FAQ --- ### Uzbl crashes immediately (segfaults). WTF ? You are using a libwebkit version (usually 1.1.15.*) that uses enchant which is compiled with zemberek support built-in. Compile enchant with --disable-zemberek or ask your package maintainer. See also: * https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30860 * http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12413 * http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12529 * http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17401 * http://www.uzbl.org/news.php?id=17 ### I just installed uzbl but it doesn't do much. What now? "Uzbl" is the name for the umbrella project that has several subprojects. You probably want `uzbl-browser` or `uzbl-tabbed`. The main program (`uzbl-core`) is a program meant for integration with other tools and scripts, by itself doesn't do many useful things. See README. ### Where are the widgets (forward, back,.. button etc) The layout of uzbl (and derivatives) only contains what you really need to see. We only have a statusbar, which even can also be disabled. There are no buttons, but we do have lots of keybinding possibilities. ### Why can each uzbl-core/uzbl-browser process only show one page? This allows a simple implementation of both uzbl-core and uzbl-browser, and it makes things more robust. But read the next entry... ### How can I have multiple pages in one window? So, given that uzbl-core and uzbl-browser only deal with one page at a time (see above), how can you have a window with multiple pages? Basically this involves concerns on two sides: * window management - can I keep all pages together in 1 X window so that I can move all of them to a different workspace at once - can I "split off" pages into separate windows (i.e. move only one specific page/window to a different desktop) or merge windows together? - can I integrate uzbl pages/windows into WM features? (alt-tab, tiling layouts, taskbar, ...) - ... * application-level - realtime overview of all page titles of all uzbl instances - representation styles which are tightly coupled to the application such as treeviews that show from which you page you opened others, or page state (loading etc) - ... Uzbl itself can hardly be a limiting factor, as it supports/has: * Xembed (GtkPlug mode) so you can embed a uzbl-browser or uzbl-core into another window * an events system you can have realtime updates of window title, pageload state, etc. * command interface to programmatically change it's behavior. And then there is the style of representation (tabs, tree overviews, visual thumbnails etc) which can be handled from the WM side or the application side. There are multiple approaches, each with pros and cons. * Tabbing in the WM: Xmonads tabbed layout, Wmii's stacked layout, fluxbox or kwin tabs and so on. * Visual overview in the WM: commonly used with dwm or Awesome's tiling layouts with master/slave areas. The [dynamic zoom script][] is useful here. * A container application which embeds multiple uzbl-browsers and provide tablists, tree views, and more. Examples: - [uzbl-tabbed][] (officially supported) - [uzbltreetab][] - [uzbltab][] - [suckless tabbed][] * An application to mimic tabbing independently of WM support. The only thing you need to do is focus/maximize the instance you want, keep the others out of sight and use tools like dmenu/xbindkeys and wmctrl to switch instances. This allows you to use application-specific properties (such as uzbl tag, name etc). For more ideas on such an approach, see docs/multiple-instances-management. Examples: - [wmctrl-based](http://www.uzbl.org/wiki/metacity-tabs) (works on at least Metacity) - [wmii](http://www.uzbl.org/wiki/wmii) There are really a lot of options. You need to think about what you need, what you want and what you don't care about. On the wiki you'll find a lot of related scripts, some of them providing new workflows (do you really need open windows for all pages you intend to read, or is a list enough? [articlequeue](http://www.uzbl.org/wiki/article_queue.py)), some providing integration with WMs such as [awesome](http://www.uzbl.org/wiki/awesome), and more. ### Okay, what can I actually do? What commands are there? How do I get more information? Commands and other features are documented in README. Read it. Other great resources are the example config (~/.uzbl/config/config), the scripts included with uzbl, and the wiki. ### Why can't I type anything in forms? By default uzbl is modal (like `vi`). It starts in command mode, not in insert mode. If you don't like this you can easily change it. When you are in command mode, the left side of the