| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
full content of native aspects.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 190489694
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of --direct_dependency, --indirect_dependency args we now emit --direct_dependencies. We no longer need to emit any jar owner information since that is baked into the jar by JavaBuilder.
This CL also contains the deletion of CustomMultiArgv and the injecting_rule_kind aspect parameter, as the deleted code was the last remaining usage.
RELNOTES: None
PiperOrigin-RevId: 187558628
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Blaze had its own class to avoid GC from varargs array creation for the precondition happy path. Guava now (mostly) implements these, making it unnecessary to maintain our own.
This change was almost entirely automated by search-and-replace. A few BUILD files needed fixing up since I removed an export of preconditions from lib:util, which was all done by add_deps. There was one incorrect usage of Preconditions that was caught by error prone (which checks Guava's version of Preconditions) that I had to change manually.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 175033526
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
RELNOTES: None
PiperOrigin-RevId: 165010750
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If an Aspect registered an action that an extra-action is
shadowing, its name is used when creating the extra-action's ID and
name.
Since recently, an aspect can see other aspects applied to the same
target. This CL record the names of other aspects applied to the target
as well, disambiguating the action owners.
--
PiperOrigin-RevId: 142264153
MOS_MIGRATED_REVID=142264153
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
pass the name of the injecting rule (e.g., java_proto_library), if the rule registered it.
Registration is done using AspectParameters and a specially-named key.
--
MOS_MIGRATED_REVID=128179548
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are no syntactic changes within Skylark; the only difference is that aspects may have non-implicit attributes, so long as they have type 'string' and use the 'values' restriction. Such aspects may only be requested by rules which have attributes with types and names matching the non-implicit, non-defaulted attributes of the aspect.
This is not yet a complete match for native AspectParameters functionality since implicit attributes cannot yet be affected by attribute values, but that will be added later.
Implicit aspects are still required to have default values. Non-implicit aspect attributes are considered "required" unless they have a default value. An error will occur if they are applied to a rule that does not "cover" all required attributes by having attributes of matching name and type. While non-implicit aspect attributes with a default are not required, they will still take on the value of a rule attribute with the same name and type if it is present.
Aspects with non-implicit, non-defaulted ("required") attributes cannot be requested on the command line, only by a rule.
RELNOTES: Expose parameterized aspects to Skylark.
--
MOS_MIGRATED_REVID=121711715
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NativeAspectClass.
This a large refactoring of the aspects, currently we have the following:
- AspectClasses: The interface AspectClass is a implemented by either
SkylarkAspectClass or NativeAspectClass<NativeAspectFactory>.
They are wrappers for the AspectFactories and they hold the information about
the Class<> of the factory.
- AspectFactories (FooAspect.java): Represented by the interfaces
ConfiguredAspectFactory and NativeAspectFactory, also by
the interface ConfiguredNativeAspectFactory which is the union of the two
aforementioned interfaces.
All aspects implement ConfiguredNativeAspectFactory except Skylark aspects
which implement only ConfiguredAspectFactory.
After this CL the distinction between NativeAspectFactories and NativeAspectClasses
dissappear, namely aspect that extends NativeAspectClass is considered native
and if it implements ConfiguredAspectFactory it is configured.
Therefore the interfaces NativeAspectFactory and ConfiguredNativeAspectFactory
both disappear.
With this refactoring the aspectFactoryMap in the ConfiguredRuleClassProvider
changes its type from (String -> Class<? extends NativeAspectClass>)
to (String -> NativeAspectClass) which means it is now able to have an instance
of the aspect instead of its Class only.
By doing this, it is now possible to pass parameters when creating an
aspect in the ConfiguredRuleClassProvider.
--
MOS_MIGRATED_REVID=120819647
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Aspect becomes a triple (AspectClass, AspectDefinition,
AspectParameters) and loses its equals() method.
After this CL, SkylarkAspectClass.getDefintion still exists and is
deprecated.
--
MOS_MIGRATED_REVID=119159653
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
--noimplicit_deps and/or --nohost_deps.
RELNOTES: --noimplicit_deps and --nohost_deps work correctly for Aspect attributes.
--
MOS_MIGRATED_REVID=112724917
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reduces garbage.
--
MOS_MIGRATED_REVID=109914243
|
|
|
Aspect => ConfiguredAspect
AspectWithParameters => Aspect
--
MOS_MIGRATED_REVID=107375211
|
janakr
tomlu
Dmitry Lomov
Carmi Grushko
Googler
Luis Fernando Pino Duque
Mark Schaller