diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/setoid_ring/Pol.v')
| -rw-r--r-- | contrib/setoid_ring/Pol.v | 1195 |
1 files changed, 1195 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/setoid_ring/Pol.v b/contrib/setoid_ring/Pol.v new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2bf2574f --- /dev/null +++ b/contrib/setoid_ring/Pol.v @@ -0,0 +1,1195 @@ +Set Implicit Arguments. +Require Import Setoid. +Require Export BinList. +Require Import BinPos. +Require Import BinInt. +Require Export Ring_th. + +Section MakeRingPol. + + (* Ring elements *) + Variable R:Type. + Variable (rO rI : R) (radd rmul rsub: R->R->R) (ropp : R->R). + Variable req : R -> R -> Prop. + + (* Ring properties *) + Variable Rsth : Setoid_Theory R req. + Variable Reqe : ring_eq_ext radd rmul ropp req. + Variable ARth : almost_ring_theory rO rI radd rmul rsub ropp req. + + (* Coefficients *) + Variable C: Type. + Variable (cO cI: C) (cadd cmul csub : C->C->C) (copp : C->C). + Variable ceqb : C->C->bool. + Variable phi : C -> R. + Variable CRmorph : ring_morph rO rI radd rmul rsub ropp req + cO cI cadd cmul csub copp ceqb phi. + + + (* R notations *) + Notation "0" := rO. Notation "1" := rI. + Notation "x + y" := (radd x y). Notation "x * y " := (rmul x y). + Notation "x - y " := (rsub x y). Notation "- x" := (ropp x). + Notation "x == y" := (req x y). + + (* C notations *) + Notation "x +! y" := (cadd x y). Notation "x *! y " := (cmul x y). + Notation "x -! y " := (csub x y). Notation "-! x" := (copp x). + Notation " x ?=! y" := (ceqb x y). Notation "[ x ]" := (phi x). + + (* Usefull tactics *) + Add Setoid R req Rsth as R_set1. + Ltac rrefl := gen_reflexivity Rsth. + Add Morphism radd : radd_ext. exact (Radd_ext Reqe). Qed. + Add Morphism rmul : rmul_ext. exact (Rmul_ext Reqe). Qed. + Add Morphism ropp : ropp_ext. exact (Ropp_ext Reqe). Qed. + Add Morphism rsub : rsub_ext. exact (ARsub_ext Rsth Reqe ARth). Qed. + Ltac rsimpl := gen_srewrite 0 1 radd rmul rsub ropp req Rsth Reqe ARth. + Ltac add_push := gen_add_push radd Rsth Reqe ARth. + Ltac mul_push := gen_mul_push rmul Rsth Reqe ARth. + + (* Definition of multivariable polynomials with coefficients in C : + Type [Pol] represents [X1 ... Xn]. + The representation is Horner's where a [n] variable polynomial + (C[X1..Xn]) is seen as a polynomial on [X1] which coefficients + are polynomials with [n-1] variables (C[X2..Xn]). + There are several optimisations to make the repr compacter: + - [Pc c] is the constant polynomial of value c + == c*X1^0*..*Xn^0 + - [Pinj j Q] is a polynomial constant w.r.t the [j] first variables. + variable indices are shifted of j in Q. + == X1^0 *..* Xj^0 * Q{X1 <- Xj+1;..; Xn-j <- Xn} + - [PX P i Q] is an optimised Horner form of P*X^i + Q + with P not the null polynomial + == P * X1^i + Q{X1 <- X2; ..; Xn-1 <- Xn} + + In addition: + - polynomials of the form (PX (PX P i (Pc 0)) j Q) are forbidden + since they can be represented by the simpler form (PX P (i+j) Q) + - (Pinj i (Pinj j P)) is (Pinj (i+j) P) + - (Pinj i (Pc c)) is (Pc c) + *) + + Inductive Pol : Type := + | Pc : C -> Pol + | Pinj : positive -> Pol -> Pol + | PX : Pol -> positive -> Pol -> Pol. + + Definition P0 := Pc cO. + Definition P1 := Pc cI. + + Fixpoint Peq (P P' : Pol) {struct P'} : bool := + match P, P' with + | Pc c, Pc c' => c ?=! c' + | Pinj j Q, Pinj j' Q' => + match Pcompare j j' Eq with + | Eq => Peq Q Q' + | _ => false + end + | PX P i Q, PX P' i' Q' => + match Pcompare i i' Eq with + | Eq => if Peq P P' then Peq Q Q' else false + | _ => false + end + | _, _ => false + end. + + Notation " P ?== P' " := (Peq P P'). + + Definition mkPinj j P := + match P with + | Pc _ => P + | Pinj j' Q => Pinj ((j + j'):positive) Q + | _ => Pinj j P + end. + + Definition mkPX P i Q := + match P with + | Pc c => if c ?=! cO then mkPinj xH Q else PX P i Q + | Pinj _ _ => PX P i Q + | PX P' i' Q' => if Q' ?