aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/third_party/protobuf/csharp/protos
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'third_party/protobuf/csharp/protos')
-rw-r--r--third_party/protobuf/csharp/protos/unittest_custom_options_proto3.proto336
-rw-r--r--third_party/protobuf/csharp/protos/unittest_issues.proto126
2 files changed, 462 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/third_party/protobuf/csharp/protos/unittest_custom_options_proto3.proto b/third_party/protobuf/csharp/protos/unittest_custom_options_proto3.proto
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..87bd0f7a84
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/protobuf/csharp/protos/unittest_custom_options_proto3.proto
@@ -0,0 +1,336 @@
+// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
+// Copyright 2008 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
+// https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+// Author: benjy@google.com (Benjy Weinberger)
+// Based on original Protocol Buffers design by
+// Sanjay Ghemawat, Jeff Dean, and others.
+//
+// A proto file used to test the "custom options" feature of google.protobuf.
+
+// This file is based on unittest_custom_options.proto in
+// src/google/protobuf, but is modified for proto3. It could
+// potentially be moved into src/google/protobuf, but currently C#
+// is the only language that really needs it, as we don't support
+// proto2 syntax. It's cut down significantly as proto3 only supports
+// extensions for options.
+
+
+syntax = "proto3";
+
+// A custom file option (defined below).
+option (file_opt1) = 9876543210;
+
+import "google/protobuf/descriptor.proto";
+
+// We don't put this in a package within proto2 because we need to make sure
+// that the generated code doesn't depend on being in the proto2 namespace.
+package protobuf_unittest;
+option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
+
+// Some simple test custom options of various types.
+
+extend google.protobuf.FileOptions {
+ uint64 file_opt1 = 7736974;
+}
+
+extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
+ int32 message_opt1 = 7739036;
+}
+
+extend google.protobuf.FieldOptions {
+ fixed64 field_opt1 = 7740936;
+}
+
+extend google.protobuf.OneofOptions {
+ int32 oneof_opt1 = 7740111;
+}
+
+extend google.protobuf.EnumOptions {
+ sfixed32 enum_opt1 = 7753576;
+}
+
+extend google.protobuf.EnumValueOptions {
+ int32 enum_value_opt1 = 1560678;
+}
+
+extend google.protobuf.ServiceOptions {
+ sint64 service_opt1 = 7887650;
+}
+
+enum MethodOpt1 {
+ METHODOPT1_UNSPECIFIED = 0;
+ METHODOPT1_VAL1 = 1;
+ METHODOPT1_VAL2 = 2;
+}
+
+extend google.protobuf.MethodOptions {
+ MethodOpt1 method_opt1 = 7890860;
+}
+
+// A test message with custom options at all possible locations (and also some
+// regular options, to make sure they interact nicely).
+message TestMessageWithCustomOptions {
+ option message_set_wire_format = false;
+
+ option (message_opt1) = -56;
+
+ string field1 = 1 [ctype=CORD,
+ (field_opt1)=8765432109];
+
+ oneof AnOneof {
+ option (oneof_opt1) = -99;
+ int32 oneof_field = 2;
+ }
+
+ enum AnEnum {
+ option (enum_opt1) = -789;
+ ANENUM_UNSPECIFIED = 0;
+ ANENUM_VAL1 = 1;
+ ANENUM_VAL2 = 2 [(enum_value_opt1) = 123];
+ }
+}
+
+
+// A test RPC service with custom options at all possible locations (and also
+// some regular options, to make sure they interact nicely).
+message CustomOptionFooRequest {
+}
+
+message CustomOptionFooResponse {
+}
+
+message CustomOptionFooClientMessage {
+}
+
+message CustomOptionFooServerMessage {
+}
+
+service TestServiceWithCustomOptions {
+ option (service_opt1) = -9876543210;
+
+ rpc Foo(CustomOptionFooRequest) returns (CustomOptionFooResponse) {
+ option (method_opt1) = METHODOPT1_VAL2;
+ }
+}
+
+
+
+// Options of every possible field type, so we can test them all exhaustively.