status bar should say `[Cmd]`. In command mode you can trigger actions inside uzbl with the minimum amount of keypresses, but webpages won't see your keypresses, because they're all being interpreted by uzbl. After going into insert mode (by default this is the 'i' binding), the status bar should say `[Ins]`. Your keypresses are not interpreted but passed on, so you can enter text into forms or use keybindings that are interpreted by the page's javascript. Press Esc to go out of insert mode. ### Why do you depend on gtk? Uzbl itself doesn't use much gtk stuff (only the statusbar) so we could do without gtk. But Webkit needs a widget toolkit to create widgets (think javascript popups, html forms etc). Officially, webkit also supportss Qt and wxwigdets. There are also some unofficial patchsets floating on the interwebs for the EFL and FLTK toolkits. One could argue we don't need no popups or fancy form widgets and you could have a point, but we prefer being reasonably assured that things work as they are supposed to rather then using some obscure patchset which may be incomplete, broken and/or badly designed, or wasting time ourselves in what is not our core objective. That's why we picked the Gtk variant of Webkit. Note that we do *not* depend on any Gnome libraries such as gconf. _That_ would be something worth complaining about :) ### Do you support flash? javascript? Ajax? Recent html/css/.. standards? Java/media plugins? Yes, Webkit takes care of all of that. Not that we like all of these, but you can use them if you want. We use the NPAPI plugin architecture (just like mozilla, opera, etc) so just install the plugins normally, and things should work. ### How can I send commands to uzbl from an external script? Every uzbl-core process creates a fifo and a socket on the filesystem that you can use to communicate with it. By default these are located at `/tmp/uzbl_fifo_[name]` and `/tmp/uzbl_socket[name]`. The example scripts and keybindings have many examples of this. ### What's the difference between the socket file and the fifo? Fifos are easy to work with. You can write commands to them like any other file into them, but they are unidirectional (you can send uzbl commands, but you can't receive responses back from it). Sockets are bidirectional but more complex. In shell scripts you can use `socat` to work with sockets. Other languages have their own ways of connecting and writing to sockets. When writing scripts fifos are usually the fastest method (because you do not need to fork another process), so fifo is preferred unless you need a response. ### Uzbl uses too much memory, especially when multiple windows are open It's not as bad as its looks! Linux (and other systems) report memory usage in a confusing way. You need to be aware of the difference between RSS and VSS. See [this page](http://virtualthreads.blogspot.com/2006/02/understanding-memory-usage-on-linux.html) for a good explanation. Dynamic libraries (libwebkit, libgtk, etc) that are used by multiple processes are only stored in RAM once. ### What the hell is this 'XDG' stuff?? You'll notice our example/default scripts and configs use variables such as `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME` and `$XDG_DATA_HOME`. The are part of the [xdg basedir spec][]. The idea is that it keeps your `$HOME` clean and separates config, data and cache. If these variables are not defined on your system, it could be that you need to install an xdg package. If you don't like this, no one is stopping you from changing the scripts and configs to point to a single `$HOME/.uzbl` directory or whatever you want. ### Does the world really need another browser? We did try a lot of browsers, and we do not suffer [NIH](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Invented_Here). We believe that the approach taken by way too many browsers is wrong. We do not want browsers that try to do everything, instead we prefer a system where different applications work together. We also like having a browser that is extensible in whatever language you're most comfortable with. We also like open source. We take a lot of things from other projects and we also try to contribute to other projects. ### What? You call all of this user-friendly? Yes. If you don't agree, don't use it :) [dynamic zoom script]: http://www.uzbl.org/wiki/dynamic_zooming [uzbl-tabbed]: http://www.uzbl.org/wiki/uzbl_tabbed [uzbltreetab]: http://www.uzbl.org/wiki/uzbltreetab [uzbltab]: http://www.uzbl.org/wiki/uzbltab [suckless tabbed]: http://tools.suckless.org/tabbed [xdg basedir spec]: http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html