== P0 then PX P' (i' + i) Q else PX P i Q + end. + + (** Opposite of addition *) + + Fixpoint Popp (P:Pol) : Pol := + match P with + | Pc c => Pc (-! c) + | Pinj j Q => Pinj j (Popp Q) + | PX P i Q => PX (Popp P) i (Popp Q) + end. + + Notation "-- P" := (Popp P). + + (** Addition et subtraction *) + + Fixpoint PaddC (P:Pol) (c:C) {struct P} : Pol := + match P with + | Pc c1 => Pc (c1 +! c) + | Pinj j Q => Pinj j (PaddC Q c) + | PX P i Q => PX P i (PaddC Q c) + end. + + Fixpoint PsubC (P:Pol) (c:C) {struct P} : Pol := + match P with + | Pc c1 => Pc (c1 -! c) + | Pinj j Q => Pinj j (PsubC Q c) + | PX P i Q => PX P i (PsubC Q c) + end. + + Section PopI. + + Variable Pop : Pol -> Pol -> Pol. + Variable Q : Pol. + + Fixpoint PaddI (j:positive) (P:Pol){struct P} : Pol := + match P with + | Pc c => mkPinj j (PaddC Q c) + | Pinj j' Q' => + match ZPminus j' j with + | Zpos k => mkPinj j (Pop (Pinj k Q') Q) + | Z0 => mkPinj j (Pop Q' Q) + | Zneg k => mkPinj j' (PaddI k Q') + end + | PX P i Q' => + match j with + | xH => PX P i (Pop Q' Q) + | xO j => PX P i (PaddI (Pdouble_minus_one j) Q') + | xI j => PX P i (PaddI (xO j) Q') + end + end. + + Fixpoint PsubI (j:positive) (P:Pol){struct P} : Pol := + match P with + | Pc c => mkPinj j (PaddC (--Q) c) + | Pinj j' Q' => + match ZPminus j' j with + | Zpos k => mkPinj j (Pop (Pinj k Q') Q) + | Z0 => mkPinj j (Pop Q' Q) + | Zneg k => mkPinj j' (PsubI k Q') + end + | PX P i Q' => + match j with + | xH => PX P i (Pop Q' Q) + | xO j => PX P i (PsubI (Pdouble_minus_one j) Q') + | xI j => PX P i (PsubI (xO j) Q') + end + end. + + Variable P' : Pol. + + Fixpoint PaddX (i':positive) (P:Pol) {struct P} : Pol := + match P with + | Pc c => PX P' i' P + | Pinj j Q' => + match j with + | xH => PX P' i' Q' + | xO j => PX P' i' (Pinj (Pdouble_minus_one j) Q') + | xI j => PX P' i' (Pinj (xO j) Q') + end + | PX P i Q' => + match ZPminus i i' with + | Zpos k => mkPX (Pop (PX P k P0) P') i' Q' + | Z0 => mkPX (Pop P P') i Q' + | Zneg k => mkPX (PaddX k P) i Q' + end + end. + + Fixpoint PsubX (i':positive) (P:Pol) {struct P} : Pol := + match P with + | Pc c => PX (--P') i' P + | Pinj j Q' => + match j with + | xH => PX (--P') i' Q' + | xO j => PX (--P') i' (Pinj (Pdouble_minus_one j) Q') + | xI j => PX (--P') i' (Pinj (xO j) Q') + end + | PX P i Q' => + match ZPminus i i' with + | Zpos k => mkPX (Pop (PX P k P0) P') i' Q' + | Z0 => mkPX (Pop P P') i Q' + | Zneg k => mkPX (PsubX k P) i Q' + end + end. + + + End PopI. + + Fixpoint Padd (P P': Pol) {struct P'} : Pol := + match P' with + | Pc c' => PaddC P c' + | Pinj j' Q' => PaddI Padd Q' j' P + | PX P' i' Q' => + match P with + | Pc c => PX P' i' (PaddC Q' c) + | Pinj j Q => + match j with + | xH => PX P' i' (Padd Q Q') + | xO j => PX P' i' (Padd (Pinj (Pdouble_minus_one j) Q) Q') + | xI j => PX P' i' (Padd (Pinj (xO j) Q) Q') + end + | PX P i Q => + match ZPminus i i' with + | Zpos k => mkPX (Padd (PX P k P0) P') i' (Padd Q Q') + | Z0 => mkPX (Padd P P') i (Padd Q Q') + | Zneg k => mkPX (PaddX Padd P' k P) i (Padd Q Q') + end + end + end. + Notation "P ++ P'" := (Padd P P'). + + Fixpoint Psub (P P': Pol) {struct P'} : Pol := + match P' with + | Pc c' => PsubC P c' + | Pinj j' Q' => PsubI Psub Q' j' P + | PX P' i' Q' => + match P with + | Pc c => PX (--P') i' (*(--(PsubC Q' c))*) (PaddC (--Q') c) + | Pinj j Q => + match j with + | xH => PX (--P') i' (Psub Q Q') + | xO j => PX (--P') i' (Psub (Pinj (Pdouble_minus_one j) Q) Q') + | xI j => PX (--P') i' (Psub (Pinj (xO j) Q) Q') + end + | PX P i Q => + match ZPminus i i' with + | Zpos k => mkPX (Psub (PX P k P0) P') i' (Psub Q Q') + | Z0 => mkPX (Psub P P') i (Psub Q Q') + | Zneg k => mkPX (PsubX Psub P' k P) i (Psub Q Q') + end + end + end. + Notation "P -- P'" := (Psub P P'). + + (** Multiplication *) + + Fixpoint PmulC_aux (P:Pol) (c:C) {struct P} : Pol := + match P with + | Pc c' => Pc (c' *! c) + | Pinj j Q => mkPinj j (PmulC_aux Q c) + | PX P i Q => mkPX (PmulC_aux P c) i (PmulC_aux Q c) + end. + + Definition PmulC P c := + if c ?=! cO then P0 else + if c ?=! cI then P else PmulC_aux P c. + + Section PmulI. + Variable Pmul : Pol -> Pol -> Pol. + Variable Q : Pol. + Fixpoint PmulI (j:positive) (P:Pol) {struct P} : Pol := + match P with + | Pc c => mkPinj j (PmulC Q c) + | Pinj j' Q' => + match ZPminus j' j with + | Zpos k => mkPinj j (Pmul (Pinj k Q') Q) + | Z0 => mkPinj j (Pmul Q' Q) + | Zneg k => mkPinj j' (PmulI k Q') + end + | PX P' i' Q' => + match j with + | xH => mkPX (PmulI xH P') i' (Pmul Q' Q) + | xO j' => mkPX (PmulI j P') i' (PmulI (Pdouble_minus_one j') Q') + | xI j' => mkPX (PmulI j P') i' (PmulI (xO j') Q') + end + end. + + End PmulI. + + Fixpoint Pmul_aux (P P' : Pol) {struct P'} : Pol := + match P' with + | Pc c' => PmulC P c' + | Pinj j' Q' => PmulI Pmul_aux Q' j' P + | PX P' i' Q' => + (mkPX (Pmul_aux P P') i' P0) ++ (PmulI Pmul_aux Q' xH P) + end. + + Definition Pmul P P' := + match P with + | Pc c => PmulC P' c + | Pinj j Q => PmulI Pmul_aux Q j P' + | PX P i Q => + Padd (mkPX (Pmul_aux P P') i P0) (PmulI Pmul_aux Q xH P') + end. + Notation "P ** P'" := (Pmul P P'). + + (** Evaluation of a polynomial towards R *) + + Fixpoint pow (x:R) (i:positive) {struct i}: R := + match i with + | xH => x + | xO i => let p := pow x i in p * p + | xI i => let p := pow x i in x * p * p + end. + + Fixpoint Pphi(l:list R) (P:Pol) {struct P} : R := + match P with + | Pc c => [c] + | Pinj j Q => Pphi (jump j l) Q + | PX P i Q => + let x := hd 0 l in + let xi := pow x i in + (Pphi l P) * xi + (Pphi (tl l) Q) + end. + + Reserved Notation "P @ l " (at level 10, no associativity). + Notation "P @ l " := (Pphi l P). + (** Proofs *) + Lemma ZPminus_spec : forall x y, + match ZPminus x y with + | Z0 => x = y + | Zpos k => x = (y + k)%positive + | Zneg k => y = (x + k)%positive + end. + Proof. + induction x;destruct y. + replace (ZPminus (xI x) (xI y)) with (Zdouble (ZPminus x y));trivial. + assert (H := IHx y);destruct (ZPminus x y);unfold Zdouble;rewrite H;trivial. + replace (ZPminus (xI x) (xO y)) with (Zdouble_plus_one (ZPminus x y));trivial. + assert (H := IHx y);destruct (ZPminus x y);unfold Zdouble_plus_one;rewrite H;trivial. + apply Pplus_xI_double_minus_one. + simpl;trivial. + replace (ZPminus (xO x) (xI y)) with (Zdouble_minus_one (ZPminus x y));trivial. + assert (H := IHx y);destruct (ZPminus x y);unfold Zdouble_minus_one;rewrite H;trivial. + apply Pplus_xI_double_minus_one. + replace (ZPminus (xO x) (xO y)) with (Zdouble (ZPminus x y));trivial. + assert (H := IHx y);destruct (ZPminus x y);unfold Zdouble;rewrite H;trivial. + replace (ZPminus (xO x) xH) with (Zpos (Pdouble_minus_one x));trivial. + rewrite <- Pplus_one_succ_l. + rewrite Psucc_o_double_minus_one_eq_xO;trivial. + replace (ZPminus xH (xI y)) with (Zneg (xO y));trivial. + replace (ZPminus xH (xO y)) with (Zneg (Pdouble_minus_one y));trivial. + rewrite <- Pplus_one_succ_l. + rewrite Psucc_o_double_minus_one_eq_xO;trivial. + simpl;trivial. + Qed. + + Lemma pow_Psucc : forall x j, pow x (Psucc j) == x * pow x j. + Proof. + induction j;simpl;rsimpl. + rewrite IHj;rsimpl;mul_push x;rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma pow_Pplus : forall x i j, pow x (i + j) == pow x i * pow x j. + Proof. + intro x;induction i;intros. + rewrite xI_succ_xO;rewrite Pplus_one_succ_r. + rewrite <- Pplus_diag;repeat rewrite <- Pplus_assoc. + repeat rewrite IHi. + rewrite Pplus_comm;rewrite <- Pplus_one_succ_r;rewrite pow_Psucc. + simpl;rsimpl. + rewrite <- Pplus_diag;repeat rewrite <- Pplus_assoc. + repeat rewrite IHi;rsimpl. + rewrite Pplus_comm;rewrite <- Pplus_one_succ_r;rewrite pow_Psucc; + simpl;rsimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma Peq_ok : forall P P', + (P ?== P') = true -> forall l, P@l == P'@ l. + Proof. + induction P;destruct P';simpl;intros;try discriminate;trivial. + apply (morph_eq CRmorph);trivial. + assert (H1 := Pcompare_Eq_eq p p0); destruct ((p ?= p0)%positive Eq); + try discriminate H. + rewrite (IHP P' H); rewrite H1;trivial;rrefl. + assert (H1 := Pcompare_Eq_eq p p0); destruct ((p ?= p0)%positive Eq); + try discriminate H. + rewrite H1;trivial. clear H1. + assert (H1 := IHP1 P'1);assert (H2 := IHP2 P'2); + destruct (P2 ?== P'1);[destruct (P3 ?== P'2); [idtac|discriminate H] + |discriminate H]. + rewrite (H1 H);rewrite (H2 H);rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma Pphi0 : forall l, P0@l == 0. + Proof. + intros;simpl;apply (morph0 CRmorph). + Qed. + + Lemma Pphi1 : forall l, P1@l == 1. + Proof. + intros;simpl;apply (morph1 CRmorph). + Qed. + + Lemma mkPinj_ok : forall j l P, (mkPinj j P)@l == P@(jump j l). + Proof. + intros j l p;destruct p;simpl;rsimpl. + rewrite <-jump_Pplus;rewrite Pplus_comm;rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma mkPX_ok : forall l P i Q, + (mkPX P i Q)@l == P@l*(pow (hd 0 l) i) + Q@(tl l). + Proof. + intros l P i Q;unfold mkPX. + destruct P;try (simpl;rrefl). + assert (H := morph_eq CRmorph c cO);destruct (c ?=! cO);simpl;try rrefl. + rewrite (H (refl_equal true));rewrite (morph0 CRmorph). + rewrite mkPinj_ok;rsimpl;simpl;rrefl. + assert (H := @Peq_ok P3 P0);destruct (P3 ?== P0);simpl;try rrefl. + rewrite (H (refl_equal true));trivial. + rewrite Pphi0;rewrite pow_Pplus;rsimpl. + Qed. + + Ltac Esimpl := + repeat (progress ( + match goal with + | |- context [P0@?l] => rewrite (Pphi0 l) + | |- context [P1@?l] => rewrite (Pphi1 l) + | |- context [(mkPinj ?j ?P)@?l] => rewrite (mkPinj_ok j l P) + | |- context [(mkPX ?P ?i ?Q)@?l] => rewrite (mkPX_ok l P i Q) + | |- context [[cO]] => rewrite (morph0 CRmorph) + | |- context [[cI]] => rewrite (morph1 CRmorph) + | |- context [[?x +! ?y]] => rewrite ((morph_add CRmorph) x y) + | |- context [[?x *! ?y]] => rewrite ((morph_mul CRmorph) x y) + | |- context [[?x -! ?y]] => rewrite ((morph_sub CRmorph) x y) + | |- context [[-! ?x]] => rewrite ((morph_opp CRmorph) x) + end)); + rsimpl; simpl. + + Lemma