1, mkLambda_or_LetIn decl witness_fun) ) @@ -316,9 +324,9 @@ let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:Context.Rel.t) x t end_of_type = context in let new_type_of_hyp = - Reductionops.nf_betaiota Evd.empty new_type_of_hyp in + Reductionops.nf_betaiota env sigma new_type_of_hyp in let new_ctxt,new_end_of_type = - decompose_prod_n_assum ctxt_size new_type_of_hyp + decompose_prod_n_assum sigma ctxt_size new_type_of_hyp in let prove_new_hyp : tactic = tclTHEN @@ -351,21 +359,21 @@ let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:Context.Rel.t) x t end_of_type = new_ctxt,new_end_of_type,simpl_eq_tac -let is_property (ptes_info:ptes_info) t_x full_type_of_hyp = - if isApp t_x +let is_property sigma (ptes_info:ptes_info) t_x full_type_of_hyp = + if isApp sigma t_x then - let pte,args = destApp t_x in - if isVar pte && Array.for_all closed0 args + let pte,args = destApp sigma t_x in + if isVar sigma pte && Array.for_all (closed0 sigma) args then try - let info = Id.Map.find (destVar pte) ptes_info in + let info = Id.Map.find (destVar sigma pte) ptes_info in info.is_valid full_type_of_hyp with Not_found -> false else false else false -let isLetIn t = - match kind_of_term t with +let isLetIn sigma t = + match EConstr.kind sigma t with | LetIn _ -> true | _ -> false @@ -385,15 +393,16 @@ let rewrite_until_var arg_num eq_ids : tactic = will break the Guard when trying to save the Lemma. *) let test_var g = - let _,args = destApp (pf_concl g) in - not ((isConstruct args.(arg_num)) || isAppConstruct args.(arg_num)) + let sigma = project g in + let _,args = destApp sigma (pf_concl g) in + not ((isConstruct sigma args.(arg_num)) || isAppConstruct sigma args.(arg_num)) in let rec do_rewrite eq_ids g = if test_var g then tclIDTAC g else match eq_ids with - | [] -> anomaly (Pp.str "Cannot find a way to prove recursive property"); + | [] -> anomaly (Pp.str "Cannot find a way to prove recursive property."); | eq_id::eq_ids -> tclTHEN (tclTRY (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteRL (mkVar eq_id)))) @@ -405,30 +414,30 @@ let rewrite_until_var arg_num eq_ids : tactic = let rec_pte_id = Id.of_string "Hrec" let clean_hyp_with_heq ptes_infos eq_hyps hyp_id env sigma = - let coq_False = Coqlib.build_coq_False () in - let coq_True = Coqlib.build_coq_True () in - let coq_I = Coqlib.build_coq_I () in + let coq_False = EConstr.of_constr (Universes.constr_of_global @@ Coqlib.build_coq_False ()) in + let coq_True = EConstr.of_constr (Universes.constr_of_global @@ Coqlib.build_coq_True ()) in + let coq_I = EConstr.of_constr (Universes.constr_of_global @@ Coqlib.build_coq_I ()) in let rec scan_type context type_of_hyp : tactic = - if isLetIn type_of_hyp then + if isLetIn sigma type_of_hyp then let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn type_of_hyp context in let reduced_type_of_hyp = nf_betaiotazeta real_type_of_hyp in (* length of context didn't change ? *) let new_context,new_typ_of_hyp = - decompose_prod_n_assum (List.length context) reduced_type_of_hyp + decompose_prod_n_assum sigma (List.length context) reduced_type_of_hyp in tclTHENLIST [ h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id); scan_type new_context new_typ_of_hyp ] - else if isProd type_of_hyp + else if isProd sigma type_of_hyp then begin - let (x,t_x,t') = destProd type_of_hyp in + let (x,t_x,t') = destProd sigma type_of_hyp in let actual_real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn t' context in - if is_property ptes_infos t_x actual_real_type_of_hyp then + if is_property sigma ptes_infos t_x actual_real_type_of_hyp then begin - let pte,pte_args = (destApp t_x) in - let (* fix_info *) prove_rec_hyp = (Id.Map.find (destVar pte) ptes_infos).proving_tac in - let popped_t' = Termops.pop t' in + let pte,pte_args = (destApp sigma t_x) in + let (* fix_info *) prove_rec_hyp = (Id.Map.find (destVar sigma pte) ptes_infos).proving_tac in + let popped_t' = pop t' in let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context in let prove_new_type_of_hyp = let context_length = List.length context in @@ -465,20 +474,20 @@ let clean_hyp_with_heq ptes_infos eq_hyps hyp_id env sigma = scan_type context popped_t' ] end - else if eq_constr t_x coq_False then + else if eq_constr sigma t_x coq_False then begin (* observe (str "Removing : "++ Ppconstr.pr_id hyp_id++ *) (* str " since it has False in its preconds " *) (* ); *) raise TOREMOVE; (* False -> .. useless *) end - else if is_incompatible_eq t_x then raise TOREMOVE (* t_x := C1 ... = C2 ... *) - else if eq_constr t_x coq_True (* Trivial => we remove this precons *) + else if is_incompatible_eq sigma t_x then raise TOREMOVE (* t_x := C1 ... = C2 ... *) + else if eq_constr sigma t_x coq_True (* Trivial => we remove this precons *) then (* observe (str "In "++Ppconstr.pr_id hyp_id++ *) (* str " removing useless precond True" *) (* ); *) - let popped_t' = Termops.pop t' in + let popped_t' = pop t' in let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context in @@ -504,15 +513,15 @@ let clean_hyp_with_heq ptes_infos eq_hyps hyp_id env sigma = ((* observe_tac "prove_trivial" *) prove_trivial); scan_type context popped_t' ] - else if is_trivial_eq t_x + else if is_trivial_eq sigma t_x then (* t_x := t = t => we remove this precond *) - let popped_t' = Termops.pop t' in + let popped_t' = pop t' in let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context in - let hd,args = destApp t_x in + let hd,args = destApp sigma t_x in let get_args hd args = - if eq_constr hd (Lazy.force eq) + if eq_constr sigma hd (Lazy.force eq) then (Lazy.force refl_equal,args.(0),args.(1)) else (jmeq_refl (),args.(0),args.(1)) in @@ -533,7 +542,7 @@ let clean_hyp_with_heq ptes_infos eq_hyps hyp_id env sigma = tclTHEN tac (scan_type new_context new_t') - with Failure "NoChange" -> + with NoChange -> (* Last thing todo : push the rel in the context and continue *) scan_type (LocalAssum (x,t_x) :: context) t' end @@ -584,7 +593,7 @@ let treat_new_case ptes_infos nb_prod continue_tac term dyn_infos = tclTHENLIST [ (* We first introduce the variables *) - tclDO nb_first_intro (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intro_avoiding dyn_infos.rec_hyps)); + tclDO nb_first_intro (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intro_avoiding (Id.Set.of_list dyn_infos.rec_hyps))); (* Then the equation itself *) Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intro_using heq_id); onLastHypId (fun heq_id -> tclTHENLIST [ @@ -595,18 +604,18 @@ let treat_new_case ptes_infos nb_prod continue_tac term dyn_infos = let new_term_value_eq = pf_unsafe_type_of g' (mkVar heq_id) in (* compute the new value of the body *) let new_term_value = - match kind_of_term new_term_value_eq with + match EConstr.kind (project g') new_term_value_eq with | App(f,[| _;_;args2 |]) -> args2 | _ -> observe (str "cannot compute new term value : " ++ pr_gls g' ++ fnl () ++ str "last hyp is" ++ - pr_lconstr_env (pf_env g') Evd.empty new_term_value_eq + pr_leconstr_env (pf_env g') (project g') new_term_value_eq ); - anomaly (Pp.str "cannot compute new term value") + anomaly (Pp.str "cannot compute new term value.") in let fun_body = mkLambda(Anonymous, pf_unsafe_type_of g' term, - Termops.replace_term term (mkRel 1) dyn_infos.info + Termops.replace_term (project g') term (mkRel 1) dyn_infos.info ) in let new_body = pf_nf_betaiota g' (mkApp(fun_body,[| new_term_value |])) in @@ -683,34 +692,36 @@ let instanciate_hyps_with_args (do_prove:Id.t list -> tactic) hyps args_id = let build_proof (interactive_proof:bool) - (fnames:constant list) + (fnames:Constant.t list) ptes_infos dyn_infos : tactic = let rec build_proof_aux do_finalize dyn_infos : tactic = fun g -> + let env = pf_env g in + let sigma = project g in (* observe (str "proving on " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr_env (pf_env g) term);*) - match kind_of_term dyn_infos.info with + match EConstr.kind sigma dyn_infos.info with | Case(ci,ct,t,cb) -> let do_finalize_t dyn_info' = fun g -> let t = dyn_info'.info in let dyn_infos = {dyn_info' with info = mkCase(ci,ct,t,cb)} in - let g_nb_prod = nb_prod (pf_concl g) in + let g_nb_prod = nb_prod (project g) (pf_concl g) in let type_of_term = pf_unsafe_type_of g t in let term_eq = make_refl_eq (Lazy.force refl_equal) type_of_term t in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (term_eq::(List.map mkVar dyn_infos.rec_hyps))); thin dyn_infos.rec_hyps; Proofview.V82.of_tactic (pattern_option [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1],t] None); (fun g -> observe_tac "toto" ( - tclTHENSEQ [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.case t); + tclTHENLIST [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.case t); (fun g' -> - let g'_nb_prod = nb_prod (pf_concl