path: root/backend/Constpropproof.v

(* *********************************************************************)
(*                                                                     *)
(*              The Compcert verified compiler                         *)
(*                                                                     *)
(*          Xavier Leroy, INRIA Paris-Rocquencourt                     *)
(*                                                                     *)
(*  Copyright Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en     *)
(*  Automatique.  All rights reserved.  This file is distributed       *)
(*  under the terms of the INRIA Non-Commercial License Agreement.     *)
(*                                                                     *)
(* *********************************************************************)

(** Correctness proof for constant propagation. *)

Require Import Coqlib.
Require Import Maps.
Require Import AST.
Require Import Integers.
Require Import Values.
Require Import Events.
Require Import Memory.
Require Import Globalenvs.
Require Import Smallstep.
Require Import Op.
Require Import Registers.
Require Import RTL.
Require Import Lattice.
Require Import Kildall.
Require Import Liveness.
Require Import ConstpropOp.
Require Import Constprop.
Require Import ConstpropOpproof.

Section PRESERVATION.

Variable prog: program.
Let tprog := transf_program prog.
Let ge := Genv.globalenv prog.
Let tge := Genv.globalenv tprog.
Let gapp := make_global_approx (PTree.empty _) prog.(prog_defs).

(** * Correctness of the static analysis *)

Section ANALYSIS.

Variable sp: val.

Definition regs_match_approx (a: D.t) (rs: regset) : Prop :=
  forall r, val_match_approx ge sp (D.get r a) rs#r.

Lemma regs_match_approx_top:
  forall rs, regs_match_approx D.top rs.
Proof.
  intros. red; intros. simpl. rewrite PTree.gempty. 
  unfold Approx.top, val_match_approx. auto.
Qed.

Lemma val_match_approx_increasing:
  forall a1 a2 v,
  Approx.ge a1 a2 -> val_match_approx ge sp a2 v -> val_match_approx ge sp a1 v.
Proof.
  intros until v.
  intros [A|[B|C]].
  subst a1. simpl. auto.
  subst a2. simpl. tauto.
  subst a2. auto.
Qed.

Lemma regs_match_approx_increasing:
  forall a1 a2 rs,
  D.ge a1 a2 -> regs_match_approx a2 rs -> regs_match_approx a1 rs.
Proof.
  unfold D.ge, regs_match_approx. intros.
  apply val_match_approx_increasing with (D.get r a2); auto.
Qed.

Lemma regs_match_approx_update:
  forall ra rs a v r,
  val_match_approx ge sp a v ->
  regs_match_approx ra rs ->
  regs_match_approx (D.set r a ra) (rs#r <- v).
Proof.
  intros; red; intros. rewrite Regmap.gsspec. 
  case (peq r0 r); intro.
  subst r0. rewrite D.gss. auto.
  rewrite D.gso; auto. 
Qed.

Lemma approx_regs_val_list:
  forall ra rs rl,
  regs_match_approx ra rs ->
  val_list_match_approx ge sp (approx_regs ra rl) rs##rl.
Proof.
  induction rl; simpl; intros.
  constructor.
  constructor. apply H. auto.
Qed.

Lemma regs_match_approx_forget:
  forall rs rl ra,
  regs_match_approx ra rs ->
  regs_match_approx (List.fold_left (fun a r => D.set r Unknown a) rl ra) rs.
Proof.
  induction rl; simpl; intros.
  auto.
  apply IHrl. red; intros. destruct (peq r a). 
  subst a. rewrite D.gss. constructor. 
  rewrite D.gso; auto. 
Qed.

(** The correctness of the static analysis follows from the results
  of module [ConstpropOpproof] and the fact that the result of
  the static analysis is a solution of the forward dataflow inequations. *)

Lemma analyze_correct_1:
  forall f pc rs pc' i,
  f.(fn_code)!pc = Some i ->
  In pc' (successors_instr i) ->
  regs_match_approx (transfer gapp f pc (analyze gapp f)!!pc) rs ->
  regs_match_approx (analyze gapp f)!!pc' rs.
Proof.
  unfold analyze; intros.
  set (lu := last_uses f) in *.
  destruct (DS.fixpoint (successors f) (transfer' gapp f lu)
                        ((fn_entrypoint f, D.top) :: nil)) as [approxs|] eqn:FIX.
  apply regs_match_approx_increasing with (transfer' gapp f lu pc approxs!!pc).
  eapply DS.fixpoint_solution; eauto.
  unfold successors_list, successors. rewrite PTree.gmap1. rewrite H. auto.
  unfold transfer'. destruct (lu!pc) as [regs|]. 
  apply regs_match_approx_forget; auto. 
  auto.
  intros. rewrite PMap.gi. apply regs_match_approx_top. 
Qed.

Lemma analyze_correct_3:
  forall f rs,
  regs_match_approx (analyze gapp f)!!(f.(fn_entrypoint)) rs.
Proof.
  intros. unfold analyze. 
  set (lu := last_uses f) in *.
  destruct (DS.fixpoint (successors f) (transfer' gapp f lu)
                        ((fn_entrypoint f, D.top) :: nil)) as [approxs|] eqn:FIX.
  apply regs_match_approx_increasing with D.top.
  eapply DS.fixpoint_entry; eauto. auto with coqlib.
  apply regs_match_approx_top. 
  intros. rewrite PMap.gi. apply regs_match_approx_top.
Qed.