PaddC_ok : forall c P l, (PaddC P c)@l == P@l + [c]. + Proof. + induction P;simpl;intros;Esimpl;trivial. + rewrite IHP2;rsimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma PsubC_ok : forall c P l, (PsubC P c)@l == P@l - [c]. + Proof. + induction P;simpl;intros. + Esimpl. + rewrite IHP;rsimpl. + rewrite IHP2;rsimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma PmulC_aux_ok : forall c P l, (PmulC_aux P c)@l == P@l * [c]. + Proof. + induction P;simpl;intros;Esimpl;trivial. + rewrite IHP1;rewrite IHP2;rsimpl. + mul_push ([c]);rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma PmulC_ok : forall c P l, (PmulC P c)@l == P@l * [c]. + Proof. + intros c P l; unfold PmulC. + assert (H:= morph_eq CRmorph c cO);destruct (c ?=! cO). + rewrite (H (refl_equal true));Esimpl. + assert (H1:= morph_eq CRmorph c cI);destruct (c ?=! cI). + rewrite (H1 (refl_equal true));Esimpl. + apply PmulC_aux_ok. + Qed. + + Lemma Popp_ok : forall P l, (--P)@l == - P@l. + Proof. + induction P;simpl;intros. + Esimpl. + apply IHP. + rewrite IHP1;rewrite IHP2;rsimpl. + Qed. + + Ltac Esimpl2 := + Esimpl; + repeat (progress ( + match goal with + | |- context [(PaddC ?P ?c)@?l] => rewrite (PaddC_ok c P l) + | |- context [(PsubC ?P ?c)@?l] => rewrite (PsubC_ok c P l) + | |- context [(PmulC ?P ?c)@?l] => rewrite (PmulC_ok c P l) + | |- context [(--?P)@?l] => rewrite (Popp_ok P l) + end)); Esimpl. + + Lemma Padd_ok : forall P' P l, (P ++ P')@l == P@l + P'@l. + Proof. + induction P';simpl;intros;Esimpl2. + generalize P p l;clear P p l. + induction P;simpl;intros. + Esimpl2;apply (ARadd_sym ARth). + assert (H := ZPminus_spec p p0);destruct (ZPminus p p0). + rewrite H;Esimpl. rewrite IHP';rrefl. + rewrite H;Esimpl. rewrite IHP';Esimpl. + rewrite <- jump_Pplus;rewrite Pplus_comm;rrefl. + rewrite H;Esimpl. rewrite IHP. + rewrite <- jump_Pplus;rewrite Pplus_comm;rrefl. + destruct p0;simpl. + rewrite IHP2;simpl;rsimpl. + rewrite IHP2;simpl. + rewrite jump_Pdouble_minus_one;rsimpl. + rewrite IHP';rsimpl. + destruct P;simpl. + Esimpl2;add_push [c];rrefl. + destruct p0;simpl;Esimpl2. + rewrite IHP'2;simpl. + rsimpl;add_push (P'1@l * (pow (hd 0 l) p));rrefl. + rewrite IHP'2;simpl. + rewrite jump_Pdouble_minus_one;rsimpl;add_push (P'1@l * (pow (hd 0 l) p));rrefl. + rewrite IHP'2;rsimpl. add_push (P @ (tl l));rrefl. + assert (H := ZPminus_spec p0 p);destruct (ZPminus p0 p);Esimpl2. + rewrite IHP'1;rewrite IHP'2;rsimpl. + add_push (P3 @ (tl l));rewrite H;rrefl. + rewrite IHP'1;rewrite IHP'2;simpl;Esimpl. + rewrite H;rewrite Pplus_comm. + rewrite pow_Pplus;rsimpl. + add_push (P3 @ (tl l));rrefl. + assert (forall P k l, + (PaddX Padd P'1 k P) @ l == P@l + P'1@l * pow (hd 0 l) k). + induction P;simpl;intros;try apply (ARadd_sym ARth). + destruct p2;simpl;try apply (ARadd_sym ARth). + rewrite jump_Pdouble_minus_one;apply (ARadd_sym ARth). + assert (H1 := ZPminus_spec p2 k);destruct (ZPminus p2 k);Esimpl2. + rewrite IHP'1;rsimpl; rewrite H1;add_push (P5 @ (tl l0));rrefl. + rewrite IHP'1;simpl;Esimpl. + rewrite H1;rewrite Pplus_comm. + rewrite pow_Pplus;simpl;Esimpl. + add_push (P5 @ (tl l0));rrefl. + rewrite IHP1;rewrite H1;rewrite Pplus_comm. + rewrite pow_Pplus;simpl;rsimpl. + add_push (P5 @ (tl l0));rrefl. + rewrite H0;rsimpl. + add_push (P3 @ (tl l)). + rewrite H;rewrite Pplus_comm. + rewrite IHP'2;rewrite pow_Pplus;rsimpl. + add_push (P3 @ (tl l));rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma Psub_ok : forall P' P l, (P -- P')@l == P@l - P'@l. + Proof. + induction P';simpl;intros;Esimpl2;trivial. + generalize P p l;clear P p l. + induction P;simpl;intros. + Esimpl2;apply (ARadd_sym ARth). + assert (H := ZPminus_spec p p0);destruct (ZPminus p p0). + rewrite H;Esimpl. rewrite IHP';rsimpl. + rewrite H;Esimpl. rewrite IHP';Esimpl. + rewrite <- jump_Pplus;rewrite Pplus_comm;rrefl. + rewrite H;Esimpl. rewrite IHP. + rewrite <- jump_Pplus;rewrite Pplus_comm;rrefl. + destruct p0;simpl. + rewrite IHP2;simpl;rsimpl. + rewrite IHP2;simpl. + rewrite jump_Pdouble_minus_one;rsimpl. + rewrite IHP';rsimpl. + destruct P;simpl. + repeat rewrite Popp_ok;Esimpl2;rsimpl;add_push [c];try rrefl. + destruct p0;simpl;Esimpl2. + rewrite IHP'2;simpl;rsimpl;add_push (P'1@l * (pow (hd 0 l) p));trivial. + add_push (P @ (jump p0 (jump p0 (tl l))));rrefl. + rewrite IHP'2;simpl;rewrite jump_Pdouble_minus_one;rsimpl. + add_push (- (P'1 @ l * pow (hd 0 l) p));rrefl. + rewrite IHP'2;rsimpl;add_push (P @ (tl l));rrefl. + assert (H := ZPminus_spec p0 p);destruct (ZPminus p0 p);Esimpl2. + rewrite IHP'1; rewrite IHP'2;rsimpl. + add_push (P3 @ (tl l));rewrite