summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/proofs/pfedit.ml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGravatar Stephane Glondu <steph@glondu.net>2012-01-12 16:02:20 +0100
committerGravatar Stephane Glondu <steph@glondu.net>2012-01-12 16:02:20 +0100
commit97fefe1fcca363a1317e066e7f4b99b9c1e9987b (patch)
tree97ec6b7d831cc5fb66328b0c63a11db1cbb2f158 /proofs/pfedit.ml
parent300293c119981054c95182a90c829058530a6b6f (diff)
Imported Upstream version 8.4~betaupstream/8.4_beta
Diffstat (limited to 'proofs/pfedit.ml')
-rw-r--r--proofs/pfedit.ml424
1 files changed, 129 insertions, 295 deletions
diff --git a/proofs/pfedit.ml b/proofs/pfedit.ml
index a9799f38..3d507f35 100644
--- a/proofs/pfedit.ml
+++ b/proofs/pfedit.ml
@@ -1,13 +1,11 @@
(************************************************************************)
(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
-(* <O___,, * INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2011 *)
+(* <O___,, * INRIA - CNRS - LIX - LRI - PPS - Copyright 1999-2010 *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
-(* $Id: pfedit.ml 14641 2011-11-06 11:59:10Z herbelin $ *)
-
open Pp
open Util
open Names
@@ -20,322 +18,139 @@ open Environ
open Evd
open Typing
open Refiner
-open Proof_trees
open Tacexpr
open Proof_type
open Lib
open Safe_typing
-(*********************************************************************)
-(* Managing the proofs state *)
-(* Mainly contributed by C. Murthy *)
-(*********************************************************************)
-
-type lemma_possible_guards = int list list
-
-type proof_topstate = {
- mutable top_end_tac : tactic option;
- top_init_tac : tactic option;
- top_compute_guard : lemma_possible_guards;
- top_goal : goal;
- top_strength : Decl_kinds.goal_kind;
- top_hook : declaration_hook }
-
-let proof_edits =
- (Edit.empty() : (identifier,pftreestate,proof_topstate) Edit.t)
-
-let get_all_proof_names () = Edit.dom proof_edits
-
-let msg_proofs use_resume =
- match Edit.dom proof_edits with
- | [] -> (spc () ++ str"(No proof-editing in progress).")
- | l -> (str"." ++ fnl () ++ str"Proofs currently edited:" ++ spc () ++
- (prlist_with_sep pr_spc pr_id (get_all_proof_names ())) ++
- str"." ++
- (if use_resume then (fnl () ++ str"Use \"Resume\" first.")
- else (mt ()))
-)
-
-let undo_default = 50
-let undo_limit = ref undo_default
-
-(*********************************************************************)
-(* Functions for decomposing and modifying the proof state *)
-(*********************************************************************)
+let refining = Proof_global.there_are_pending_proofs
+let check_no_pending_proofs = Proof_global.check_no_pending_proof
-let get_state () =
- match Edit.read proof_edits with
- | None -> errorlabstrm "Pfedit.get_state"
- (str"No focused proof" ++ msg_proofs true)
- | Some(_,pfs,ts) -> (pfs,ts)
+let get_current_proof_name = Proof_global.get_current_proof_name
+let get_all_proof_names = Proof_global.get_all_proof_names
-let get_topstate () = snd(get_state())
-let get_pftreestate () = fst(get_state())
+type lemma_possible_guards = Proof_global.lemma_possible_guards
-let get_end_tac () = let ts = get_topstate () in ts.top_end_tac
+let delete_proof = Proof_global.discard
+let delete_current_proof = Proof_global.discard_current
+let delete_all_proofs = Proof_global.discard_all
-let get_goal_context n =
- let pftree = get_pftreestate () in
- let goal = nth_goal_of_pftreestate n pftree in
- (project goal, pf_env goal)
+let undo n =
+ let p = Proof_global.give_me_the_proof () in
+ for i = 1 to n do
+ Proof.undo p
+ done
-let get_current_goal_context () = get_goal_context 1
-
-let set_current_proof = Edit.focus proof_edits
-
-let resume_proof (loc,id) =
+let current_proof_depth () =
try
- Edit.focus proof_edits id
- with Invalid_argument "Edit.focus" ->
- user_err_loc(loc,"Pfedit.set_proof",str"No such proof" ++ msg_proofs false)
+ let p = Proof_global.give_me_the_proof () in
+ Proof.V82.depth p
+ with Proof_global.NoCurrentProof -> -1
-let suspend_proof () =
- try
- Edit.unfocus proof_edits
- with Invalid_argument "Edit.unfocus" ->
- errorlabstrm "Pfedit.suspend_current_proof"
- (str"No active proof" ++ (msg_proofs true))
-
-let resume_last_proof () =
- match (Edit.last_focused proof_edits) with
- | None ->
- errorlabstrm "resume_last" (str"No proof-editing in progress.")
