| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's getting us killed for OOM.
BUG=skia:3240
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1104693002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TBR=mtklein
NOTREECHECKS=true
BUG=skia:2073
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1036223002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Initial experiments did show that the 256 tile size fixed the hd2000 win7
nanobot failures. However it did not have any effect on other bots, so this
change is to move back to the larger tile size on all bots expect for the
hd2000.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1022083002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'GPU' is in 'Test-Ubuntu14-GCE-NoGPU-x86_64-Release-Valgrind_CPU' too.
This means we're building it in no-GPU mode, and running it in no-CPU mode.
At least it finishes quite quickly this way (~10 seconds).
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/992203004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BUG=skia:3506
NOPRESUBMIT=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/986583004
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TBR=mtklein@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/964053002
|
|
This should look suspiciously similar to tools/dm_flags.py. In fact, I
tweaked tools/dm_flags.py a bit to make it even more suspiciously similar.
I'll leave actually deduping this to future me.
I noticed we have an opportunity to make our Valgrind run of nanobench faster,
by not only making it not auto-calibrate (--loops 1) but also take only one
measurement (--samples 1). Should be 5-10x faster than the default.
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/957503002
|