H;rrefl. + rewrite IHP'1; rewrite IHP'2;rsimpl;simpl;Esimpl. + rewrite H;rewrite Pplus_comm. + rewrite pow_Pplus;rsimpl. + add_push (P3 @ (tl l));rrefl. + assert (forall P k l, + (PsubX Psub P'1 k P) @ l == P@l + - P'1@l * pow (hd 0 l) k). + induction P;simpl;intros. + rewrite Popp_ok;rsimpl;apply (ARadd_sym ARth);trivial. + destruct p2;simpl;rewrite Popp_ok;rsimpl. + apply (ARadd_sym ARth);trivial. + rewrite jump_Pdouble_minus_one;apply (ARadd_sym ARth);trivial. + apply (ARadd_sym ARth);trivial. + assert (H1 := ZPminus_spec p2 k);destruct (ZPminus p2 k);Esimpl2;rsimpl. + rewrite IHP'1;rsimpl;add_push (P5 @ (tl l0));rewrite H1;rrefl. + rewrite IHP'1;rewrite H1;rewrite Pplus_comm. + rewrite pow_Pplus;simpl;Esimpl. + add_push (P5 @ (tl l0));rrefl. + rewrite IHP1;rewrite H1;rewrite Pplus_comm. + rewrite pow_Pplus;simpl;rsimpl. + add_push (P5 @ (tl l0));rrefl. + rewrite H0;rsimpl. + rewrite IHP'2;rsimpl;add_push (P3 @ (tl l)). + rewrite H;rewrite Pplus_comm. + rewrite pow_Pplus;rsimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma PmulI_ok : + forall P', + (forall (P : Pol) (l : list R), (Pmul_aux P P') @ l == P @ l * P' @ l) -> + forall (P : Pol) (p : positive) (l : list R), + (PmulI Pmul_aux P' p P) @ l == P @ l * P' @ (jump p l). + Proof. + induction P;simpl;intros. + Esimpl2;apply (ARmul_sym ARth). + assert (H1 := ZPminus_spec p p0);destruct (ZPminus p p0);Esimpl2. + rewrite H1; rewrite H;rrefl. + rewrite H1; rewrite H. + rewrite Pplus_comm. + rewrite jump_Pplus;simpl;rrefl. + rewrite H1;rewrite Pplus_comm. + rewrite jump_Pplus;rewrite IHP;rrefl. + destruct p0;Esimpl2. + rewrite IHP1;rewrite IHP2;simpl;rsimpl. + mul_push (pow (hd 0 l) p);rrefl. + rewrite IHP1;rewrite IHP2;simpl;rsimpl. + mul_push (pow (hd 0 l) p); rewrite jump_Pdouble_minus_one;rrefl. + rewrite IHP1;simpl;rsimpl. + mul_push (pow (hd 0 l) p). + rewrite H;rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma Pmul_aux_ok : forall P' P l,(Pmul_aux P P')@l == P@l * P'@l. + Proof. + induction P';simpl;intros. + Esimpl2;trivial. + apply PmulI_ok;trivial. + rewrite Padd_ok;Esimpl2. + rewrite (PmulI_ok P'2 IHP'2). rewrite IHP'1. rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma Pmul_ok : forall P P' l, (P**P')@l == P@l * P'@l. + Proof. + destruct P;simpl;intros. + Esimpl2;apply (ARmul_sym ARth). + rewrite (PmulI_ok P (Pmul_aux_ok P)). + apply (ARmul_sym ARth). + rewrite Padd_ok; Esimpl2. + rewrite (PmulI_ok P3 (Pmul_aux_ok P3));trivial. + rewrite Pmul_aux_ok;mul_push (P' @ l). + rewrite (ARmul_sym ARth (P' @ l));rrefl. + Qed. + + (** Definition of polynomial expressions *) + + Inductive PExpr : Type := + | PEc : C -> PExpr + | PEX : positive -> PExpr + | PEadd : PExpr -> PExpr -> PExpr + | PEsub : PExpr -> PExpr -> PExpr + | PEmul : PExpr -> PExpr -> PExpr + | PEopp : PExpr -> PExpr. + + (** normalisation towards polynomials *) + + Definition X := (PX P1 xH P0). + + Definition mkX j := + match j with + | xH => X + | xO j => Pinj (Pdouble_minus_one j) X + | xI j => Pinj (xO j) X + end. + + Fixpoint norm (pe:PExpr) : Pol := + match pe with + | PEc c => Pc c + | PEX j => mkX j + | PEadd pe1 (PEopp pe2) => Psub (norm pe1) (norm pe2) + | PEadd (PEopp pe1) pe2 => Psub (norm pe2) (norm pe1) + | PEadd pe1 pe2 => Padd (norm pe1) (norm pe2) + | PEsub pe1 pe2 => Psub (norm pe1) (norm pe2) + | PEmul pe1 pe2 => Pmul (norm pe1) (norm pe2) + | PEopp pe1 => Popp (norm pe1) + end. + + (** evaluation of polynomial expressions towards R *) + + Fixpoint PEeval (l:list R) (pe:PExpr) {struct pe} : R := + match pe with + | PEc c => phi c + | PEX j => nth 0 j l + | PEadd pe1 pe2 => (PEeval l pe1) + (PEeval l pe2) + | PEsub pe1 pe2 => (PEeval l pe1) - (PEeval l pe2) + | PEmul pe1 pe2 => (PEeval l pe1) * (PEeval l pe2) + | PEopp pe1 => - (PEeval l pe1) + end. + + (** Correctness proofs *) + + + Lemma mkX_ok : forall p l, nth 0 p l == (mkX p) @ l. + Proof. + destruct p;simpl;intros;Esimpl;trivial. + rewrite <-jump_tl;rewrite nth_jump;rrefl. + rewrite <- nth_jump. + rewrite nth_Pdouble_minus_one;rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma norm_PEopp : forall l pe, (norm (PEopp pe))@l == -(norm pe)@l. + Proof. + intros;simpl;apply Popp_ok. + Qed. + + Ltac Esimpl3 := + repeat match goal with + | |- context [(?P1 ++ ?P2)@?l] => rewrite (Padd_ok P2 P1 l) + | |- context [(?P1 -- ?P2)@?l] => rewrite (Psub_ok P2 P1 l) + | |- context [(norm (PEopp ?pe))@?l] => rewrite (norm_PEopp l pe) + end;Esimpl2;try rrefl;try apply (ARadd_sym ARth). + + Lemma norm_ok : forall l pe, PEeval l pe == (norm pe)@l. + Proof. + induction pe;simpl;Esimpl3. + apply mkX_ok. + rewrite IHpe1;rewrite IHpe2; destruct pe1;destruct pe2;Esimpl3. + rewrite IHpe1;rewrite IHpe2;rrefl. + rewrite Pmul_ok;rewrite IHpe1;rewrite IHpe2;rrefl. + rewrite IHpe;rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma ring_correct : forall l pe1 pe2, + ((norm pe1) ?