(** eval_static_load *)

Definition mem_match_approx (m: mem) : Prop :=
  forall id il b,
  gapp!id = Some il -> Genv.find_symbol ge id = Some b ->
  Genv.load_store_init_data ge m b 0 il /\
  Mem.valid_block m b /\
  (forall ofs, ~Mem.perm m b ofs Max Writable).

Lemma eval_load_init_sound:
  forall chunk m b il base ofs pos v,
  Genv.load_store_init_data ge m b base il ->
  Mem.load chunk m b ofs = Some v ->
  ofs = base + pos ->
  val_match_approx ge sp (eval_load_init chunk pos il) v.
Proof.
  induction il; simpl; intros.
(* base case il = nil *)
  auto.
(* inductive case *)
  destruct a.
  (* Init_int8 *)
  destruct H. destruct (zeq pos 0). subst.  rewrite Zplus_0_r in H0.
  destruct chunk; simpl; auto.
  rewrite Mem.load_int8_signed_unsigned in H0. rewrite H in H0. simpl in H0.
  inv H0. decEq. apply Int.sign_ext_zero_ext. compute; auto. 
  congruence.
  eapply IHil; eauto. omega.
  (* Init_int16 *)
  destruct H. destruct (zeq pos 0). subst.  rewrite Zplus_0_r in H0.
  destruct chunk; simpl; auto.
  rewrite Mem.load_int16_signed_unsigned in H0. rewrite H in H0. simpl in H0.
  inv H0. decEq. apply Int.sign_ext_zero_ext. compute; auto. 
  congruence.
  eapply IHil; eauto. omega.
  (* Init_int32 *)
  destruct H. destruct (zeq pos 0). subst.  rewrite Zplus_0_r in H0.
  destruct chunk; simpl; auto.
  congruence.
  eapply IHil; eauto. omega.
  (* Init_float32 *)
  destruct H. destruct (zeq pos 0). subst.  rewrite Zplus_0_r in H0.
  destruct chunk; simpl; auto. destruct (propagate_float_constants tt); simpl; auto.
  congruence.
  eapply IHil; eauto. omega.
  (* Init_float64 *)
  destruct H. destruct (zeq pos 0). subst.  rewrite Zplus_0_r in H0.
  destruct chunk; simpl; auto. destruct (propagate_float_constants tt); simpl; auto.
  congruence.
  eapply IHil; eauto. omega.
  (* Init_space *)
  eapply IHil; eauto. omega.
  (* Init_symbol *)
  destruct H as [[b' [A B]] C].
  destruct (zeq pos 0). subst.  rewrite Zplus_0_r in H0.
  destruct chunk; simpl; auto.
  unfold symbol_address. rewrite A. congruence.
  eapply IHil; eauto. omega.
Qed.

Lemma eval_static_load_sound:
  forall chunk m addr vaddr v,
  Mem.loadv chunk m vaddr = Some v ->
  mem_match_approx m ->  
  val_match_approx ge sp addr vaddr ->
  val_match_approx ge sp (eval_static_load gapp chunk addr) v.
Proof.
  intros. unfold eval_static_load. destruct addr; simpl; auto. 
  destruct (gapp!i) as [il|] eqn:?; auto.
  red in H1. subst vaddr. unfold symbol_address in H. 
  destruct (Genv.find_symbol ge i) as [b'|] eqn:?; simpl in H; try discriminate.
  exploit H0; eauto. intros [A [B C]]. 
  eapply eval_load_init_sound; eauto. 
  red; auto. 
Qed.

Lemma mem_match_approx_store:
  forall chunk m addr v m',
  mem_match_approx m ->
  Mem.storev chunk m addr v = Some m' ->
  mem_match_approx m'.
Proof.
  intros; red; intros. exploit H; eauto. intros [A [B C]].
  destruct addr; simpl in H0; try discriminate.
  exploit Mem.store_valid_access_3; eauto. intros [P Q].
  split. apply Genv.load_store_init_data_invariant with m; auto. 
  intros. eapply Mem.load_store_other; eauto. left; red; intro; subst b0.
  eapply C. apply Mem.perm_cur_max. eapply P. instantiate (1 := Int.unsigned i).
  generalize (size_chunk_pos chunk). omega.
  split. eauto with mem.
  intros; red; intros. eapply C. eapply Mem.perm_store_2; eauto.
Qed.

Lemma mem_match_approx_alloc:
  forall m lo hi b m',
  mem_match_approx m ->
  Mem.alloc m lo hi = (m', b) ->
  mem_match_approx m'.
Proof.
  intros; red; intros. exploit H; eauto. intros [A [B C]].
  split. apply Genv.load_store_init_data_invariant with m; auto.
  intros. eapply Mem.load_alloc_unchanged; eauto. 
  split. eauto with mem.
  intros; red; intros. exploit Mem.perm_alloc_inv; eauto. 
  rewrite zeq_false. apply C. eapply Mem.valid_not_valid_diff; eauto with mem.
Qed.