g') in + let g'_nb_prod = nb_prod (project g') (pf_concl g') in let nb_instanciate_partial = g'_nb_prod - g_nb_prod in observe_tac "treat_new_case" (treat_new_case @@ -730,7 +741,7 @@ let build_proof build_proof do_finalize_t {dyn_infos with info = t} g | Lambda(n,t,b) -> begin - match kind_of_term( pf_concl g) with + match EConstr.kind sigma (pf_concl g) with | Prod _ -> tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro) @@ -760,9 +771,9 @@ let build_proof | Const _ | Var _ | Meta _ | Evar _ | Sort _ | Construct _ | Ind _ -> do_finalize dyn_infos g | App(_,_) -> - let f,args = decompose_app dyn_infos.info in + let f,args = decompose_app sigma dyn_infos.info in begin - match kind_of_term f with + match EConstr.kind sigma f with | App _ -> assert false (* we have collected all the app in decompose_app *) | Proj _ -> assert false (*FIXME*) | Var _ | Construct _ | Rel _ | Evar _ | Meta _ | Ind _ | Sort _ | Prod _ -> @@ -784,7 +795,7 @@ let build_proof do_finalize dyn_infos g | Lambda _ -> let new_term = - Reductionops.nf_beta Evd.empty dyn_infos.info in + Reductionops.nf_beta env sigma dyn_infos.info in build_proof do_finalize {dyn_infos with info = new_term} g | LetIn _ -> @@ -815,10 +826,11 @@ let build_proof build_proof new_finalize {dyn_infos with info = f } g end | Fix _ | CoFix _ -> - error ( "Anonymous local (co)fixpoints are not handled yet") + user_err Pp.(str ( "Anonymous local (co)fixpoints are not handled yet")) + - | Proj _ -> error "Prod" - | Prod _ -> error "Prod" + | Proj _ -> user_err Pp.(str "Prod") + | Prod _ -> do_finalize dyn_infos g | LetIn _ -> let new_infos = { dyn_infos with @@ -833,10 +845,10 @@ let build_proof h_reduce_with_zeta Locusops.onConcl; build_proof do_finalize new_infos ] g - | Rel _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "Free var in goal conclusion !") + | Rel _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "Free var in goal conclusion!") and build_proof do_finalize dyn_infos g = (* observe (str "proving with "++Printer.pr_lconstr dyn_infos.info++ str " on goal " ++ pr_gls g); *) - observe_tac_stream (str "build_proof with " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr dyn_infos.info ) (build_proof_aux do_finalize dyn_infos) g + observe_tac_stream (str "build_proof with " ++ pr_leconstr_fp dyn_infos.info ) (build_proof_aux do_finalize dyn_infos) g and build_proof_args do_finalize dyn_infos (* f_args' args *) :tactic = fun g -> let (f_args',args) = dyn_infos.info in @@ -902,7 +914,7 @@ let prove_rec_hyp_for_struct fix_info = (fun eq_hyps -> tclTHEN (rewrite_until_var (fix_info.idx) eq_hyps) (fun g -> - let _,pte_args = destApp (pf_concl g) in + let _,pte_args = destApp (project g) (pf_concl g) in let rec_hyp_proof = mkApp(mkVar fix_info.name,array_get_start pte_args) in @@ -923,10 +935,11 @@ let generalize_non_dep hyp g = let to_revert,_ = let open Context.Named.Declaration in Environ.fold_named_context_reverse (fun (clear,keep) decl -> + let decl = map_named_decl EConstr.of_constr decl in let hyp = get_id decl in if Id.List.mem hyp hyps - || List.exists (Termops.occur_var_in_decl env hyp) keep - || Termops.occur_var env hyp hyp_typ + || List.exists (Termops.occur_var_in_decl env (project g) hyp) keep + || Termops.occur_var env (project g) hyp hyp_typ || Termops.is_section_variable hyp (* should be dangerous *) then (clear,decl::keep) else (hyp::clear,keep)) @@ -938,8 +951,8 @@ let generalize_non_dep hyp g = ((* observe_tac "thin" *) (thin to_revert)) g -let id_of_decl decl = Nameops.out_name (get_name decl) -let var_of_decl decl = mkVar (id_of_decl decl) +let id_of_decl = RelDecl.get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id +let var_of_decl = id_of_decl %> mkVar let revert idl = tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (List.map mkVar idl))) @@ -949,11 +962,12 @@ let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num (* observe (str "nb_args := " ++ str (string_of_int nb_args)); *) (* observe (str "nb_params := " ++ str (string_of_int nb_params)); *) (* observe (str "rec_args_num := " ++ str (string_of_int (rec_args_num + 1) )); *) - let f_def = Global.lookup_constant (fst (destConst f)) in + let f_def = Global.lookup_constant (fst (destConst evd f)) in let eq_lhs = mkApp(f,Array.init (nb_params + nb_args) (fun i -> mkRel(nb_params + nb_args - i))) in - let f_body = Option.get (Global.body_of_constant_body f_def) in - let params,f_body_with_params = decompose_lam_n nb_params f_body in - let (_,num),(_,_,bodies) = destFix f_body_with_params in + let (f_body, _) = Option.get (Global.body_of_constant_body f_def) in + let f_body = EConstr.of_constr f_body in + let params,f_body_with_params = decompose_lam_n evd nb_params f_body in + let (_,num),(_,_,bodies) = destFix evd f_body_with_params in let fnames_with_params = let params = Array.init nb_params (fun i -> mkRel(nb_params - i)) in let fnames = List.rev (Array.to_list (Array.map (fun f -> mkApp(f,params)) fnames)) in @@ -968,20 +982,20 @@ let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num let (type_ctxt,type_of_f),evd = let evd,t = Typing.type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd f in - decompose_prod_n_assum + decompose_prod_n_assum evd (nb_params + nb_args) t,evd in let eqn = mkApp(Lazy.force eq,[|type_of_f;eq_lhs;eq_rhs|]) in let lemma_type = it_mkProd_or_LetIn eqn type_ctxt in (* Pp.msgnl (str "lemma type " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr lemma_type ++ fnl () ++ str "f_body " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr f_body); *) - let f_id = Label.to_id (con_label (fst (destConst f))) in + let f_id = Label.to_id (Constant.label (fst (destConst evd f))) in let prove_replacement = - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ tclDO (nb_params + rec_args_num + 1) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro); observe_tac "" (fun g -> let rec_id = pf_nth_hyp_id g 1 in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [observe_tac "generalize_non_dep in generate_equation_lemma" (generalize_non_dep rec_id); observe_tac "h_case" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (mkVar rec_id))); (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intros_reflexivity)] g @@ -1008,10 +1022,10 @@ let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num let do_replace (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num all_funs g = let equation_lemma = try - let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst f)) (*FIXME*) in + let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst !evd f)) (*FIXME*) in mkConst (Option.get finfos.equation_lemma) with (Not_found | Option.IsNone as e) -> - let f_id = Label.to_id (con_label (fst (destConst f))) in + let f_id = Label.to_id (Constant.label (fst (destConst !evd f))) in (*i The next call to mk_equation_id is valid since we will construct the lemma Ensures by: obvious i*) @@ -1020,12 +1034,12 @@ let do_replace (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num a let _ = match e with | Option.IsNone -> - let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst f)) in + let finfos = find_Function_infos (fst (destConst !evd f)) in update_Function {finfos with equation_lemma = Some (match Nametab.locate (qualid_of_ident equation_lemma_id) with ConstRef c -> c - | _ -> CErrors.anomaly (Pp.str "Not a constant") + | _ -> CErrors.anomaly (Pp.str "Not a constant.") ) } | _ -> () @@ -1036,11 +1050,12 @@ let do_replace (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num a (Global.env ()) !evd (Constrintern.locate_reference (qualid_of_ident equation_lemma_id)) in + let res = EConstr.of_constr res in evd:=evd'; let _ = Typing.e_type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd res in res in - let nb_intro_to_do = nb_prod (pf_concl g) in + let nb_intro_to_do = nb_prod (project g) (pf_concl g) in tclTHEN (tclDO nb_intro_to_do (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro)) ( @@ -1059,7 +1074,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam (* Pp.msgnl (str "princ_type " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr princ_type); *) (* Pp.msgnl (str "all_funs "); *) (* Array.iter (fun c -> Pp.msgnl (Printer.pr_lconstr c)) all_funs; *) - let princ_info = compute_elim_sig princ_type in + let princ_info = compute_elim_sig (project g) princ_type in let fresh_id = let avoid = ref (pf_ids_of_hyps g) in (fun na -> @@ -1072,7 +1087,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam (Name new_id) ) in - let fresh_decl = map_name fresh_id in + let fresh_decl = RelDecl.map_name fresh_id in let princ_info : elim_scheme = { princ_info with params = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.params; @@ -1083,16 +1098,16 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam in let get_body const = match Global.body_of_constant const with - | Some body -> + | Some (body, _) -> Tacred.cbv_norm_flags (CClosure.RedFlags.mkflags [CClosure.RedFlags.fZETA]) (Global.env ()) (Evd.empty) - body - | None -> error ( "Cannot define a principle over an axiom ") + (EConstr.of_constr body) + | None -> user_err Pp.