== (norm pe2)) = true -> (PEeval l pe1) == (PEeval l pe2). + Proof. + intros l pe1 pe2 H. + repeat rewrite norm_ok. + apply (Peq_ok (norm pe1) (norm pe2) H l). + Qed. + +(** Evaluation function avoiding parentheses *) + Fixpoint mkmult (r:R) (lm:list R) {struct lm}: R := + match lm with + | nil => r + | cons h t => mkmult (r*h) t + end. + + Definition mkadd_mult rP lm := + match lm with + | nil => rP + 1 + | cons h t => rP + mkmult h t + end. + + Fixpoint powl (i:positive) (x:R) (l:list R) {struct i}: list R := + match i with + | xH => cons x l + | xO i => powl i x (powl i x l) + | xI i => powl i x (powl i x (cons x l)) + end. + + Fixpoint add_mult_dev (rP:R) (P:Pol) (fv lm:list R) {struct P} : R := + (* rP + P@l * lm *) + match P with + | Pc c => if c ?=! cI then mkadd_mult rP (rev lm) + else mkadd_mult rP (cons [c] (rev lm)) + | Pinj j Q => add_mult_dev rP Q (jump j fv) lm + | PX P i Q => + let rP := add_mult_dev rP P fv (powl i (hd 0 fv) lm) in + if Q ?== P0 then rP else add_mult_dev rP Q (tl fv) lm + end. + + Definition mkmult1 lm := + match lm with + | nil => rI + | cons h t => mkmult h t + end. + + Fixpoint mult_dev (P:Pol) (fv lm : list R) {struct P} : R := + (* P@l * lm *) + match P with + | Pc c => if c ?=! cI then mkmult1 (rev lm) else mkmult [c] (rev lm) + | Pinj j Q => mult_dev Q (jump j fv) lm + | PX P i Q => + let rP := mult_dev P fv (powl i (hd 0 fv) lm) in + if Q ?== P0 then rP else add_mult_dev rP Q (tl fv) lm + end. + + Definition Pphi_dev fv P := mult_dev P fv (nil R). + + Add Morphism mkmult : mkmult_ext. + intros r r0 eqr l;generalize l r r0 eqr;clear l r r0 eqr; + induction l;simpl;intros. + trivial. apply IHl; rewrite eqr;rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma mul_mkmult : forall lm r1 r2, r1 * mkmult r2 lm == mkmult (r1*r2) lm. + Proof. + induction lm;simpl;intros;try rrefl. + rewrite IHlm. + setoid_replace (r1 * (r2 * a)) with (r1 * r2 * a);Esimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma mkmult1_mkmult : forall lm r, r * mkmult1 lm == mkmult r lm. + Proof. + destruct lm;simpl;intros. Esimpl. + apply mul_mkmult. + Qed. + + Lemma mkmult1_mkmult_1 : forall lm, mkmult1 lm == mkmult 1 lm. + Proof. + intros;rewrite <- mkmult1_mkmult;Esimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma mkmult_rev_append : forall lm l r, + mkmult r (rev_append l lm) == mkmult (mkmult r l) lm. + Proof. + induction lm; simpl in |- *; intros. + rrefl. + rewrite IHlm; simpl in |- *. + repeat rewrite <- (ARmul_sym ARth a); rewrite <- mul_mkmult. + rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma powl_mkmult_rev : forall p r x lm, + mkmult r (rev (powl p x lm)) == mkmult (pow x p * r) (rev lm). + Proof. + induction p;simpl;intros. + repeat rewrite IHp. + unfold rev;simpl. + repeat rewrite mkmult_rev_append. + simpl. + setoid_replace (pow x p * (pow x p * r) * x) + with (x * pow x p * pow x p * r);Esimpl. + mul_push x;rrefl. + repeat rewrite IHp. + setoid_replace (pow x p * (pow x p * r) ) + with (pow x p * pow x p * r);Esimpl. + unfold rev;simpl. repeat rewrite mkmult_rev_append;simpl. + rewrite (ARmul_sym ARth);rrefl. + Qed. + + Lemma Pphi_add_mult_dev : forall P rP fv lm, + rP + P@fv * mkmult1 (rev lm) == add_mult_dev rP P fv lm. + Proof. + induction P;simpl;intros. + assert (H := (morph_eq CRmorph) c cI). + destruct (c ?=! cI). + rewrite (H (refl_equal true));rewrite (morph1 CRmorph);Esimpl. + destruct (rev lm);Esimpl;rrefl. + rewrite mkmult1_mkmult;rrefl. + apply IHP. + replace (match P3 with + | Pc c => c ?=! cO + | Pinj _ _ => false + | PX _ _ _ => false + end) with (Peq P3 P0);trivial. + assert (H := Peq_ok P3 P0). + destruct (P3 ?== P0). + rewrite (H (refl_equal true));simpl;Esimpl. + rewrite <- IHP1. + repeat rewrite mkmult1_mkmult_1. + rewrite powl_mkmult_rev. + rewrite <- mul_mkmult;Esimpl. + rewrite <- IHP2. + rewrite <- IHP1. + repeat rewrite mkmult1_mkmult_1. + rewrite powl_mkmult_rev. + rewrite <- mul_mkmult;Esimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma Pphi_mult_dev : forall P fv lm, + P@fv * mkmult1 (rev lm) == mult_dev P fv lm. + Proof. + induction P;simpl;intros. + assert (H := (morph_eq CRmorph) c cI). + destruct (c ?=! cI). + rewrite (H (refl_equal true));rewrite (morph1 CRmorph);Esimpl. + apply mkmult1_mkmult. + apply IHP. + replace (match P3 with + | Pc c => c ?