+
+message DummyMessageContainingEnum {
+ enum TestEnumType {
+ TEST_OPTION_ENUM_UNSPECIFIED = 0;
+ TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE1 = 22;
+ TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE2 = -23;
+ }
+}
+
+message DummyMessageInvalidAsOptionType {
+}
+
+extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
+ bool bool_opt = 7706090;
+ int32 int32_opt = 7705709;
+ int64 int64_opt = 7705542;
+ uint32 uint32_opt = 7704880;
+ uint64 uint64_opt = 7702367;
+ sint32 sint32_opt = 7701568;
+ sint64 sint64_opt = 7700863;
+ fixed32 fixed32_opt = 7700307;
+ fixed64 fixed64_opt = 7700194;
+ sfixed32 sfixed32_opt = 7698645;
+ sfixed64 sfixed64_opt = 7685475;
+ float float_opt = 7675390;
+ double double_opt = 7673293;
+ string string_opt = 7673285;
+ bytes bytes_opt = 7673238;
+ DummyMessageContainingEnum.TestEnumType enum_opt = 7673233;
+ DummyMessageInvalidAsOptionType message_type_opt = 7665967;
+}
+
+message CustomOptionMinIntegerValues {
+ option (bool_opt) = false;
+ option (int32_opt) = -0x80000000;
+ option (int64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000;
+ option (uint32_opt) = 0;
+ option (uint64_opt) = 0;
+ option (sint32_opt) = -0x80000000;
+ option (sint64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000;
+ option (fixed32_opt) = 0;
+ option (fixed64_opt) = 0;
+ option (sfixed32_opt) = -0x80000000;
+ option (sfixed64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000;
+}
+
+message CustomOptionMaxIntegerValues {
+ option (bool_opt) = true;
+ option (int32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF;
+ option (int64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
+ option (uint32_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFF;
+ option (uint64_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
+ option (sint32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF;
+ option (sint64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
+ option (fixed32_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFF;
+ option (fixed64_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
+ option (sfixed32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF;
+ option (sfixed64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
+}
+
+message CustomOptionOtherValues {
+ option (int32_opt) = -100; // To test sign-extension.
+ option (float_opt) = 12.3456789;
+ option (double_opt) = 1.234567890123456789;
+ option (string_opt) = "Hello, \"World\"";
+ option (bytes_opt) = "Hello\0World";
+ option (enum_opt) = TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE2;
+}
+
+message SettingRealsFromPositiveInts {
+ option (float_opt) = 12;
+ option (double_opt) = 154;
+}
+
+message SettingRealsFromNegativeInts {
+ option (float_opt) = -12;
+ option (double_opt) = -154;
+}
+
+// Options of complex message types, themselves combined and extended in
+// various ways.
+
+message ComplexOptionType1 {
+ int32 foo = 1;
+ int32 foo2 = 2;
+ int32 foo3 = 3;
+ repeated int32 foo4 = 4;
+}
+
+message ComplexOptionType2 {
+ ComplexOptionType1 bar = 1;
+ int32 baz = 2;
+
+ message ComplexOptionType4 {
+ int32 waldo = 1;
+
+ extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
+ ComplexOptionType4 complex_opt4 = 7633546;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ComplexOptionType4 fred = 3;
+ repeated ComplexOptionType4 barney = 4;
+}
+
+message ComplexOptionType3 {
+ int32 qux = 1;
+}
+
+extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
+ protobuf_unittest.ComplexOptionType1 complex_opt1 = 7646756;
+ ComplexOptionType2 complex_opt2 = 7636949;
+ ComplexOptionType3 complex_opt3 = 7636463;
+}
+
+// Note that we try various different ways of naming the same extension.
+message VariousComplexOptions {
+ option (.protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo = 42;
+ option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo4 = 99;
+ option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo4 = 88;
+ option (complex_opt2).baz = 987;
+ option (complex_opt2).bar.foo = 743;
+ option (ComplexOptionType2.ComplexOptionType4.complex_opt4).waldo = 1971;
+ option (complex_opt2).fred.waldo = 321;
+ option (complex_opt2).barney = { waldo: 101 };
+ option (complex_opt2).barney = { waldo: 212 };
+ option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt3).qux = 9;
+}
+
+// ------------------------------------------------------
+// Definitions for testing aggregate option parsing.
+// See descriptor_unittest.cc.
+
+// A helper type used to test aggregate option parsing
+message Aggregate {
+ int32 i = 1;
+ string s = 2;
+
+ // A nested object
+ Aggregate sub = 3;
+}
+
+// Allow Aggregate to be used as an option at all possible locations
+// in the .proto grammer.