- | Some p ->
- Edit.focus proof_edits p
-
-let get_current_proof_name () =
- match Edit.read proof_edits with
- | None ->
- errorlabstrm "Pfedit.get_proof"
- (str"No focused proof" ++ msg_proofs true)
- | Some(na,_,_) -> na
-
-let add_proof (na,pfs,ts) =
- Edit.create proof_edits (na,pfs,ts,!undo_limit+1)
-
-let delete_proof_gen = Edit.delete proof_edits
-
-let delete_proof (loc,id) =
- try
- delete_proof_gen id
- with (UserError ("Edit.delete",_)) ->
- user_err_loc
- (loc,"Pfedit.delete_proof",str"No such proof" ++ msg_proofs false)
-
-let mutate f =
+(* [undo_todepth n] resets the proof to its nth step (does [undo (d-n)] where d
+ is the depth of the focus stack). *)
+let undo_todepth n =
try
- Edit.mutate proof_edits (fun _ pfs -> f pfs)
- with Invalid_argument "Edit.mutate" ->
- errorlabstrm "Pfedit.mutate"
- (str"No focused proof" ++ msg_proofs true)
+ undo ((current_proof_depth ()) - n )
+ with Proof_global.NoCurrentProof when n=0 -> ()
-let start (na,ts) =
- let pfs = mk_pftreestate ts.top_goal in
- let pfs = Option.fold_right solve_pftreestate ts.top_init_tac pfs in
- add_proof(na,pfs,ts)
+let set_undo _ = ()
+let get_undo _ = None
-let restart_proof () =
- match Edit.read proof_edits with
- | None ->
- errorlabstrm "Pfedit.restart"
- (str"No focused proof to restart" ++ msg_proofs true)
- | Some(na,_,ts) ->
- delete_proof_gen na;
- start (na,ts);
- set_current_proof na
-
-let proof_term () =
- extract_pftreestate (get_pftreestate())
-
-(* Detect is one has completed a subtree of the initial goal *)
-let subtree_solved () =
- let pts = get_pftreestate () in
- is_complete_proof (proof_of_pftreestate pts) &
- not (is_top_pftreestate pts)
-
-let tree_solved () =
- let pts = get_pftreestate () in
- is_complete_proof (proof_of_pftreestate pts)
-
-let top_tree_solved () =
- let pts = get_pftreestate () in
- is_complete_proof (proof_of_pftreestate (top_of_tree pts))
-
-(*********************************************************************)
-(* Undo functions *)
-(*********************************************************************)
-
-let set_undo = function
- | None -> undo_limit := undo_default
- | Some n ->
- if n>=0 then
- undo_limit := n
- else
- error "Cannot set a negative undo limit"
-
-let get_undo () = Some !undo_limit
-
-let undo n =
- try
- Edit.undo proof_edits n;
- (* needed because the resolution of a subtree is done in 2 steps
- then a sequence of undo can lead to a focus on a completely solved
- subtree - this solution only works properly if undoing one step *)
- if subtree_solved() then Edit.undo proof_edits 1
- with (Invalid_argument "Edit.undo") ->
- errorlabstrm "Pfedit.undo" (str"No focused proof" ++ msg_proofs true)
-
-(* Undo current focused proof to reach depth [n]. This is used in
- [vernac_backtrack]. *)
-let undo_todepth n =
- try
- Edit.undo_todepth proof_edits n
- with (Invalid_argument "Edit.undo") ->
- errorlabstrm "Pfedit.undo" (str"No focused proof" ++ msg_proofs true)
-(* Return the depth of the current focused proof stack, this is used
- to put informations in coq prompt (in emacs mode). *)
-let current_proof_depth() =
- try
- Edit.depth proof_edits
- with (Invalid_argument "Edit.depth") -> -1
+let start_proof id str hyps c ?init_tac ?compute_guard hook =
+ let goals = [ (Global.env_of_context hyps , c) ] in
+ let init_tac = Option.map Proofview.V82.tactic init_tac in
+ Proof_global.start_proof id str goals ?compute_guard hook;
+ Option.iter Proof_global.run_tactic init_tac
-(*********************************************************************)
-(* Proof cooking *)
-(*********************************************************************)
+let restart_proof () =
+ let p = Proof_global.give_me_the_proof () in
+ try while true do
+ Proof.undo p
+ done with Proof.EmptyUndoStack -> ()
+
+let resume_last_proof () = Proof_global.resume_last ()
+let resume_proof (_,id) = Proof_global.resume id
+let suspend_proof () = Proof_global.suspend ()
+
+let cook_proof hook =
+ let prf = Proof_global.give_me_the_proof () in
+ hook prf;
+ match Proof_global.close_proof () with
+ | (i,([e],cg,str,h)) -> (i,(e,cg,str,h))
+ | _ -> Util.anomaly "Pfedit.cook_proof: more than one proof term."