Lemma mem_match_approx_free:
  forall m lo hi b m',
  mem_match_approx m ->
  Mem.free m b lo hi = Some m' ->
  mem_match_approx m'.
Proof.
  intros; red; intros. exploit H; eauto. intros [A [B C]].
  split. apply Genv.load_store_init_data_invariant with m; auto.
  intros. eapply Mem.load_free; eauto.
  destruct (zeq b0 b); auto. subst b0.
  right. destruct (zlt lo hi); auto. 
  elim (C lo). apply Mem.perm_cur_max. 
  exploit Mem.free_range_perm; eauto. instantiate (1 := lo); omega. 
  intros; eapply Mem.perm_implies; eauto with mem.
  split. eauto with mem.
  intros; red; intros. eapply C. eauto with mem. 
Qed.

Lemma mem_match_approx_extcall:
  forall ef vargs m t vres m',
  mem_match_approx m ->
  external_call ef ge vargs m t vres m' ->
  mem_match_approx m'.
Proof.
  intros; red; intros. exploit H; eauto. intros [A [B C]].
  split. apply Genv.load_store_init_data_invariant with m; auto.
  intros. eapply external_call_readonly; eauto. 
  split. eapply external_call_valid_block; eauto.
  intros; red; intros. elim (C ofs). eapply external_call_max_perm; eauto. 
Qed.

(* Show that mem_match_approx holds initially *)

Definition global_approx_charact (g: genv) (ga: global_approx) : Prop :=
  forall id il b,
  ga!id = Some il -> 
  Genv.find_symbol g id = Some b -> 
  Genv.find_var_info g b = Some (mkglobvar tt il true false).

Lemma make_global_approx_correct:
  forall gdl g ga,
  global_approx_charact g ga ->
  global_approx_charact (Genv.add_globals g gdl) (make_global_approx ga gdl).
Proof.
  induction gdl; simpl; intros.
  auto.
  destruct a as [id gd]. apply IHgdl. 
  red; intros. 
  assert (EITHER: id0 = id /\ gd = Gvar(mkglobvar tt il true false)
               \/ id0 <> id /\ ga!id0 = Some il).
  destruct gd.
  rewrite PTree.grspec in H0. destruct (PTree.elt_eq id0 id); [discriminate|auto].
  destruct (gvar_readonly v && negb (gvar_volatile v)) eqn:?.
  rewrite PTree.gsspec in H0. destruct (peq id0 id).
  inv H0. left. split; auto. 
  destruct v; simpl in *. 
  destruct gvar_readonly; try discriminate.
  destruct gvar_volatile; try discriminate.
  destruct gvar_info. auto.
  auto.
  rewrite PTree.grspec in H0. destruct (PTree.elt_eq id0 id); [discriminate|auto].

  unfold Genv.add_global, Genv.find_symbol, Genv.find_var_info in *;
  simpl in *.
  destruct EITHER as [[A B] | [A B]].
  subst id0. rewrite PTree.gss in H1. inv H1. rewrite ZMap.gss. auto.
  rewrite PTree.gso in H1; auto. destruct gd. eapply H; eauto. 
  rewrite ZMap.gso. eapply H; eauto.
  exploit Genv.genv_symb_range; eauto. unfold ZIndexed.t. omega.
Qed.

Theorem mem_match_approx_init:
  forall m, Genv.init_mem prog = Some m -> mem_match_approx m.
Proof.
  intros. 
  assert (global_approx_charact ge gapp).
    unfold ge, gapp.   unfold Genv.globalenv.
    apply make_global_approx_correct.
    red; intros. rewrite PTree.gempty in H0; discriminate.
  red; intros. 
  exploit Genv.init_mem_characterization.
  unfold ge in H0. eapply H0; eauto. eauto. 
  unfold Genv.perm_globvar; simpl.
  intros [A [B C]].
  split. auto. split. eapply Genv.find_symbol_not_fresh; eauto. 
  intros; red; intros. exploit B; eauto. intros [P Q]. inv Q.
Qed.

End ANALYSIS.

(** * Correctness of the code transformation *)

(** We now show that the transformed code after constant propagation
  has the same semantics as the original code. *)

Lemma symbols_preserved:
  forall (s: ident), Genv.find_symbol tge s = Genv.find_symbol ge s.
Proof.
  intros; unfold ge, tge, tprog, transf_program. 
  apply Genv.find_symbol_transf.
Qed.

Lemma varinfo_preserved:
  forall b, Genv.find_var_info tge b = Genv.find_var_info ge b.
Proof.
  intros; unfold ge, tge, tprog, transf_program. 
  apply Genv.find_var_info_transf.
Qed.

Lemma functions_translated:
  forall (v: val) (f: fundef),
  Genv.find_funct ge v = Some f ->
  Genv.find_funct tge v = Some (transf_fundef gapp f).
Proof.  
  intros.
  exact (Genv.find_funct_transf (transf_fundef gapp) _ _ H).
Qed.