=! cO + | Pinj _ _ => false + | PX _ _ _ => false + end) with (Peq P3 P0);trivial. + assert (H := Peq_ok P3 P0). + destruct (P3 ?== P0). + rewrite (H (refl_equal true));simpl;Esimpl. + rewrite <- IHP1. + repeat rewrite mkmult1_mkmult_1. + rewrite powl_mkmult_rev. + rewrite <- mul_mkmult;Esimpl. + rewrite <- Pphi_add_mult_dev. + rewrite <- IHP1. + repeat rewrite mkmult1_mkmult_1. + rewrite powl_mkmult_rev. + rewrite <- mul_mkmult;Esimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma Pphi_Pphi_dev : forall P l, P@l == Pphi_dev l P. + Proof. + unfold Pphi_dev;intros. + rewrite <- Pphi_mult_dev;simpl;Esimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma Pphi_dev_ok : forall l pe, PEeval l pe == Pphi_dev l (norm pe). + Proof. + intros l pe;rewrite <- Pphi_Pphi_dev;apply norm_ok. + Qed. + + Lemma Pphi_dev_ok' : + forall l pe npe, norm pe = npe -> PEeval l pe == Pphi_dev l npe. + Proof. + intros l pe npe npe_eq; subst npe; apply Pphi_dev_ok. + Qed. + +(* The same but building a PExpr *) +(* + Fixpoint Pmkmult (r:PExpr) (lm:list PExpr) {struct lm}: PExpr := + match lm with + | nil => r + | cons h t => Pmkmult (PEmul r h) t + end. + + Definition Pmkadd_mult rP lm := + match lm with + | nil => PEadd rP (PEc cI) + | cons h t => PEadd rP (Pmkmult h t) + end. + + Fixpoint Ppowl (i:positive) (x:PExpr) (l:list PExpr) {struct i}: list PExpr := + match i with + | xH => cons x l + | xO i => Ppowl i x (Ppowl i x l) + | xI i => Ppowl i x (Ppowl i x (cons x l)) + end. + + Fixpoint Padd_mult_dev + (rP:PExpr) (P:Pol) (fv lm:list PExpr) {struct P} : PExpr := + (* rP + P@l * lm *) + match P with + | Pc c => if c ?=! cI then Pmkadd_mult rP (rev lm) + else Pmkadd_mult rP (cons [PEc c] (rev lm)) + | Pinj j Q => Padd_mult_dev rP Q (jump j fv) lm + | PX P i Q => + let rP := Padd_mult_dev rP P fv (Ppowl i (hd P0 fv) lm) in + if Q ?== P0 then rP else Padd_mult_dev rP Q (tl fv) lm + end. + + Definition Pmkmult1 lm := + match lm with + | nil => PEc cI + | cons h t => Pmkmult h t + end. + + Fixpoint Pmult_dev (P:Pol) (fv lm : list PExpr) {struct P} : PExpr := + (* P@l * lm *) + match P with + | Pc c => if c ?=! cI then Pmkmult1 (rev lm) else Pmkmult [PEc c] (rev lm) + | Pinj j Q => Pmult_dev Q (jump j fv) lm + | PX P i Q => + let rP := Pmult_dev P fv (Ppowl i (hd (PEc r0) fv) lm) in + if Q ?== P0 then rP else Padd_mult_dev rP Q (tl fv) lm + end. + + Definition Pphi_dev2 fv P := Pmult_dev P fv (nil PExpr). + +... +*) + (************************************************) + (* avec des parentheses mais un peu plus efficace *) + + + (************************************************** + + Fixpoint pow_mult (i:positive) (x r:R){struct i}:R := + match i with + | xH => r * x + | xO i => pow_mult i x (pow_mult i x r) + | xI i => pow_mult i x (pow_mult i x (r * x)) + end. + + Definition pow_dev i x := + match i with + | xH => x + | xO i => pow_mult (Pdouble_minus_one i) x x + | xI i => pow_mult (xO i) x x + end. + + Lemma pow_mult_pow : forall i x r, pow_mult i x r == pow x i * r. + Proof. + induction i;simpl;intros. + rewrite (IHi x (pow_mult i x (r * x)));rewrite (IHi x (r*x));rsimpl. + mul_push x;rrefl. + rewrite (IHi x (pow_mult i x r));rewrite (IHi x r);rsimpl. + apply ARth.(ARmul_sym). + Qed. + + Lemma pow_dev_pow : forall p x, pow_dev p x == pow x p. + Proof. + destruct p;simpl;intros. + rewrite (pow_mult_pow p x (pow_mult p x x)). + rewrite (pow_mult_pow p x x);rsimpl;mul_push x;rrefl. + rewrite (pow_mult_pow (Pdouble_minus_one p) x x). + rewrite (ARth.(ARmul_sym) (pow x (Pdouble_minus_one p)) x). + rewrite <- (pow_Psucc x (Pdouble_minus_one p)). + rewrite Psucc_o_double_minus_one_eq_xO;simpl; rrefl. + rrefl. + Qed. + + Fixpoint Pphi_dev (fv:list R) (P:Pol) {struct P} : R := + match P with + | Pc c => [c] + | Pinj j Q => Pphi_dev (jump j fv) Q + | PX P i Q => + let rP := mult_dev P fv (pow_dev i (hd 0 fv)) in + add_dev rP Q (tl fv) + end + + with add_dev (ra:R) (P:Pol) (fv:list R) {struct P} : R := + match P with + | Pc c => if c ?=! cO then ra else ra + [c] + | Pinj j Q => add_dev ra Q (jump j fv) + | PX P i Q => + let ra := add_mult_dev ra P fv (pow_dev i (hd 0 fv)) in + add_dev ra Q (tl fv) + end + + with mult_dev (P:Pol) (fv:list R) (rm:R) {struct P} : R := + match P with + | Pc c => if c ?=! cI then rm else [c]*rm + | Pinj j Q => mult_dev Q (jump j fv) rm + | PX P i Q => + let ra := mult_dev P fv (pow_mult i (hd 0 fv) rm) in + add_mult_dev ra Q (tl fv) rm + end + + with add_mult_dev (ra:R) (P:Pol) (fv:list R) (rm:R) {struct P} : R := + match P with + | Pc c => if c ?