let xml_cook_proof = ref (fun _ -> ())
let set_xml_cook_proof f = xml_cook_proof := f
-let cook_proof k =
- let (pfs,ts) = get_state()
- and ident = get_current_proof_name () in
- let {evar_concl=concl} = ts.top_goal
- and strength = ts.top_strength in
- let pfterm = extract_pftreestate pfs in
- !xml_cook_proof (strength,pfs);
- k pfs;
- (ident,
- ({ const_entry_body = pfterm;
- const_entry_type = Some concl;
- const_entry_opaque = true;
- const_entry_boxed = false},
- ts.top_compute_guard, strength, ts.top_hook))
-
-let current_proof_statement () =
- let ts = get_topstate() in
- (get_current_proof_name (), ts.top_strength,
- ts.top_goal.evar_concl, ts.top_hook)
-
-(*********************************************************************)
-(* Abort functions *)
-(*********************************************************************)
+let get_pftreestate () =
+ Proof_global.give_me_the_proof ()
-let refining () = [] <> (Edit.dom proof_edits)
+let set_end_tac tac =
+ let tac = Proofview.V82.tactic tac in
+ Proof_global.set_endline_tactic tac
+
+let set_used_variables l =
+ Proof_global.set_used_variables l
+let get_used_variables () =
+ Proof_global.get_used_variables ()
+
+exception NoSuchGoal
+let _ = Errors.register_handler begin function
+ | NoSuchGoal -> Util.error "No such goal."
+ | _ -> raise Errors.Unhandled
+end
+let get_nth_V82_goal i =
+ let p = Proof_global.give_me_the_proof () in
+ let { it=goals ; sigma = sigma } = Proof.V82.subgoals p in
+ try
+ { it=(List.nth goals (i-1)) ; sigma=sigma }
+ with Failure _ -> raise NoSuchGoal
+
+let get_goal_context_gen i =
+ try
+ let { it=goal ; sigma=sigma } = get_nth_V82_goal i in
+ (sigma, Refiner.pf_env { it=goal ; sigma=sigma })
+ with Proof_global.NoCurrentProof -> Util.error "No focused proof."
-let check_no_pending_proofs () =
- if refining () then
- errorlabstrm "check_no_pending_proofs"
- (str"Proof editing in progress" ++ (msg_proofs false) ++ fnl() ++
- str"Use \"Abort All\" first or complete proof(s).")
+let get_goal_context i =
+ try get_goal_context_gen i
+ with NoSuchGoal -> Util.error "No such goal."