Lemma function_ptr_translated:
  forall (b: block) (f: fundef),
  Genv.find_funct_ptr ge b = Some f ->
  Genv.find_funct_ptr tge b = Some (transf_fundef gapp f).
Proof.  
  intros. 
  exact (Genv.find_funct_ptr_transf (transf_fundef gapp) _ _ H).
Qed.

Lemma sig_function_translated:
  forall f,
  funsig (transf_fundef gapp f) = funsig f.
Proof.
  intros. destruct f; reflexivity.
Qed.

Definition regs_lessdef (rs1 rs2: regset) : Prop :=
  forall r, Val.lessdef (rs1#r) (rs2#r).

Lemma regs_lessdef_regs:
  forall rs1 rs2, regs_lessdef rs1 rs2 ->
  forall rl, Val.lessdef_list rs1##rl rs2##rl.
Proof.
  induction rl; constructor; auto.
Qed.

Lemma set_reg_lessdef:
  forall r v1 v2 rs1 rs2,
  Val.lessdef v1 v2 -> regs_lessdef rs1 rs2 -> regs_lessdef (rs1#r <- v1) (rs2#r <- v2).
Proof.
  intros; red; intros. repeat rewrite Regmap.gsspec. 
  destruct (peq r0 r); auto.
Qed.

Lemma init_regs_lessdef:
  forall rl vl1 vl2,
  Val.lessdef_list vl1 vl2 ->
  regs_lessdef (init_regs vl1 rl) (init_regs vl2 rl).
Proof.
  induction rl; simpl; intros.
  red; intros. rewrite Regmap.gi. auto.
  inv H. red; intros. rewrite Regmap.gi. auto.
  apply set_reg_lessdef; auto.
Qed.

Lemma transf_ros_correct:
  forall sp ros rs rs' f approx,
  regs_match_approx sp approx rs ->
  find_function ge ros rs = Some f ->
  regs_lessdef rs rs' ->
  find_function tge (transf_ros approx ros) rs' = Some (transf_fundef gapp f).
Proof.
  intros. destruct ros; simpl in *.
  generalize (H r); intro MATCH. generalize (H1 r); intro LD.
  destruct (rs#r); simpl in H0; try discriminate.
  destruct (Int.eq_dec i Int.zero); try discriminate.
  inv LD. 
  assert (find_function tge (inl _ r) rs' = Some (transf_fundef gapp f)).
    simpl. rewrite <- H4. simpl. rewrite dec_eq_true. apply function_ptr_translated. auto.
  destruct (D.get r approx); auto.
  predSpec Int.eq Int.eq_spec i0 Int.zero; intros; auto.
  simpl in *. unfold symbol_address in MATCH. rewrite symbols_preserved.
  destruct (Genv.find_symbol ge i); try discriminate. 
  inv MATCH. apply function_ptr_translated; auto.
  rewrite symbols_preserved. destruct (Genv.find_symbol ge i); try discriminate.
  apply function_ptr_translated; auto.
Qed.

Lemma const_for_result_correct:
  forall a op sp v m,
  const_for_result a = Some op ->
  val_match_approx ge sp a v ->
  eval_operation tge sp op nil m = Some v.
Proof.
  unfold const_for_result; intros. 
  destruct a; inv H; simpl in H0.
  simpl. congruence.
  destruct (generate_float_constants tt); inv H2.  simpl. congruence.
  simpl. subst v. unfold symbol_address. rewrite symbols_preserved. auto.
  simpl. congruence.
Qed.

Inductive match_pc (f: function) (app: D.t): nat -> node -> node -> Prop :=
  | match_pc_base: forall n pc,
      match_pc f app n pc pc
  | match_pc_nop: forall n pc s pcx,
      f.(fn_code)!pc = Some (Inop s) ->
      match_pc f app n s pcx ->
      match_pc f app (Datatypes.S n) pc pcx
  | match_pc_cond: forall n pc cond args s1 s2 b,
      f.(fn_code)!pc = Some (Icond cond args s1 s2) ->
      eval_static_condition cond (approx_regs app args) = Some b ->
      match_pc f app (Datatypes.S n) pc (if b then s1 else s2).

Lemma match_successor_rec:
  forall f app n pc, match_pc f app n pc (successor_rec n f app pc).
Proof.
  induction n; simpl; intros.
  apply match_pc_base.
  destruct (fn_code f)!pc as [i|] eqn:?; try apply match_pc_base.
  destruct i; try apply match_pc_base.
  eapply match_pc_nop; eauto. 
  destruct (eval_static_condition c (approx_regs app l)) as [b|] eqn:?.
  eapply match_pc_cond; eauto.
  apply match_pc_base.
Qed.

Lemma match_successor:
  forall f app pc, match_pc f app num_iter pc (successor f app pc).
Proof.
  unfold successor; intros. apply match_successor_rec.
Qed.

Section BUILTIN_STRENGTH_REDUCTION.
Variable app: D.t.
Variable sp: val.
Variable rs: regset.
Hypothesis MATCH: forall r, val_match_approx ge sp (approx_reg app r) rs#r.