=! cO then ra else ra + [c]*rm + | Pinj j Q => add_mult_dev ra Q (jump j fv) rm + | PX P i Q => + let rmP := pow_mult i (hd 0 fv) rm in + let raP := add_mult_dev ra P fv rmP in + add_mult_dev raP Q (tl fv) rm + end. + + Lemma Pphi_add_mult_dev : forall P ra fv rm, + add_mult_dev ra P fv rm == ra + P@fv * rm. + Proof. + induction P;simpl;intros. + assert (H := CRmorph.(morph_eq) c cO). + destruct (c ?=! cO). + rewrite (H (refl_equal true));rewrite CRmorph.(morph0);Esimpl. + rrefl. + apply IHP. + rewrite (IHP2 (add_mult_dev ra P2 fv (pow_mult p (hd 0 fv) rm)) (tl fv) rm). + rewrite (IHP1 ra fv (pow_mult p (hd 0 fv) rm)). + rewrite (pow_mult_pow p (hd 0 fv) rm);rsimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma Pphi_add_dev : forall P ra fv, add_dev ra P fv == ra + P@fv. + Proof. + induction P;simpl;intros. + assert (H := CRmorph.(morph_eq) c cO). + destruct (c ?=! cO). + rewrite (H (refl_equal true));rewrite CRmorph.(morph0);Esimpl. + rrefl. + apply IHP. + rewrite (IHP2 (add_mult_dev ra P2 fv (pow_dev p (hd 0 fv))) (tl fv)). + rewrite (Pphi_add_mult_dev P2 ra fv (pow_dev p (hd 0 fv))). + rewrite (pow_dev_pow p (hd 0 fv));rsimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma Pphi_mult_dev : forall P fv rm, mult_dev P fv rm == P@fv * rm. + Proof. + induction P;simpl;intros. + assert (H := CRmorph.(morph_eq) c cI). + destruct (c ?=! cI). + rewrite (H (refl_equal true));rewrite CRmorph.(morph1);Esimpl. + rrefl. + apply IHP. + rewrite (Pphi_add_mult_dev P3 + (mult_dev P2 fv (pow_mult p (hd 0 fv) rm)) (tl fv) rm). + rewrite (IHP1 fv (pow_mult p (hd 0 fv) rm)). + rewrite (pow_mult_pow p (hd 0 fv) rm);rsimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma Pphi_Pphi_dev : forall P fv, P@fv == Pphi_dev fv P. + Proof. + induction P;simpl;intros. + rrefl. trivial. + rewrite (Pphi_add_dev P3 (mult_dev P2 fv (pow_dev p (hd 0 fv))) (tl fv)). + rewrite (Pphi_mult_dev P2 fv (pow_dev p (hd 0 fv))). + rewrite (pow_dev_pow p (hd 0 fv));rsimpl. + Qed. + + Lemma Pphi_dev_ok : forall l pe, PEeval l pe == Pphi_dev l (norm pe). + Proof. + intros l pe;rewrite <- (Pphi_Pphi_dev (norm pe) l);apply norm_ok. + Qed. + + Ltac Trev l := + let rec rev_append rev l := + match l with + | (nil _) => constr:(rev) + | (cons ?h ?t) => let rev := constr:(cons h rev) in rev_append rev t + end in + rev_append (nil R) l. + + Ltac TPphi_dev add mul := + let tl l := match l with (cons ?h ?t) => constr:(t) end in + let rec jump j l := + match j with + | xH => tl l + | (xO ?j) => let l := jump j l in jump j l + | (xI ?j) => let t := tl l in let l := jump j l in jump j l + end in + let rec pow_mult i x r := + match i with + | xH => constr:(mul r x) + | (xO ?i) => let r := pow_mult i x r in pow_mult i x r + | (xI ?i) => + let r := constr:(mul r x) in + let r := pow_mult i x r in + pow_mult i x r + end in + let pow_dev i x := + match i with + | xH => x + | (xO ?i) => + let i := eval compute in (Pdouble_minus_one i) in pow_mult i x x + | (xI ?i) => pow_mult (xO i) x x + end in + let rec add_mult_dev ra P fv rm := + match P with + | (Pc ?c) => + match eval compute in (c ?=! cO) with + | true => constr:ra + | _ => let rc := eval compute in [c] in constr:(add ra (mul rc rm)) + end + | (Pinj ?j ?Q) => + let fv := jump j fv in add_mult_dev ra Q fv rm + | (PX ?P ?i ?Q) => + match fv with + | (cons ?hd ?tl) => + let rmP := pow_mult i hd rm in + let raP := add_mult_dev ra P fv rmP in + add_mult_dev raP Q tl rm + end + end in + let rec mult_dev P fv rm := + match P with + | (Pc ?c) => + match eval compute in (c ?=! cI) with + | true => constr:rm + | false => let rc := eval compute in [c] in constr:(mul rc rm) + end + | (Pinj ?j ?Q) => let fv := jump j fv in mult_dev Q fv rm + | (PX ?P ?i ?Q) => + match fv with + | (cons ?hd ?tl) => + let rmP := pow_mult i hd rm in + let ra := mult_dev P fv rmP in + add_mult_dev ra Q tl rm + end + end in + let rec add_dev ra P fv := + match P with + | (Pc ?c) => + match eval compute in (c ?=! cO) with + | true => ra + | false => let rc := eval compute in [c] in constr:(add ra rc) + end + | (Pinj ?j ?Q) => let fv := jump j fv in add_dev ra Q fv + | (PX ?P ?i ?Q) => + match fv with + | (cons ?hd ?tl) => + let rmP := pow_dev i hd in + let ra := add_mult_dev ra P fv rmP in + add_dev ra Q tl + end + end in + let rec Pphi_dev fv P := + match P with + | (Pc ?c) => eval compute in [c] + | (Pinj ?j ?Q) => let fv := jump j fv in Pphi_dev fv Q + | (PX ?P ?i ?Q) => + match fv with + | (cons ?hd ?tl) => + let rm := pow_dev i hd in + let rP := mult_dev P fv rm in + add_dev rP Q tl + end + end in + Pphi_dev. + + **************************************************************) + +End MakeRingPol. |