From 38f118a2e7f986b06d69d0af41ec2d1af53dac39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 18:04:02 -0400
Subject: update and skip accepts check in lexers

We think we're getting away with this because our
tokens never go from legal to illegal to legal again,
right?

Change-Id: Iaaef797f7c4b487ba7b1d0e018846bd13086b34c
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/138275
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
---
 src/sksl/SkSLLexer.cpp | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/sksl/SkSLLexer.cpp')

diff --git a/src/sksl/SkSLLexer.cpp b/src/sksl/SkSLLexer.cpp
index 44ebdcad1e..5bb970a627 100644
--- a/src/sksl/SkSLLexer.cpp
+++ b/src/sksl/SkSLLexer.cpp
@@ -957,7 +957,8 @@ Token Lexer::next() {
         if (!state) {
             break;
         }
-        if (accepts[state]) {
+        // We seem to be getting away without doing this check.
+        /*if (accepts[state] != -1)*/ {
             lastAccept = (Token::Kind)accepts[state];
             lastAcceptEnd = offset;
         }
@@ -966,4 +967,4 @@ Token Lexer::next() {
     return Token(lastAccept, startOffset, lastAcceptEnd - startOffset);
 }
 
-}  // namespace
+}  // namespace SkSL
-- 
cgit v1.2.3