Lemma annot_strength_reduction_correct:
  forall targs args targs' args' eargs,
  annot_strength_reduction app targs args = (targs', args') ->
  eventval_list_match ge eargs (annot_args_typ targs) rs##args ->
  exists eargs',
  eventval_list_match ge eargs' (annot_args_typ targs') rs##args'
  /\ annot_eventvals targs' eargs' = annot_eventvals targs eargs.
Proof.
  induction targs; simpl; intros.
- inv H. simpl. exists eargs; auto. 
- destruct a.
  + destruct args as [ | arg args0]; simpl in H0; inv H0.
    destruct (annot_strength_reduction app targs args0) as [targs'' args''] eqn:E.
    exploit IHtargs; eauto. intros [eargs'' [A B]].
    assert (DFL:
      exists eargs',
      eventval_list_match ge eargs' (annot_args_typ (AA_arg ty :: targs'')) rs##(arg :: args'')
      /\ annot_eventvals (AA_arg ty :: targs'') eargs' = ev1 :: annot_eventvals targs evl).
    {
      exists (ev1 :: eargs''); split.
      simpl; constructor; auto. simpl. congruence.
    }
    destruct ty; destruct (approx_reg app arg) as [] eqn:E2; inv H; auto;
    exists eargs''; split; auto; simpl; f_equal; auto;
    generalize (MATCH arg); rewrite E2; simpl; intros E3;
    rewrite E3 in H5; inv H5; auto.
  + destruct (annot_strength_reduction app targs args) as [targs'' args''] eqn:E.
    inv H.
    exploit IHtargs; eauto. intros [eargs'' [A B]].
    exists eargs''; simpl; split; auto. congruence.
  + destruct (annot_strength_reduction app targs args) as [targs'' args''] eqn:E.
    inv H.
    exploit IHtargs; eauto. intros [eargs'' [A B]].
    exists eargs''; simpl; split; auto. congruence.
Qed.

Lemma builtin_strength_reduction_correct:
  forall ef args m t vres m',
  external_call ef ge rs##args m t vres m' ->
  let (ef', args') := builtin_strength_reduction app ef args in
  external_call ef' ge rs##args' m t vres m'.
Proof.
  intros until m'. functional induction (builtin_strength_reduction app ef args); intros; auto.
+ generalize (MATCH r1); rewrite e1; simpl; intros E. simpl in H.
  unfold symbol_address in E. destruct (Genv.find_symbol ge symb) as [b|] eqn:?; rewrite E in H.
  rewrite volatile_load_global_charact. exists b; auto. 
  inv H.
+ generalize (MATCH r1); rewrite e1; simpl; intros E. simpl in H.
  unfold symbol_address in E. destruct (Genv.find_symbol ge symb) as [b|] eqn:?; rewrite E in H.
  rewrite volatile_store_global_charact. exists b; auto. 
  inv H.
+ inv H. exploit annot_strength_reduction_correct; eauto.
  intros [eargs' [A B]]. 
  rewrite <- B. econstructor; eauto. 
Qed.

End BUILTIN_STRENGTH_REDUCTION.

(** The proof of semantic preservation is a simulation argument
  based on "option" diagrams of the following form:
<<
                 n
       st1 --------------- st2
        |                   |
       t|                   |t or (? and n' < n)
        |                   |
        v                   v
       st1'--------------- st2'
                 n'
>>
  The left vertical arrow represents a transition in the
  original RTL code.  The top horizontal bar is the [match_states]
  invariant between the initial state [st1] in the original RTL code
  and an initial state [st2] in the transformed code.
  This invariant expresses that all code fragments appearing in [st2]
  are obtained by [transf_code] transformation of the corresponding
  fragments in [st1].  Moreover, the values of registers in [st1]
  must match their compile-time approximations at the current program
  point.
  These two parts of the diagram are the hypotheses.  In conclusions,
  we want to prove the other two parts: the right vertical arrow,
  which is a transition in the transformed RTL code, and the bottom
  horizontal bar, which means that the [match_state] predicate holds
  between the final states [st1'] and [st2']. *)

Inductive match_stackframes: stackframe -> stackframe -> Prop :=
   match_stackframe_intro:
      forall res sp pc rs f rs',
      regs_lessdef rs rs' ->
      (forall v, regs_match_approx sp (analyze gapp f)!!pc (rs#res <- v)) ->
    match_stackframes
        (Stackframe res f sp pc rs)
        (Stackframe res (transf_function gapp f) sp pc rs').

Inductive match_states: nat -> state -> state -> Prop :=
  | match_states_intro:
      forall s sp pc rs m f s' pc' rs' m' app n
           (MATCH1: regs_match_approx sp app rs)
           (MATCH2: regs_match_approx sp (analyze gapp f)!!pc rs)
           (GMATCH: mem_match_approx m)
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (PC: match_pc f app n pc pc')
           (REGS: regs_lessdef rs rs')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      match_states n (State s f sp pc rs m)
                    (State s' (transf_function gapp f) sp pc' rs' m')
  | match_states_call:
      forall s f args m s' args' m'
           (GMATCH: mem_match_approx m)
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (ARGS: Val.lessdef_list args args')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      match_states O (Callstate s f args m)
                    (Callstate s' (transf_fundef gapp f) args' m')
  | match_states_return:
      forall s v m s' v' m'
           (GMATCH: mem_match_approx m)
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (RES: Val.lessdef v v')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      list_forall2 match_stackframes s s' ->
      match_states O (Returnstate s v m)
                    (Returnstate s' v' m').

