Update patches

Bump SONAME and inline namespace in configuration, update location of
SSE2 and SSSE3 configuration, and delete patches that have been applied
upstream.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 141 deletions

diff --git a/debian/patches/float-tests-disable-i386.diff b/debian/patches/float-tests-disable-i386.diff
deleted file mode 100644
index 0aef2805..00000000
--- a/debian/patches/float-tests-disable-i386.diff
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,141 +0,0 @@
-From: Benjamin Barenblat <bbaren@google.com>
-Subject: Skip floating-point edge-case tests when using an x87
-Forwarded: yes
-Applied-Upstream: https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/commit/311bbd2e50ea35e921a08186840d3b6ca279e880
-
-32-bit Intel CPUs use 80-bit floats for intermediate values, which can
-change the results of floating point computations from what we normally
-expect. Identify tests that are sensitive to the x87, and skip them when
-we’re on 32-bit Intel.
-
-The author works at Google. Upstream applied this patch as Piper
-revision 378722613 and exported it to GitHub; the Applied-Upstream URL
-above points to the exported commit.
-
---- a/absl/random/beta_distribution_test.cc
-+++ b/absl/random/beta_distribution_test.cc
-@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
- #include "absl/random/beta_distribution.h"
- 
- #include <algorithm>
-+#include <cfloat>
- #include <cstddef>
- #include <cstdint>
- #include <iterator>
-@@ -558,6 +559,14 @@
- // dependencies of the distribution change, such as RandU64ToDouble, then this
- // is also likely to change.
- TEST(BetaDistributionTest, AlgorithmBounds) {
-+#if (defined(__i386__) || defined(_M_IX86)) && FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
-+  // We're using an x87-compatible FPU, and intermediate operations are
-+  // performed with 80-bit floats. This produces slightly different results from
-+  // what we expect below.
-+  GTEST_SKIP()
-+      << "Skipping the test because we detected x87 floating-point semantics";
-+#endif
-+
-   {
-     absl::random_internal::sequence_urbg urbg(
-         {0x7fbe76c8b4395800ull, 0x8000000000000000ull});
---- a/absl/random/distributions_test.cc
-+++ b/absl/random/distributions_test.cc
-@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
- 
- #include "absl/random/distributions.h"
- 
-+#include <cfloat>
- #include <cmath>
- #include <cstdint>
- #include <random>
-@@ -224,6 +225,15 @@
- TEST_F(RandomDistributionsTest, UniformNonsenseRanges) {
-   // The ranges used in this test are undefined behavior.
-   // The results are arbitrary and subject to future changes.
-+
-+#if (defined(__i386__) || defined(_M_IX86)) && FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
-+  // We're using an x87-compatible FPU, and intermediate operations can be
-+  // performed with 80-bit floats. This produces slightly different results from
-+  // what we expect below.
-+  GTEST_SKIP()
-+      << "Skipping the test because we detected x87 floating-point semantics";
-+#endif
-+
-   absl::InsecureBitGen gen;
- 
-   // <uint>
---- a/absl/random/exponential_distribution_test.cc
-+++ b/absl/random/exponential_distribution_test.cc
-@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
- #include "absl/random/exponential_distribution.h"
- 
- #include <algorithm>
-+#include <cfloat>
- #include <cmath>
- #include <cstddef>
- #include <cstdint>
-@@ -384,6 +385,15 @@
- TEST(ExponentialDistributionTest, AlgorithmBounds) {
-   // Relies on absl::uniform_real_distribution, so some of these comments
-   // reference that.
-+
-+#if (defined(__i386__) || defined(_M_IX86)) && FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
-+  // We're using an x87-compatible FPU, and intermediate operations can be
-+  // performed with 80-bit floats. This produces slightly different results from
-+  // what we expect below.
-+  GTEST_SKIP()
-+      << "Skipping the test because we detected x87 floating-point semantics";
-+#endif
-+
-   absl::exponential_distribution<double> dist;
- 
-   {
---- a/absl/random/uniform_real_distribution_test.cc
-+++ b/absl/random/uniform_real_distribution_test.cc
-@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
- 
- #include "absl/random/uniform_real_distribution.h"
- 
-+#include <cfloat>
- #include <cmath>
- #include <cstdint>
- #include <iterator>
-@@ -70,6 +71,14 @@
- TYPED_TEST_SUITE(UniformRealDistributionTest, RealTypes);
- 
- TYPED_TEST(UniformRealDistributionTest, ParamSerializeTest) {
-+#if (defined(__i386__) || defined(_M_IX86)) && FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
-+  // We're using an x87-compatible FPU, and intermediate operations are
-+  // performed with 80-bit floats. This produces slightly different results from
-+  // what we expect below.
-+  GTEST_SKIP()
-+      << "Skipping the test because we detected x87 floating-point semantics";
-+#endif
-+
-   using param_type =
-       typename absl::uniform_real_distribution<TypeParam>::param_type;
- 
---- a/absl/time/duration_test.cc
-+++ b/absl/time/duration_test.cc
-@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
- #endif
- 
- #include <chrono>  // NOLINT(build/c++11)
-+#include <cfloat>
- #include <cmath>
- #include <cstdint>
- #include <ctime>
-@@ -1390,6 +1391,14 @@
- // Seconds(point) returns a duration near point * Seconds(1.0). (They may
- // not be exactly equal due to fused multiply/add contraction.)
- TEST(Duration, ToDoubleSecondsCheckEdgeCases) {
-+#if (defined(__i386__) || defined(_M_IX86)) && FLT_EVAL_METHOD != 0
-+  // We're using an x87-compatible FPU, and intermediate operations can be
-+  // performed with 80-bit floats. This means the edge cases are different than
-+  // what we expect here, so just skip this test.
-+  GTEST_SKIP()
-+      << "Skipping the test because we detected x87 floating-point semantics";
-+#endif
-+
-   constexpr uint32_t kTicksPerSecond = absl::time_internal::kTicksPerSecond;
-   constexpr auto duration_tick = absl::time_internal::MakeDuration(0, 1u);
-   int misses = 0;