+extend google.protobuf.FileOptions { Aggregate fileopt = 15478479; }
+extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions { Aggregate msgopt = 15480088; }
+extend google.protobuf.FieldOptions { Aggregate fieldopt = 15481374; }
+extend google.protobuf.EnumOptions { Aggregate enumopt = 15483218; }
+extend google.protobuf.EnumValueOptions { Aggregate enumvalopt = 15486921; }
+extend google.protobuf.ServiceOptions { Aggregate serviceopt = 15497145; }
+extend google.protobuf.MethodOptions { Aggregate methodopt = 15512713; }
+
+// Try using AggregateOption at different points in the proto grammar
+option (fileopt) = {
+ s: 'FileAnnotation'
+ // Also test the handling of comments
+ /* of both types */ i: 100
+
+ sub { s: 'NestedFileAnnotation' }
+};
+
+message AggregateMessage {
+ option (msgopt) = { i:101 s:'MessageAnnotation' };
+ int32 fieldname = 1 [(fieldopt) = { s:'FieldAnnotation' }];
+}
+
+service AggregateService {
+ option (serviceopt) = { s:'ServiceAnnotation' };
+ rpc Method (AggregateMessage) returns (AggregateMessage) {
+ option (methodopt) = { s:'MethodAnnotation' };
+ }
+}
+
+enum AggregateEnum {
+ option (enumopt) = { s:'EnumAnnotation' };
+ UNSPECIFIED = 0;
+ VALUE = 1 [(enumvalopt) = { s:'EnumValueAnnotation' }];
+}
+
+// Test custom options for nested type.
+message NestedOptionType {
+ message NestedMessage {
+ option (message_opt1) = 1001;
+ int32 nested_field = 1 [(field_opt1) = 1002];
+ }
+ enum NestedEnum {
+ UNSPECIFIED = 0;
+ option (enum_opt1) = 1003;
+ NESTED_ENUM_VALUE = 1 [(enum_value_opt1) = 1004];
+ }
+}
diff --git a/third_party/protobuf/csharp/protos/unittest_issues.proto b/third_party/protobuf/csharp/protos/unittest_issues.proto
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..6c9f76344a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/protobuf/csharp/protos/unittest_issues.proto
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+syntax = "proto3";
+
+// These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect.
+// They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix.
+
+// Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified
+option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
+
+package unittest_issues;
+option optimize_for = SPEED;
+
+// Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references
+// should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C.
+message Issue307 {
+ message NestedOnce {
+ message NestedTwice {
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13
+// New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309
+
+// message A {
+// optional int32 _A = 1;
+// }
+
+// message B {
+// optional int32 B_ = 1;
+// }
+
+//message AB {
+// optional int32 a_b = 1;
+//}
+
+// Similar issue with numeric names
+// Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction.
+// See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308
+// message NumberField {
+// optional int32 _01 = 1;
+// }
+
+// issue 19 - negative enum values
+
+enum NegativeEnum {
+ NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0;
+ FiveBelow = -5;
+ MinusOne = -1;
+}
+
+message NegativeEnumMessage {
+ NegativeEnum value = 1;
+ repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false];
+ repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true];
+}
+
+// Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21
+// Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete]
+
+message DeprecatedChild {
+}
+
+enum DeprecatedEnum {
+ DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0;
+ one = 1;
+}
+
+message DeprecatedFieldsMessage {
+ int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true];
+ repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true];
+
+ DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true];
+ repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true];
+
+ DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true];
+ repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true];
+}
+
+// Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45
+message ItemField {
+ int32 item = 1;
+}
+
+message ReservedNames {
+ // Force a nested type called Types
+ message SomeNestedType {
+ }
+
+ int32 types = 1;
+ int32 descriptor = 2;
+}
+
+message TestJsonFieldOrdering {
+ // These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric
+ // order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either.
+ // This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output
+ // ordering.
+ // TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar,
+ // but doesn't include oneofs.
+ // TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although
+ // that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms.
+ // Alternatively, consider just adding this to
+ // unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it.
+
+ int32 plain_int32 = 4;
+
+ oneof o1 {
+ string o1_string = 2;
+ int32 o1_int32 = 5;
+ }
+
+ string plain_string = 1;
+
+ oneof o2 {
+ int32 o2_int32 = 6;
+ string o2_string = 3;
+ }
+
+}
+
+message TestJsonName {
+ // Message for testing the effects for of the json_name option
+ string name = 1;
+ string description = 2 [json_name = "desc"];
+ string guid = 3 [json_name = "exid"];
+}