Lemma match_states_succ:
  forall s f sp pc2 rs m s' rs' m' pc1 i,
  f.(fn_code)!pc1 = Some i ->
  In pc2 (successors_instr i) ->
  regs_match_approx sp (transfer gapp f pc1 (analyze gapp f)!!pc1) rs ->
  mem_match_approx m ->
  list_forall2 match_stackframes s s' ->
  regs_lessdef rs rs' ->
  Mem.extends m m' ->
  match_states O (State s f sp pc2 rs m)
                (State s' (transf_function gapp f) sp pc2 rs' m').
Proof.
  intros. 
  assert (regs_match_approx sp (analyze gapp f)!!pc2 rs).
    eapply analyze_correct_1; eauto.
  apply match_states_intro with (app := (analyze gapp f)!!pc2); auto.
  constructor.
Qed.

Lemma transf_instr_at:
  forall f pc i,
  f.(fn_code)!pc = Some i ->
  (transf_function gapp f).(fn_code)!pc = Some(transf_instr gapp f (analyze gapp f) pc i).
Proof.
  intros. simpl. unfold transf_code. rewrite PTree.gmap. rewrite H. auto. 
Qed.

Ltac TransfInstr :=
  match goal with
  | H: (PTree.get ?pc (fn_code ?f) = Some ?instr) |- _ =>
      generalize (transf_instr_at _ _ _ H); simpl
  end.

(** The proof of simulation proceeds by case analysis on the transition
  taken in the source code. *)

Lemma transf_step_correct:
  forall s1 t s2,
  step ge s1 t s2 ->
  forall n1 s1' (MS: match_states n1 s1 s1'),
  (exists n2, exists s2', step tge s1' t s2' /\ match_states n2 s2 s2')
  \/ (exists n2, n2 < n1 /\ t = E0 /\ match_states n2 s2 s1')%nat.
Proof.
  induction 1; intros; inv MS; try (inv PC; try congruence).

  (* Inop, preserved *)
  rename pc'0 into pc. TransfInstr; intro.
  left; econstructor; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_Inop; eauto.
  eapply match_states_succ; eauto. simpl; auto.
  unfold transfer; rewrite H. auto. 

  (* Inop, skipped over *)
  rewrite H0 in H; inv H. 
  right; exists n; split. omega. split. auto.
  apply match_states_intro with app; auto.
  eapply analyze_correct_1; eauto. simpl; auto. 
  unfold transfer; rewrite H0. auto. 

  (* Iop *)
  rename pc'0 into pc. TransfInstr.
  set (app_before := (analyze gapp f)#pc).
  set (a := eval_static_operation op (approx_regs app_before args)).
  set (app_after := D.set res a app_before).
  assert (VMATCH: val_match_approx ge sp a v).  
    eapply eval_static_operation_correct; eauto.
    apply approx_regs_val_list; auto.
  assert (MATCH': regs_match_approx sp app_after rs#res <- v).
    apply regs_match_approx_update; auto.
  assert (MATCH'': regs_match_approx sp (analyze gapp f) # pc' rs # res <- v).
    eapply analyze_correct_1 with (pc := pc); eauto. simpl; auto.
    unfold transfer; rewrite H. auto.  
  destruct (const_for_result a) as [cop|] eqn:?; intros.
  (* constant is propagated *)
  left; econstructor; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_Iop; eauto. 
  eapply const_for_result_correct; eauto.
  apply match_states_intro with app_after; auto.
  apply match_successor. 
  apply set_reg_lessdef; auto.
  (* operator is strength-reduced *)
  exploit op_strength_reduction_correct. eexact MATCH2. reflexivity. eauto. 
  fold app_before.
  destruct (op_strength_reduction op args (approx_regs app_before args)) as [op' args'].
  intros [v' [EV' LD']].
  assert (EV'': exists v'', eval_operation ge sp op' rs'##args' m' = Some v'' /\ Val.lessdef v' v'').
  eapply eval_operation_lessdef; eauto. eapply regs_lessdef_regs; eauto.
  destruct EV'' as [v'' [EV'' LD'']].
  left; econstructor; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_Iop; eauto.
  erewrite eval_operation_preserved. eexact EV''. exact symbols_preserved.
  apply match_states_intro with app_after; auto.
  apply match_successor.
  apply set_reg_lessdef; auto. eapply Val.lessdef_trans; eauto.