(str "Cannot define a principle over an axiom ") in let fbody = get_body fnames.(fun_num) in - let f_ctxt,f_body = decompose_lam fbody in + let f_ctxt,f_body = decompose_lam (project g) fbody in let f_ctxt_length = List.length f_ctxt in let diff_params = princ_info.nparams - f_ctxt_length in let full_params,princ_params,fbody_with_full_params = @@ -1119,27 +1134,27 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam ) in observe (str "full_params := " ++ - prlist_with_sep spc (fun decl -> Ppconstr.pr_id (Nameops.out_name (get_name decl))) + prlist_with_sep spc (RelDecl.get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id %> Ppconstr.pr_id) full_params ); observe (str "princ_params := " ++ - prlist_with_sep spc (fun decl -> Ppconstr.pr_id (Nameops.out_name (get_name decl))) + prlist_with_sep spc (RelDecl.get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id %> Ppconstr.pr_id) princ_params ); observe (str "fbody_with_full_params := " ++ - pr_lconstr fbody_with_full_params + pr_leconstr_env (Global.env ()) !evd fbody_with_full_params ); let all_funs_with_full_params = Array.map (fun f -> applist(f, List.rev_map var_of_decl full_params)) all_funs in let fix_offset = List.length princ_params in let ptes_to_fix,infos = - match kind_of_term fbody_with_full_params with + match EConstr.kind (project g) fbody_with_full_params with | Fix((idxs,i),(names,typess,bodies)) -> let bodies_with_all_params = Array.map (fun body -> - Reductionops.nf_betaiota Evd.empty + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) (applist(substl (List.rev (Array.to_list all_funs_with_full_params)) body, List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params)) ) @@ -1148,14 +1163,14 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam let info_array = Array.mapi (fun i types -> - let types = prod_applist types (List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params) in + let types = prod_applist (project g) types (List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params) in { idx = idxs.(i) - fix_offset; - name = Nameops.out_name (fresh_id names.(i)); + name = Nameops.Name.get_id (fresh_id names.(i)); types = types; offset = fix_offset; nb_realargs = List.length - (fst (decompose_lam bodies.(i))) - fix_offset; + (fst (decompose_lam (project g) bodies.(i))) - fix_offset; body_with_param = bodies_with_all_params.(i); num_in_block = i } @@ -1165,24 +1180,24 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam let pte_to_fix,rev_info = List.fold_left_i (fun i (acc_map,acc_info) decl -> - let pte = get_name decl in + let pte = RelDecl.get_name decl in let infos = info_array.(i) in - let type_args,_ = decompose_prod infos.types in + let type_args,_ = decompose_prod (project g) infos.types in let nargs = List.length type_args in let f = applist(mkConst fnames.(i), List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_info.params) in let first_args = Array.init nargs (fun i -> mkRel (nargs -i)) in let app_f = mkApp(f,first_args) in let pte_args = (Array.to_list first_args)@[app_f] in - let app_pte = applist(mkVar (Nameops.out_name pte),pte_args) in + let app_pte = applist(mkVar (Nameops.Name.get_id pte),pte_args) in let body_with_param,num = let body = get_body fnames.(i) in let body_with_full_params = - Reductionops.nf_betaiota Evd.empty ( + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) ( applist(body,List.rev_map var_of_decl full_params)) in - match kind_of_term body_with_full_params with + match EConstr.kind (project g) body_with_full_params with | Fix((_,num),(_,_,bs)) -> - Reductionops.nf_betaiota Evd.empty + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) ( (applist (substl @@ -1191,7 +1206,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam bs.(num), List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params)) ),num - | _ -> error "Not a mutual block" + | _ -> user_err Pp.