-let delete_current_proof () = delete_proof_gen (get_current_proof_name ())
+let get_current_goal_context () =
+ try get_goal_context_gen 1
+ with NoSuchGoal ->
+ (* spiwack: returning empty evar_map, since if there is no goal, under focus,
+ there is no accessible evar either *)
+ (Evd.empty, Global.env ())
-let delete_all_proofs () = Edit.clear proof_edits
+let current_proof_statement () =
+ match Proof_global.V82.get_current_initial_conclusions () with
+ | (id,([concl],strength,hook)) -> id,strength,concl,hook
+ | _ -> Util.anomaly "Pfedit.current_proof_statement: more than one statement"
+
+let solve_nth ?(with_end_tac=false) gi tac =
+ try
+ let tac = Proofview.V82.tactic tac in
+ let tac = if with_end_tac then
+ Proof_global.with_end_tac tac
+ else
+ tac
+ in
+ Proof_global.run_tactic (Proofview.tclFOCUS gi gi tac)
+ with
+ | Proof_global.NoCurrentProof -> Util.error "No focused proof"
+ | Proofview.IndexOutOfRange | Failure "list_chop" ->
+ let msg = str "No such goal: " ++ int gi ++ str "." in
+ Util.errorlabstrm "" msg
+
+let by = solve_nth 1
+
+let instantiate_nth_evar_com n com =
+ let pf = Proof_global.give_me_the_proof () in
+ Proof.V82.instantiate_evar n com pf
-(*********************************************************************)
-(* Modifying the end tactic of the current profftree *)
-(*********************************************************************)
-let set_end_tac tac =
- let top = get_topstate () in
- top.top_end_tac <- Some tac
-
-(*********************************************************************)
-(* Modifying the current prooftree *)
-(*********************************************************************)
-
-let start_proof na str sign concl ?init_tac ?(compute_guard=[]) hook =
- let top_goal = mk_goal sign concl None in
- let ts = {
- top_end_tac = None;
- top_init_tac = init_tac;
- top_compute_guard = compute_guard;
- top_goal = top_goal;
- top_strength = str;
- top_hook = hook}
- in
- start(na,ts);
- set_current_proof na
-
-let solve_nth k tac =
- let pft = get_pftreestate () in
- if not (List.mem (-1) (cursor_of_pftreestate pft)) then
- mutate (solve_nth_pftreestate k tac)
- else
- error "cannot apply a tactic when we are descended behind a tactic-node"
-
-let by tac = mutate (solve_pftreestate tac)
-
-let instantiate_nth_evar_com n c =
- mutate (Evar_refiner.instantiate_pf_com n c)
-
-let traverse n = mutate (traverse n)
-
-(* [traverse_to path]
-
- Traverses the current proof to get to the location specified by
- [path].
-
- ALGORITHM: The algorithm works on reversed paths. One just has to remove
- the common part on the reversed paths.
-
-*)
-
-let common_ancestor l1 l2 =
- let rec common_aux l1 l2 =
- match l1, l2 with
- | a1::l1', a2::l2' when a1 = a2 -> common_aux l1' l2'
- | _, _ -> List.rev l1, List.length l2
- in
- common_aux (List.rev l1) (List.rev l2)
-
-let rec traverse_up = function
- | 0 -> (function pf -> pf)
- | n -> (function pf -> Refiner.traverse 0 (traverse_up (n - 1) pf))
-
-let rec traverse_down = function
- | [] -> (function pf -> pf)
- | n::l -> (function pf -> Refiner.traverse n (traverse_down l pf))
-
-let traverse_to path =
- let up_and_down path pfs =
- let cursor = cursor_of_pftreestate pfs in
- let down_list, up_count = common_ancestor path cursor in
- traverse_down down_list (traverse_up up_count pfs)
- in
- mutate (up_and_down path)
-
-(* traverse the proof tree until it reach the nth subgoal *)
-let traverse_nth_goal n = mutate (nth_unproven n)
-
-let traverse_prev_unproven () = mutate prev_unproven
-
-let traverse_next_unproven () = mutate next_unproven
-
-(* The goal focused on *)
-let focus_n = ref 0
-let make_focus n = focus_n := n
-let focus () = !focus_n
-let focused_goal () = let n = !focus_n in if n=0 then 1 else n
-
-let reset_top_of_tree () =
- mutate top_of_tree
-
-let reset_top_of_script () =
- mutate (fun pts ->
- try
- up_until_matching_rule is_proof_instr pts
- with Not_found -> top_of_tree pts)
(**********************************************************************)
(* Shortcut to build a term using tactics *)
@@ -355,7 +170,26 @@ let build_constant_by_tactic id sign typ tac =
delete_current_proof ();
raise e
-let build_by_tactic typ tac =
+let build_by_tactic env typ tac =
let id = id_of_string ("temporary_proof"^string_of_int (next())) in
- let sign = Decls.clear_proofs (Global.named_context ()) in
+ let sign = val_of_named_context (named_context env) in
(build_constant_by_tactic id sign typ tac).const_entry_body
+
+(**********************************************************************)
+(* Support for resolution of evars in tactic interpretation, including
+ resolution by application of tactics *)
+
+let implicit_tactic = ref None
+
+let declare_implicit_tactic tac = implicit_tactic := Some tac
+
+let solve_by_implicit_tactic env sigma (evk,args) =
+ let evi = Evd.find_undefined sigma evk in
+ match (!implicit_tactic, snd (evar_source evk sigma)) with
+ | Some tac, (ImplicitArg _ | QuestionMark _)
+ when
+ Sign.named_context_equal (Environ.named_context_of_val evi.evar_hyps)
+ (Environ.named_context env) ->
+ (try build_by_tactic env evi.evar_concl (tclCOMPLETE tac)
+ with e when Logic.catchable_exception e -> raise Exit)
+ | _ -> raise Exit