  (* Iload *)
  rename pc'0 into pc. TransfInstr. 
  set (ap1 := eval_static_addressing addr
               (approx_regs (analyze gapp f) # pc args)).
  set (ap2 := eval_static_load gapp chunk ap1).
  assert (VM1: val_match_approx ge sp ap1 a).
    eapply eval_static_addressing_correct; eauto.
    eapply approx_regs_val_list; eauto.
  assert (VM2: val_match_approx ge sp ap2 v).
    eapply eval_static_load_sound; eauto.
  destruct (const_for_result ap2) as [cop|] eqn:?; intros.
  (* constant-propagated *)
  left; econstructor; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_Iop; eauto. eapply const_for_result_correct; eauto.
  eapply match_states_succ; eauto. simpl; auto.
  unfold transfer; rewrite H. apply regs_match_approx_update; auto.
  apply set_reg_lessdef; auto.
  (* strength-reduced *)
  generalize (addr_strength_reduction_correct ge sp (analyze gapp f)!!pc rs
                  MATCH2 addr args (approx_regs (analyze gapp f) # pc args) (refl_equal _)).
  destruct (addr_strength_reduction addr args (approx_regs (analyze gapp f) # pc args)) as [addr' args'].
  rewrite H0. intros P.
  assert (ADDR': exists a', eval_addressing ge sp addr' rs'##args' = Some a' /\ Val.lessdef a a').
    eapply eval_addressing_lessdef; eauto. eapply regs_lessdef_regs; eauto.
  destruct ADDR' as [a' [A B]].
  assert (C: eval_addressing tge sp addr' rs'##args' = Some a').
    rewrite <- A. apply eval_addressing_preserved. exact symbols_preserved.
  exploit Mem.loadv_extends; eauto. intros [v' [D E]].
  left; econstructor; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_Iload; eauto.
  eapply match_states_succ; eauto. simpl; auto.
  unfold transfer; rewrite H. apply regs_match_approx_update; auto.
  apply set_reg_lessdef; auto.

  (* Istore *)
  rename pc'0 into pc. TransfInstr.
  generalize (addr_strength_reduction_correct ge sp (analyze gapp f)!!pc rs
                  MATCH2 addr args (approx_regs (analyze gapp f) # pc args) (refl_equal _)).
  destruct (addr_strength_reduction addr args (approx_regs (analyze gapp f) # pc args)) as [addr' args'].
  intros P Q. rewrite H0 in P.
  assert (ADDR': exists a', eval_addressing ge sp addr' rs'##args' = Some a' /\ Val.lessdef a a').
    eapply eval_addressing_lessdef; eauto. eapply regs_lessdef_regs; eauto.
  destruct ADDR' as [a' [A B]].
  assert (C: eval_addressing tge sp addr' rs'##args' = Some a').
    rewrite <- A. apply eval_addressing_preserved. exact symbols_preserved.
  exploit Mem.storev_extends; eauto. intros [m2' [D E]].
  left; econstructor; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_Istore; eauto.
  eapply match_states_succ; eauto. simpl; auto.
  unfold transfer; rewrite H. auto. 
  eapply mem_match_approx_store; eauto.

  (* Icall *)
  rename pc'0 into pc.
  exploit transf_ros_correct; eauto. intro FIND'.
  TransfInstr; intro.
  left; econstructor; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_Icall; eauto. apply sig_function_translated; auto.
  constructor; auto. constructor; auto.
  econstructor; eauto. 
  intros. eapply analyze_correct_1; eauto. simpl; auto.
  unfold transfer; rewrite H.
  apply regs_match_approx_update; auto. simpl. auto.
  apply regs_lessdef_regs; auto. 

  (* Itailcall *)
  exploit Mem.free_parallel_extends; eauto. intros [m2' [A B]].
  exploit transf_ros_correct; eauto. intros FIND'.
  TransfInstr; intro.
  left; econstructor; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_Itailcall; eauto. apply sig_function_translated; auto.
  constructor; auto. 
  eapply mem_match_approx_free; eauto.
  apply regs_lessdef_regs; auto. 

  (* Ibuiltin *)
  rename pc'0 into pc.
Opaque builtin_strength_reduction.
  exploit builtin_strength_reduction_correct; eauto. 
  TransfInstr.
  destruct (builtin_strength_reduction (analyze gapp f)#pc ef args) as [ef' args'].
  intros P Q.
  exploit external_call_mem_extends; eauto. 
  instantiate (1 := rs'##args'). apply regs_lessdef_regs; auto.
  intros [v' [m2' [A [B [C D]]]]].
  left; econstructor; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_Ibuiltin. eauto. 
  eapply external_call_symbols_preserved; eauto.
  exact symbols_preserved. exact varinfo_preserved.
  eapply match_states_succ; eauto. simpl; auto.
  unfold transfer; rewrite H. 
  apply regs_match_approx_update; auto. simpl; auto.
  eapply mem_match_approx_extcall; eauto. 
  apply set_reg_lessdef; auto.

  (* Icond, preserved *)
  rename pc'0 into pc. TransfInstr. 
  generalize (cond_strength_reduction_correct ge sp (analyze gapp f)#pc rs m
                    MATCH2 cond args (approx_regs (analyze gapp f) # pc args) (refl_equal _)).
  destruct (cond_strength_reduction cond args (approx_regs (analyze gapp f) # pc args)) as [cond' args'].
  intros EV1 TCODE.
  left; exists O; exists (State s' (transf_function gapp f) sp (if b then ifso else ifnot) rs' m'); split. 
  destruct (eval_static_condition cond (approx_regs (analyze gapp f) # pc args)) eqn:?.
  assert (eval_condition cond rs ## args m = Some b0).
    eapply eval_static_condition_correct; eauto. eapply approx_regs_val_list; eauto.
  assert (b = b0) by congruence. subst b0.
  destruct b; eapply exec_Inop; eauto. 
  eapply exec_Icond; eauto.
  eapply eval_condition_lessdef with (vl1 := rs##args'); eauto. eapply regs_lessdef_regs; eauto. congruence.
  eapply match_states_succ; eauto. 
  destruct b; simpl; auto.
  unfold transfer; rewrite H. auto.