(str "Not a mutual block") in let info = {infos with @@ -1200,9 +1215,9 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam num_in_block = num } in -(* observe (str "binding " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id (Nameops.out_name pte) ++ *) +(* observe (str "binding " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id (Nameops.Name.get_id pte) ++ *) (* str " to " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id info.name); *) - (Id.Map.add (Nameops.out_name pte) info acc_map,info::acc_info) + (Id.Map.add (Nameops.Name.get_id pte) info acc_map,info::acc_info) ) 0 (Id.Map.empty,[]) @@ -1215,7 +1230,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam let mk_fixes : tactic = let pre_info,infos = list_chop fun_num infos in match pre_info,infos with - | [],[] -> tclIDTAC + | _,[] -> tclIDTAC | _, this_fix_info::others_infos -> let other_fix_infos = List.map @@ -1231,10 +1246,9 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam else Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.mutual_fix this_fix_info.name (this_fix_info.idx + 1) other_fix_infos 0) - | _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "Not a valid information") in let first_tac : tactic = (* every operations until fix creations *) - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ observe_tac "introducing params" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.params))); observe_tac "introducing predictes" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.predicates))); observe_tac "introducing branches" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.branches))); @@ -1243,16 +1257,16 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam in let intros_after_fixes : tactic = fun gl -> - let ctxt,pte_app = (decompose_prod_assum (pf_concl gl)) in - let pte,pte_args = (decompose_app pte_app) in + let ctxt,pte_app = (decompose_prod_assum (project gl) (pf_concl gl)) in + let pte,pte_args = (decompose_app (project gl) pte_app) in try let pte = - try destVar pte - with DestKO -> anomaly (Pp.str "Property is not a variable") + try destVar (project gl) pte + with DestKO -> anomaly (Pp.str "Property is not a variable.") in let fix_info = Id.Map.find pte ptes_to_fix in let nb_args = fix_info.nb_realargs in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ (* observe_tac ("introducing args") *) (tclDO nb_args (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro)); (fun g -> (* replacement of the function by its body *) @@ -1266,18 +1280,18 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam nb_rec_hyps = -100; rec_hyps = []; info = - Reductionops.nf_betaiota Evd.empty + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) (applist(fix_body,List.rev_map mkVar args_id)); eq_hyps = [] } in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ observe_tac "do_replace" (do_replace evd full_params (fix_info.idx + List.length princ_params) - (args_id@(List.map (fun decl -> Nameops.out_name (get_name decl)) princ_params)) + (args_id@(List.map (RelDecl.get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) princ_params)) (all_funs.(fix_info.num_in_block)) fix_info.num_in_block all_funs @@ -1314,7 +1328,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam ] gl with Not_found -> let nb_args = min (princ_info.nargs) (List.length ctxt) in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ tclDO nb_args (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro); (fun g -> (* replacement of the function by its body *) @@ -1326,7 +1340,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam nb_rec_hyps = -100; rec_hyps = []; info = - Reductionops.nf_betaiota Evd.empty + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) Evd.empty (applist(fbody_with_full_params, (List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params)@ (List.rev_map mkVar args_id) @@ -1334,8 +1348,8 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam eq_hyps = [] } in - let fname = destConst (fst (decompose_app (List.hd (List.rev pte_args)))) in - tclTHENSEQ + let fname = destConst (project g) (fst (decompose_app (project g) (List.hd (List.rev pte_args)))) in + tclTHENLIST [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst fname))]); let do_prove = build_proof @@ -1375,7 +1389,7 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam (* Proof of principles of general functions *) -(* let hrec_id = +(* let hrec_id = Recdef.hrec_id *) (* and acc_inv_id = Recdef.acc_inv_id *) (* and ltof_ref = Recdef.ltof_ref *) (* and acc_rel = Recdef.acc_rel *) @@ -1389,12 +1403,12 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam let prove_with_tcc tcc_lemma_constr eqs : tactic = match !tcc_lemma_constr with - | None -> anomaly (Pp.str "No tcc proof !!") - | Some lemma -> + | Undefined -> anomaly (Pp.str "No tcc proof !!") + | Value lemma -> fun gls -> (* let hid = next_ident_away_in_goal h_id (pf_ids_of_hyps gls) in *) (* let ids = hid::pf_ids_of_hyps gls in *) - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ (* generalize [lemma]; *) (* h_intro hid; *) @@ -1408,7 +1422,7 @@ let prove_with_tcc tcc_lemma_constr eqs : tactic = Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Eauto.gen_eauto (false,5) [] (Some [])) ] gls - + | Not_needed -> tclIDTAC let backtrack_eqs_until_hrec hrec eqs : tactic = fun gls -> @@ -1416,14 +1430,14 @@ let backtrack_eqs_until_hrec hrec eqs : tactic = let rewrite = tclFIRST (List.map (fun x -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteRL x)) eqs ) in - let _,hrec_concl = decompose_prod (pf_unsafe_type_of gls (mkVar hrec)) in - let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp hrec_concl)) in - let f = (fst (destApp f_app)) in + let _,hrec_concl = decompose_prod (project gls) (pf_unsafe_type_of gls (mkVar hrec)) in + let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp (project gls) hrec_concl)) in + let f = (fst (destApp (project gls) f_app)) in let rec backtrack : tactic = fun g -> - let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp (pf_concl g))) in - match kind_of_term f_app with - | App(f',_) when eq_constr f' f -> tclIDTAC g + let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp (project g) (pf_concl g))) in + match EConstr.kind (project g) f_app with + | App(f',_) when eq_constr (project g) f' f -> tclIDTAC g | _ -> tclTHEN rewrite backtrack g in backtrack gls @@ -1449,13 +1463,13 @@ let rec rewrite_eqs_in_eqs eqs = let new_prove_with_tcc is_mes acc_inv hrec tcc_hyps eqs : tactic = fun gls -> - (tclTHENSEQ + (tclTHENLIST [ backtrack_eqs_until_hrec hrec eqs; (* observe_tac ("new_prove_with_tcc ( applying "^(Id.to_string hrec)^" )" ) *) (tclTHENS (* We must have exactly ONE subgoal !*) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (mkVar hrec))) - [ tclTHENSEQ + [ tclTHENLIST [ (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (keep (tcc_hyps@eqs))); (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (Lazy.force acc_inv))); @@ -1474,7 +1488,7 @@ let new_prove_with_tcc is_mes acc_inv hrec tcc_hyps eqs : tactic = tclCOMPLETE( Eauto.eauto_with_bases (true,5) - [{ Tacexpr.delayed = fun _ sigma -> Sigma.here (Lazy.force refl_equal) sigma}] + [(fun _ sigma -> (sigma, Lazy.force refl_equal))] [Hints.Hint_db.empty empty_transparent_state false] ) ) @@ -1487,20 +1501,20 @@ let new_prove_with_tcc is_mes acc_inv hrec tcc_hyps eqs : tactic = gls -let is_valid_hypothesis predicates_name = +let is_valid_hypothesis sigma predicates_name = let predicates_name = List.fold_right Id.Set.add predicates_name Id.Set.empty in let is_pte typ = - if isApp typ + if isApp sigma typ then - let pte,_ = destApp typ in - if isVar pte - then Id.Set.mem (destVar pte) predicates_name + let pte,_ = destApp sigma typ in + if isVar sigma pte + then Id.Set.mem (destVar sigma pte) predicates_name else false else false in let rec is_valid_hypothesis typ = is_pte typ || - match kind_of_term typ with + match EConstr.kind sigma typ with | Prod(_,pte,typ') -> is_pte pte && is_valid_hypothesis typ' | _ -> false in @@ -1510,7 +1524,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen (f_ref,functional_ref,eq_ref) tcc_lemma_ref is_mes rec_arg_num rec_arg_type relation gl = let princ_type = pf_concl gl in - let princ_info = compute_elim_sig princ_type in + let princ_info = compute_elim_sig (project gl) princ_type in let fresh_id = let avoid = ref (pf_ids_of_hyps gl) in fun na -> @@ -1556,17 +1570,17 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen | _ -> assert false in (* observe (str "rec_arg_id := " ++ pr_lconstr (mkVar rec_arg_id)); *) - let subst_constrs = List.map (fun decl -> mkVar (Nameops.out_name (get_name decl))) (pre_rec_arg@princ_info.params) in + let subst_constrs = List.map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id %> mkVar) (pre_rec_arg@princ_info.params) in let relation = substl subst_constrs relation in let input_type = substl subst_constrs rec_arg_type in - let wf_thm_id = Nameops.out_name (fresh_id (Name (Id.of_string "wf_R"))) in + let