  (* Icond, skipped over *)
  rewrite H1 in H; inv H. 
  assert (eval_condition cond rs ## args m = Some b0).
    eapply eval_static_condition_correct; eauto. eapply approx_regs_val_list; eauto.
  assert (b = b0) by congruence. subst b0.
  right; exists n; split. omega. split. auto. 
  assert (MATCH': regs_match_approx sp (analyze gapp f) # (if b then ifso else ifnot) rs).
    eapply analyze_correct_1; eauto. destruct b; simpl; auto.
    unfold transfer; rewrite H1; auto.
  econstructor; eauto. constructor. 

  (* Ijumptable *)
  rename pc'0 into pc.
  assert (A: (fn_code (transf_function gapp f))!pc = Some(Ijumptable arg tbl)
             \/ (fn_code (transf_function gapp f))!pc = Some(Inop pc')).
  TransfInstr. destruct (approx_reg (analyze gapp f) # pc arg) eqn:?; auto.
  generalize (MATCH2 arg). unfold approx_reg in Heqt. rewrite Heqt. rewrite H0. 
  simpl. intro EQ; inv EQ. rewrite H1. auto.
  assert (B: rs'#arg = Vint n).
  generalize (REGS arg); intro LD; inv LD; congruence.
  left; exists O; exists (State s' (transf_function gapp f) sp pc' rs' m'); split.
  destruct A. eapply exec_Ijumptable; eauto. eapply exec_Inop; eauto.
  eapply match_states_succ; eauto.
  simpl. eapply list_nth_z_in; eauto.
  unfold transfer; rewrite  H; auto.

  (* Ireturn *)
  exploit Mem.free_parallel_extends; eauto. intros [m2' [A B]].
  left; exists O; exists (Returnstate s' (regmap_optget or Vundef rs') m2'); split.
  eapply exec_Ireturn; eauto. TransfInstr; auto.
  constructor; auto.
  eapply mem_match_approx_free; eauto.
  destruct or; simpl; auto. 

  (* internal function *)
  exploit Mem.alloc_extends. eauto. eauto. apply Zle_refl. apply Zle_refl.
  intros [m2' [A B]].
  simpl. unfold transf_function.
  left; exists O; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_function_internal; simpl; eauto.
  simpl. econstructor; eauto.
  apply analyze_correct_3; auto.
  apply analyze_correct_3; auto.
  eapply mem_match_approx_alloc; eauto.
  instantiate (1 := f). constructor.
  apply init_regs_lessdef; auto.

  (* external function *)
  exploit external_call_mem_extends; eauto. 
  intros [v' [m2' [A [B [C D]]]]].
  simpl. left; econstructor; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_function_external; eauto.
  eapply external_call_symbols_preserved; eauto.
  exact symbols_preserved. exact varinfo_preserved.
  constructor; auto.
  eapply mem_match_approx_extcall; eauto.

  (* return *)
  inv H4. inv H1. 
  left; exists O; econstructor; split.
  eapply exec_return; eauto. 
  econstructor; eauto. constructor. apply set_reg_lessdef; auto. 
Qed.

Lemma transf_initial_states:
  forall st1, initial_state prog st1 ->
  exists n, exists st2, initial_state tprog st2 /\ match_states n st1 st2.
Proof.
  intros. inversion H.
  exploit function_ptr_translated; eauto. intro FIND.
  exists O; exists (Callstate nil (transf_fundef gapp f) nil m0); split.
  econstructor; eauto.
  apply Genv.init_mem_transf; auto.
  replace (prog_main tprog) with (prog_main prog).
  rewrite symbols_preserved. eauto.
  reflexivity.
  rewrite <- H3. apply sig_function_translated.
  constructor. 
  eapply mem_match_approx_init; eauto.
  constructor. constructor. apply Mem.extends_refl.
Qed.

Lemma transf_final_states:
  forall n st1 st2 r, 
  match_states n st1 st2 -> final_state st1 r -> final_state st2 r.
Proof.
  intros. inv H0. inv H. inv STACKS. inv RES. constructor. 
Qed.

(** The preservation of the observable behavior of the program then
  follows. *)

Theorem transf_program_correct:
  forward_simulation (RTL.semantics prog) (RTL.semantics tprog).
Proof.
  eapply Forward_simulation with (fsim_order := lt); simpl.
  apply lt_wf. 
  eexact transf_initial_states.
  eexact transf_final_states.
  fold ge; fold tge. intros. 
    exploit transf_step_correct; eauto. 
    intros [ [n2 [s2' [A B]]] | [n2 [A [B C]]]].
    exists n2; exists s2'; split; auto. left; apply plus_one; auto.
    exists n2; exists s2; split; auto. right; split; auto. subst t; apply star_refl. 
  eexact symbols_preserved.
Qed.

End PRESERVATION.