wf_thm_id = Nameops.Name.get_id (fresh_id (Name (Id.of_string "wf_R"))) in let acc_rec_arg_id = - Nameops.out_name (fresh_id (Name (Id.of_string ("Acc_"^(Id.to_string rec_arg_id))))) + Nameops.Name.get_id (fresh_id (Name (Id.of_string ("Acc_"^(Id.to_string rec_arg_id))))) in let revert l = tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.generalize (List.map mkVar l))) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear l)) in - let fix_id = Nameops.out_name (fresh_id (Name hrec_id)) in + let fix_id = Nameops.Name.get_id (fresh_id (Name hrec_id)) in let prove_rec_arg_acc g = ((* observe_tac "prove_rec_arg_acc" *) (tclCOMPLETE @@ -1584,11 +1598,12 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen ) g in - let args_ids = List.map (fun decl -> Nameops.out_name (get_name decl)) princ_info.args in + let args_ids = List.map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) princ_info.args in let lemma = match !tcc_lemma_ref with - | None -> error "No tcc proof !!" - | Some lemma -> lemma + | Undefined -> user_err Pp.(str "No tcc proof !!") + | Value lemma -> EConstr.of_constr lemma + | Not_needed -> EConstr.of_constr (Universes.constr_of_global @@ Coqlib.build_coq_I ()) in (* let rec list_diff del_list check_list = *) (* match del_list with *) @@ -1606,9 +1621,9 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen let hid = next_ident_away_in_goal (Id.of_string "prov") - hyps + (Id.Set.of_list hyps) in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [lemma]); Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro hid); @@ -1627,11 +1642,11 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen ] gls in - tclTHENSEQ + tclTHENLIST [ observe_tac "start_tac" start_tac; h_intros - (List.rev_map (fun decl -> Nameops.out_name (get_name decl)) + (List.rev_map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) (princ_info.args@princ_info.branches@princ_info.predicates@princ_info.params) ); (* observe_tac "" *) Proofview.V82.of_tactic (assert_by @@ -1648,7 +1663,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteLR (mkConst eq_ref)); (* observe_tac "finish" *) (fun gl' -> let body = - let _,args = destApp (pf_concl gl') in + let _,args = destApp (project gl') (pf_concl gl') in Array.last args in let body_info rec_hyps = @@ -1669,14 +1684,14 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen in let acc_inv = lazy (mkApp(Lazy.force acc_inv, [|mkVar acc_rec_arg_id|])) in let predicates_names = - List.map (fun decl -> Nameops.out_name (get_name decl)) princ_info.predicates + List.map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) princ_info.predicates in let pte_info = { proving_tac = (fun eqs -> (* msgnl (str "tcc_list := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id !tcc_list); *) -(* msgnl (str "princ_info.args := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id (List.map (fun (na,_,_) -> (Nameops.out_name na)) princ_info.args)); *) -(* msgnl (str "princ_info.params := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id (List.map (fun (na,_,_) -> (Nameops.out_name na)) princ_info.params)); *) +(* msgnl (str "princ_info.args := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id (List.map (fun (na,_,_) -> (Nameops.Name.get_id na)) princ_info.args)); *) +(* msgnl (str "princ_info.params := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id (List.map (fun (na,_,_) -> (Nameops.Name.get_id na)) princ_info.params)); *) (* msgnl (str "acc_rec_arg_id := "++ Ppconstr.pr_id acc_rec_arg_id); *) (* msgnl (str "eqs := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id eqs); *) @@ -1685,13 +1700,13 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen is_mes acc_inv fix_id (!tcc_list@(List.map - (fun decl -> (Nameops.out_name (get_name decl))) + (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) (princ_info.args@princ_info.params) )@ ([acc_rec_arg_id])) eqs ) ); - is_valid = is_valid_hypothesis predicates_names + is_valid = is_valid_hypothesis (project gl') predicates_names } in let ptes_info : pte_info Id.Map.t = @@ -1714,7 +1729,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen (* observe_tac "instanciate_hyps_with_args" *) (instanciate_hyps_with_args make_proof - (List.map (fun decl -> Nameops.out_name (get_name decl)) princ_info.branches) + (List.map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) princ_info.branches) (List.rev args_ids) ) gl' |